Literature DB >> 33729503

Point-of-Care Digital Cytology With Artificial Intelligence for Cervical Cancer Screening in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Oscar Holmström1, Nina Linder1,2, Harrison Kaingu3, Ngali Mbuuko3, Jumaa Mbete3, Felix Kinyua3, Sara Törnquist4, Martin Muinde3, Leena Krogerus5, Mikael Lundin1, Vinod Diwan4, Johan Lundin1,4.   

Abstract

Importance: Cervical cancer is highly preventable but remains a common and deadly cancer in areas without screening programs. The creation of a diagnostic system to digitize Papanicolaou test samples and analyze them using a cloud-based deep learning system (DLS) may provide needed cervical cancer screening to resource-limited areas. Objective: To determine whether artificial intelligence-supported digital microscopy diagnostics can be implemented in a resource-limited setting and used for analysis of Papanicolaou tests. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic study, cervical smears from 740 HIV-positive women aged between 18 and 64 years were collected between September 1, 2018, and September 30, 2019. The smears were digitized with a portable slide scanner, uploaded to a cloud server using mobile networks, and used to train and validate a DLS for the detection of atypical cervical cells. This single-center study was conducted at a local health care center in rural Kenya. Exposures: Detection of squamous cell atypia in the digital samples by analysis with the DLS. Main Outcomes and Measures: The accuracy of the DLS in the detection of low- and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in Papanicolaou test whole-slide images.
Results: Papanicolaou test results from 740 HIV-positive women (mean [SD] age, 41.8 [10.3] years) were collected. The DLS was trained using 350 whole-slide images and validated on 361 whole-slide images (average size, 100 387 × 47 560 pixels). For detection of cervical cellular atypia, sensitivities were 95.7% (95% CI, 85.5%-99.5%) and 100% (95% CI, 82.4%-100%), and specificities were 84.7% (95% CI, 80.2%-88.5%) and 78.4% (95% CI, 73.6%-82.4%), compared with the pathologist assessment of digital and physical slides, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.94 and 0.96, respectively. Negative predictive values were high (99%-100%), and accuracy was high, particularly for the detection of high-grade lesions. Interrater agreement was substantial compared with the pathologist assessment of digital slides (κ = 0.72) and fair compared with the assessment of glass slides (κ = 0.36). No samples that were classified as high grade by manual sample analysis had false-negative assessments by the DLS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, digital microscopy with artificial intelligence was implemented at a rural clinic and used to detect atypical cervical smears with a high sensitivity compared with visual sample analysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33729503      PMCID: PMC7970338          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  41 in total

1.  Procedures used in the creation of the American Society of Cytopathology cervical Cytology Practice Guideline.

Authors:  M U Prey
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Trichomonas vaginalis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection Among Women Under Community Supervision: A Call for Expanded T. vaginalis Screening.

Authors:  Alissa Davis; Anindita Dasgupta; Dawn Goddard-Eckrich; Nabila El-Bassel
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 3.  Statistical methodology: I. Incorporating the prevalence of disease into the sample size calculation for sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  N M Buderer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 4.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  DeepPap: Deep Convolutional Networks for Cervical Cell Classification.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Isabella Nogues; Ronald M Summers; Shaoxiong Liu; Jianhua Yao
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 5.772

Review 6.  The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer.

Authors:  F X Bosch; A Lorincz; N Muñoz; C J L M Meijer; K V Shah
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Access to pathology and laboratory medicine services: a crucial gap.

Authors:  Michael L Wilson; Kenneth A Fleming; Modupe A Kuti; Lai Meng Looi; Nestor Lago; Kun Ru
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Automated classification of Pap smear images to detect cervical dysplasia.

Authors:  Kangkana Bora; Manish Chowdhury; Lipi B Mahanta; Malay Kumar Kundu; Anup Kumar Das
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  HPV Type Distribution and Cervical Cytology among HIV-Positive Tanzanian and South African Women.

Authors:  Joke A M Dols; Gregor Reid; Joelle M Brown; Hugo Tempelman; Tj Romke Bontekoe; Wim G V Quint; Mathilde E Boon
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-28

10.  Quantification of Estrogen Receptor-Alpha Expression in Human Breast Carcinomas With a Miniaturized, Low-Cost Digital Microscope: A Comparison with a High-End Whole Slide-Scanner.

Authors:  Oscar Holmström; Nina Linder; Mikael Lundin; Hannu Moilanen; Antti Suutala; Riku Turkki; Heikki Joensuu; Jorma Isola; Vinod Diwan; Johan Lundin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Colposcopy: A Retrospective Data Analysis.

Authors:  Yuqian Zhao; Yucong Li; Lu Xing; Haike Lei; Duke Chen; Chao Tang; Xiaosheng Li
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.375

2.  Deep learning in image-based breast and cervical cancer detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Xue; Jiaxu Wang; Dongxu Qin; Huijiao Yan; Yimin Qu; Samuel Seery; Yu Jiang; Youlin Qiao
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 3.  Importance of Cytopathologic Diagnosis in Early Cancer Diagnosis in Resource-Constrained Countries.

Authors:  Kavita Yadav; Ian Cree; Andrew Field; Philippe Vielh; Ravi Mehrotra
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-02

4.  A Deep Learning Model for Cervical Cancer Screening on Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens in Whole Slide Images.

Authors:  Fahdi Kanavati; Naoki Hirose; Takahiro Ishii; Ayaka Fukuda; Shin Ichihara; Masayuki Tsuneki
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Xin Hou; Guangyang Shen; Liqiang Zhou; Yinuo Li; Tian Wang; Xiangyi Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Artificial intelligence-based prediction for cancer-related outcomes in Africa: Status and potential refinements.

Authors:  John Adeoye; Abdulwarith Akinshipo; Peter Thomson; Yu-Xiong Su
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 7.664

7.  Identification of women with high grade histopathology results after conisation by artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Marko Mlinaric; Miljenko Krizmaric; Iztok Takac; Alenka Repse Fokter
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 8.  The Application of Wearable Glucose Sensors in Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Sheng Zhang; Junyan Zeng; Chunge Wang; Luying Feng; Zening Song; Wenjie Zhao; Qianqian Wang; Chen Liu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.