Literature DB >> 25467553

In-depth diversity analysis of the bacterial community resident in the camel rumen.

Javad Gharechahi1, Hossein Shahbani Zahiri2, Kambiz Akbari Noghabi3, Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh4.   

Abstract

The rumen compartment of the ruminant digestive tract is an enlarged fermentation chamber which houses a diverse collection of symbiotic microorganisms that provide the host animal with a remarkable ability to digest plant lignocellulosic materials. Characterization of the ruminal microbial community provides opportunities to improve animal food digestion efficiency, mitigate methane emission, and develop efficient fermentation systems to convert plant biomasses into biofuels. In this study, 16S rRNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing was applied in order to explore the structure of the bacterial community inhabiting the camel rumen. Using 76,333 quality-checked, chimera- and singleton-filtered reads, 4954 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified at a 97% species level sequence identity. At the phylum level, more than 96% of the reads were affiliated to OTUs belonging to Bacteroidetes (51%), Firmicutes (31%), Proteobacteria (4.8%), Spirochaetes (3.5%), Fibrobacteres (3.1%), Verrucomicrobia (2.7%), and Tenericutes (0.95%). A total of 15% of the OTUs (746) that contained representative sequences from all major taxa were shared by all animals and they were considered as candidate members of the core camel rumen microbiome. Analysis of microbial composition through the solid and liquid fractions of rumen digesta revealed differential enrichment of members of Fibrobacter, Clostridium, Ruminococcus, and Treponema in the solid fraction, as well as members of Prevotella, Verrucomicrobia, Cyanobacteria, and Succinivibrio in the liquid fraction. The results clearly showed that the camel rumen microbiome was structurally similar but compositionally distinct from that of other ruminants, such as the cow. The unique characteristic of the camel rumen microbiome that differentiated it from those of other ruminants was the significant enrichment for cellulolytic bacteria.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  454 pyrosequencing; Camel; Microbiome; Rumen; Rumen ecology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25467553     DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0723-2020            Impact factor:   4.022


  27 in total

1.  Unraveling the camel rumen microbiome through metaculturomics approach for agriculture waste hydrolytic potential.

Authors:  Shweta Srivastava; Nishant A Dafale; Subhash J Jakhesara; Chaitanya G Joshi; Niteen V Patil; Hemant J Purohit
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Responses in the rumen microbiome of Bos taurus and indicus steers fed a low-quality rice straw diet and supplemented protein.

Authors:  E A Latham; K K Weldon; T A Wickersham; J A Coverdale; W E Pinchak
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Metagenomic analysis reveals a dynamic microbiome with diversified adaptive functions to utilize high lignocellulosic forages in the cattle rumen.

Authors:  Javad Gharechahi; Mohammad Farhad Vahidi; Mohammad Bahram; Jian-Lin Han; Xue-Zhi Ding; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Enhancing the Resolution of Rumen Microbial Classification from Metatranscriptomic Data Using Kraken and Mothur.

Authors:  Andre L A Neves; Fuyong Li; Bibaswan Ghoshal; Tim McAllister; Le L Guan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Maintaining stability of the rumen ecosystem is associated with changes of microbial composition and epithelial TLR signaling.

Authors:  Hong Shen; Zhan Chen; Zanming Shen; Zhongyan Lu
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Effects of various weaning times on growth performance, rumen fermentation and microbial population of yellow cattle calves.

Authors:  Huiling Mao; Yuefeng Xia; Yan Tu; Chong Wang; Qiyu Diao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  The dynamics of the bacterial communities developed in maize silage.

Authors:  Javad Gharechahi; Zohreh Akhavan Kharazian; Sajjad Sarikhan; Gholamreza Salehi Jouzani; Mahnaz Aghdasi; Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Comparison of Fecal Microbiota of Mongolian and Thoroughbred Horses by High-throughput Sequencing of the V4 Region of the 16S rRNA Gene.

Authors:  Yiping Zhao; Bei Li; Dongyi Bai; Jinlong Huang; Wunierfu Shiraigo; Lihua Yang; Qinan Zhao; Xiujuan Ren; Jing Wu; Wuyundalai Bao; Manglai Dugarjaviin
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Two new gene clusters involved in the degradation of plant cell wall from the fecal microbiota of Tunisian dromedary.

Authors:  Rihab Ameri; Elisabeth Laville; Gabrielle Potocki-Véronèse; Sahar Trabelsi; Monia Mezghani; Fatma Elgharbi; Samir Bejar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  New roles in hemicellulosic sugar fermentation for the uncultivated Bacteroidetes family BS11.

Authors:  Lindsey M Solden; David W Hoyt; William B Collins; Johanna E Plank; Rebecca A Daly; Erik Hildebrand; Timothy J Beavers; Richard Wolfe; Carrie D Nicora; Sam O Purvine; Michelle Carstensen; Mary S Lipton; Donald E Spalinger; Jeffrey L Firkins; Barbara A Wolfe; Kelly C Wrighton
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.