Literature DB >> 33729393

Footwear designed to enhance energy return improves running economy compared to a minimalist footwear: does it matter for running performance?

R C Dinato1, R Cruz1,2, R A Azevedo1,3, J S Hasegawa1, R G Silva1, A P Ribeiro4, A E Lima-Silva5, R Bertuzzi1.   

Abstract

The present study compared the effects of a footwear designed to enhance energy return (thermoplastic polyurethane, TPU) vs minimalist shoes on running economy (RE) and endurance performance. In this counterbalanced and crossover design study, 11 recreational male runners performed two submaximal constant-speed running tests and two 3-km time-trials with the two shoe models. Oxygen uptake was measured during submaximal constant-speed running tests in order to determine the RE at 12 km/h and oxygen cost of running (CTO2) at individual average speed sustained during the 3-km running time-trials wearing either of the two shoes. Our results revealed that RE was improved (2.4%) with TPU shoes compared with minimalist shoes (P=0.01). However, there was no significant difference for CTO2 (P=0.61) and running performance (P=0.52) comparing the TPU (710±60 s) and the minimalist (718±63 s) shoe models. These novel findings demonstrate that shoes with enhanced mechanical energy return (i.e. TPU) produced a lower energy cost of running at low (i.e., 12 km/h) but not at high speeds (i.e., average speed sustained during the 3-km running time-trial, ∼15 km/h), ultimately resulting in similar running performance compared to the minimalist shoe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33729393      PMCID: PMC7959157          DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X202010693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res        ISSN: 0100-879X            Impact factor:   2.590


  29 in total

1.  SKINFOLD DISTRIBUTIONS IN MIDDLE-AGED AMERICAN MEN: A CONTRIBUTION TO NORMS OF LEANNESS-FATNESS.

Authors:  J BROZEK; J K KIHLBERG; H L TAYLOR; A KEYS
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1963-09-26       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  Factors affecting running economy in trained distance runners.

Authors:  Philo U Saunders; David B Pyne; Richard D Telford; John A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Energy system contribution to 1500- and 3000-metre track running.

Authors:  Rob Duffield; Brian Dawson; Carmel Goodman
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.

Authors:  R Squadrone; C Gallozzi
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Metabolic cost of running barefoot versus shod: is lighter better?

Authors:  Jason R Franz; Corbyn M Wierzbinski; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

7.  Running economy and distance running performance of highly trained athletes.

Authors:  D L Conley; G S Krahenbuhl
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Practical Assessment of Body Composition.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  Interrelationships between muscle structure, muscle strength, and running economy.

Authors:  Heikki Kyrolainen; Riikka Kivela; Satu Koskinen; Jeff McBride; Jesper L Andersen; Timo Takala; Sarianna Sipila; Paavo V Komi
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Static stretching alters neuromuscular function and pacing strategy, but not performance during a 3-km running time-trial.

Authors:  Mayara V Damasceno; Marcos Duarte; Leonardo A Pasqua; Adriano E Lima-Silva; Brian R MacIntosh; Rômulo Bertuzzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.