Literature DB >> 19905295

Nonlinear q-voter model.

Claudio Castellano1, Miguel A Muñoz, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras.   

Abstract

We introduce a nonlinear variant of the voter model, the q-voter model, in which q neighbors (with possible repetition) are consulted for a voter to change opinion. If the q neighbors agree, the voter takes their opinion; if they do not have a unanimous opinion, still a voter can flip its state with probability epsilon . We solve the model on a fully connected network (i.e., in mean field) and compute the exit probability as well as the average time to reach consensus by employing the backward Fokker-Planck formalism and scaling arguments. We analyze the results in the perspective of a recently proposed Langevin equation aimed at describing generic phase transitions in systems with two ( Z2-symmetric) absorbing states. In particular, by deriving explicitly the coefficients of such a Langevin equation as a function of the microscopic flipping probabilities, we find that in mean field the q-voter model exhibits a disordered phase for high epsilon and an ordered one for low epsilon with three possible ways to go from one to the other: (i) a unique (generalized-voter-like) transition, (ii) a series of two consecutive transitions, one (Ising-like) in which the Z2 symmetry is broken and a separate one (in the directed-percolation class) in which the system falls into an absorbing state, and (iii) a series of two transitions, including an intermediate regime in which the final state depends on initial conditions. This third (so far unexplored) scenario, in which a type of ordering dynamics emerges, is rationalized and found to be specific of mean field, i.e., fluctuations are explicitly shown to wash it out in spatially extended systems.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19905295     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.041129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  14 in total

1.  Tactical voting in plurality elections.

Authors:  Nuno A M Araújo; José S Andrade; Hans J Herrmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Is the person-situation debate important for agent-based modeling and vice-versa?

Authors:  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron; Janusz Szwabiński; Rafał Weron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Hunt Opinion Model-An Agent Based Approach to Recurring Fashion Cycles.

Authors:  Rafał Apriasz; Tyll Krueger; Grzegorz Marcjasz; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A networked voting rule for democratic representation.

Authors:  Alexis R Hernández; Carlos Gracia-Lázaro; Edgardo Brigatti; Yamir Moreno
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Think then act or act then think?

Authors:  Arkadiusz Jędrzejewski; Grzegorz Marcjasz; Paul R Nail; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Conformity in numbers-Does criticality in social responses exist?

Authors:  Piotr Nyczka; Katarzyna Byrka; Paul R Nail; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is Independence Necessary for a Discontinuous Phase Transition within the q-Voter Model?

Authors:  Angelika Abramiuk; Jakub Pawłowski; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.524

8.  Discontinuous phase transitions in the multi-state noisy q-voter model: quenched vs. annealed disorder.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Nowak; Bartosz Stoń; Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Fragmentation transitions in a coevolving nonlinear voter model.

Authors:  Byungjoon Min; Maxi San Miguel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Role of Time Scales in the Coupled Epidemic-Opinion Dynamics on Multiplex Networks.

Authors:  Robert Jankowski; Anna Chmiel
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.