| Literature DB >> 33731264 |
Ananda Vardhan Hebbani1, Damodara Reddy Vaddi2, Padma Priya Dd3, Varadacharyulu NCh4.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: <class="Gene">span class="Chemical">Alcohol is a widely abused drug with many health implications, mainly caused by the oxidative and nitrosative stress on different body parts. Ayurvedic herbalism authenticates the multiple therapeutic applications of Terminalia arjuna bark due to its rich phytochemical repertoire.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol; Erythrocyte membrane; Herbal remedy; Oxidative stress; Terminalia arjuna
Year: 2021 PMID: 33731264 PMCID: PMC8186002 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2021.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Fig. 1Effect of AETA administration on erythrocyte membrane lipid peroxidation (LPO) and Protein carbonyl contents in control and experimental group of rats. Values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 8). A p < 0.05 is considered as significantly different between groups. “∗” symbol represents “significant difference” compared to control and “ns” symbol represents “not-significantly different” from control group of rats.
Effect of administration of AETA on erythrocyte membrane total cholesterol and total phospholipids in chronic alcoholic rats.
| Parameter | Control | Alcohol | Alcohol + AETA | AETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Cholesterol (μg/mg protein) | 89.8 ± 2.9d | 168.0 ± 5.9a | 98.7 ± 3.3c | 83.4 ± 6.6d |
| Total Phospholipids (μg/mg protein) | 103.1 ± 3.7d | 135.0 ± 6.8a | 105.4 ± 4.2c | 99.7 ± 4.2d |
| C/P ratio | 0.87 | 1.24 | 0.93 | 0.83 |
Values are Mean ± SEM of eight rats in each group. Means in a row not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05) among groups.
Fig. 2Effect of AETA administration on erythrocyte membrane individual phospholipids; phosphatidyl choline (PC), phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl serine (PS), phosphatidyl inositol (PI) and sphingomyelin (SM) in control and experimental group of rats. Values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 8). A p < 0.05 is considered as significantly different between groups. “∗” symbol represents “significant difference” compared to control and “ns” symbol represents “not-significantly different” from control group of rats.
Effect of administration of AETA on erythrocyte membrane antioxidant enzymes in chronic alcoholic rats.
| Parameter | Control | Alcohol | Alcohol + AETA | AETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSH (μmol/gHb) | 3.69 ± 0.1a | 2.91 ± 0.2c | 3.67 ± 0.1a | 3.86 ± 0.8a |
| GPx (μmol of GSH oxidised/min/mgHb | 17.0 ± 1.8a | 12.6 ± 1.1c | 17.4 ± 1.4a | 17.3 ± 1.8a |
| SOD (Units/mgHb/min) | 6.14 ± 0.2a | 4.52 ± 0.4c | 5.91 ± 0.7a | 6.27 ± 0.6a |
| Catalase (IUX104/gHb) | 8.44 ± 0.6a | 6.03 ± 0.9c | 8.29 ± 0.9a | 8.61 ± 0.1a |
Values are Mean ± SEM of eight rats in each group. Means in a row not sharing a common superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05) among groups.
Fig. 3Effect of AETA administration on erythrocyte membrane anisotropic value (γ) in control and experimental group of rats. Values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 8). A p < 0.05 is considered as significantly different between groups. “∗” symbol represents “significant difference” compared to control and “ns” symbol represents “not-significantly different” from control group of rats.
Fig. 4Osmotic stability curves of erythrocytes from rats of different treatment groups, showing the variation of hemolysis percentage at different NaCl concentrations. Alcohol treatment to healthy rats enhanced susceptibility of their erythrocytes to hemolysis, as evident from the right shift of the ethanol curve from the normal curve (4a). Rats treated with AETA alone, showed enhanced resistance to hypotonic shock, depicted by a slight left-shift of AETA curve in comparison with the control curve (4b). Pre-treatment of alcohol-fed rats with AETA, effectively reversed the alcohol induced erythrocyte hemolysis, as evident from the large left-shift of AETA curve, compared to the alcohol curve (4c).
Fig. 5Photomicrographs of erythrocytes of control and experimental group of rats, wherein blood smear from control group of rats (5a) showed normal erythrocytes (NE) with the normal biconcave, discoid shape and smooth surface morphology. While smear sample from ethanol-treated rat (5b) showed very few numbers of normal erythrocytes (NE) and a large number of deformed erythrocytes (DE) with a maximum number of them getting transformed into echinocytes (EC), spherocytes (SP) and stomatocytes (ST), the smear sample from alcoholic rats treated with AETA (5c) showed normal morphological features with reduces the number of EC and increased number of NE. Erythrocytes of rats treated with AETA alone (5d) showed normal erythrocyte morphological features like that of control group.
Enumeration of different erythrocyte forms in control and experimental rats.
| Erythrocyte shapes | Control | Alcohol | Alcohol + AETA | AETA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total erythrocyte number | 179 | 168 | 173 | 128 |
| Normal erythrocytes | 90% ( | 24% ( | 80% ( | 95% ( |
| Stomatocytes | 0% | 9% ( | 0% | 0% |
| Echinocytes | 7.4% ( | 49% ( | 21% ( | 4.9% ( |
| Spherocytes | 2.5% ( | 19% ( | 0% | 1.9% ( |
| Deformed erythrocytes | 8.6% ( | 76% ( | 21% ( | 5.8% ( |
| Normal: Abnormal ratio |
Values are in number of erythrocytes.
Values are the percentages (number of cells in brackets) of different erythrocyte shapes counted under the microscope.
Fig. 6Correlation analysis (r values) between the fluorescent anisotropic values () and C/P ratios of the alcoholic group of rats (n = 8); determined by Pearson correlation analysis method.