Literature DB >> 33730081

A comparative analysis of biogas production from tomato bio-waste in mesophilic batch and continuous anaerobic digestion systems.

Árpád Szilágyi1, Attila Bodor1,2,3, Norbert Tolvai1, Kornél L Kovács1,3,4, László Bodai5, Roland Wirth1, Zoltán Bagi1, Ágnes Szepesi6, Viktória Markó1, Balázs Kakuk1, Naila Bounedjoum1, Gábor Rákhely1,2,3.   

Abstract

Annually, agricultural activity produces an enormous amount of plant biomass by-product. Many studies have reported the biomethane potential of agro-industrial wastes, but only a few studies have investigated applying the substrates in both batch and continuous mode. Tomato is one of the most popular vegetables globally; its processing releases a substantial amount of by-product, such as stems and leaves. This study examined the BMP of tomato plant (Solanum lycopersicum Mill. L. cv. Alfred) waste. A comparative test revealed that the BMPs of corn stover, tomato waste,and their combination were approximately the same, around 280 mL methane/g Volatile Solid. In contrast, the relative biogas production decreased in the presence of tomato waste in a continuous mesophilic anaerobic digestion system; the daily biogas productions were 860 ± 80, 290 ± 50, and 570 ± 70 mL biogas/gVolatile Solid/day in the case of corn stover, tomato waste, and their mixture, respectively. The methane content of biogas was around 46-48%. The fermentation parameters of the continuous AD experiments were optimal in all cases; thus, TW might have an inhibitory effect on the microbial community. Tomato plant materials contain e.g. flavonoids, glycoalkaloids (such as tomatine and tomatidine), etc. known as antimicrobial and antifungal agents. The negative effect of tomatine on the biogas yield was confirmed in batch fermentation experiments. Metagenomic analysis revealed that the tomato plant waste caused significant rearrangements in the microbial communities in the continuously operated reactors. The results demonstrated that tomato waste could be a good mono-substrate in batch fermentations or a co-substrate with corn stover in a proper ratio in continuous anaerobic fermentations for biogas production. These results also point to the importance of running long-term continuous fermentations to test the suitability of a novel biomass substrate for industrial biogas production.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33730081      PMCID: PMC7968646          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  37 in total

1.  In-depth diversity analysis of the bacterial community resident in the camel rumen.

Authors:  Javad Gharechahi; Hossein Shahbani Zahiri; Kambiz Akbari Noghabi; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Anaerobic digestion performance and microbial community structure of corn stover in three-stage continuously stirred tank reactors.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Akiber Chufo Wachemo; HaiRong Yuan; XiuJin Li
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Adaptation of continuous biogas reactors operating under wet fermentation conditions to dry conditions with corn stover as substrate.

Authors:  Balázs Kakuk; Kornél L Kovács; Márk Szuhaj; Gábor Rákhely; Zoltán Bagi
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.331

4.  Methanothrix enhances biogas upgrading in microbial electrolysis cell via direct electron transfer.

Authors:  Chuanqi Liu; Dezhi Sun; Zhiqiang Zhao; Yan Dang; Dawn E Holmes
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 9.642

5.  Effect of high temperature on bacterial community dynamics in anaerobic acidogenesis using mesophilic sludge inoculum.

Authors:  Woong Kim; Kwanghyun Hwang; Seung Gu Shin; Seungyong Lee; Seokhwan Hwang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 9.642

6.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 7.  The Thaumarchaeota: an emerging view of their phylogeny and ecophysiology.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Christa Schleper; Michael Wagner
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 7.934

8.  An accurate and efficient experimental approach for characterization of the complex oral microbiota.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Maria Tsompana; Angela Ruscitto; Ashu Sharma; Robert Genco; Yijun Sun; Michael J Buck
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Methane-yielding microbial communities processing lactate-rich substrates: a piece of the anaerobic digestion puzzle.

Authors:  Anna Detman; Damian Mielecki; Łukasz Pleśniak; Michał Bucha; Marek Janiga; Irena Matyasik; Aleksandra Chojnacka; Mariusz-Orion Jędrysek; Mieczysław K Błaszczyk; Anna Sikora
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Pseudomonas spp. are key players in agricultural biogas substrate degradation.

Authors:  Christian Buettner; Martin von Bergen; Nico Jehmlich; Matthias Noll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Microbial Pretreatment of Chicken Feather and Its Co-digestion With Rice Husk and Green Grocery Waste for Enhanced Biogas Production.

Authors:  Marium Saba; Anum Khan; Huma Ali; Amna Bibi; Zeeshan Gul; Alam Khan; Muhammad Maqsood Ur Rehman; Malik Badshah; Fariha Hasan; Aamer Ali Shah; Samiullah Khan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.