Rohit Jaswaney1, Arlene Davis, R Jean Cadigan, Margaret Waltz, Elizabeth R Brassfield, Bex Forcier, Benny L Joyner. 1. New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York (Dr Jaswaney); and Department of Social Medicine (Drs Davis, Cadigan, Waltz, and Joyner and Mx Forcier), School of Medicine (Dr Brassfield), and Department of Pediatrics (Dr Joyner), University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals have developed visitor restriction policies in order to mitigate spread of infection. We reviewed hospital visitor restriction policies for consistency and to develop recommendations to highlight fair and transparent restrictions, exceptions, and appeals in policy development and implementation. DESIGN: Collection and analysis of public-facing visitor restriction policies during the first 3 months of the pandemic. SETTING: General acute care hospitals representing 23 states across all 4 major regions of the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of the 70 largest hospitals by total bed capacity. MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics of visitor restriction policies including general visitor restriction statement, changes/updates to policies over time, exceptions to policies, and restrictions specific to COVID-19-positive patients. RESULTS: Sixty-five of the 70 hospitals reviewed had public-facing visitor restriction policies. Forty-nine of these 65 policies had general "no-visitor" statements, whereas 16 allowed at least 1 visitor to accompany all patients. Sixty-three of 65 hospitals included exceptions to their visitor restriction policies. Setting-specific exceptions included pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, emergency department, behavioral health, inpatient rehabilitation, surgery, and outpatient clinics. Exceptions that applied across settings included patients at end of life and patients with disabilities. CONCLUSION: Visitor restriction policies varied significantly among hospitals in this review. These variances create challenges in that their fair application may be problematic and ethical issues related to allocation may arise. Five recommendations are offered for hospitals revising or creating such policies, including that offering transparent, accessible, public-facing policies can minimize ethical dilemmas. In addition, hospitals would benefit from communicating with each other in the development of visitor policies to ensure uniformity and support patients and family members as they navigate hospital visitation.
OBJECTIVE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals have developed visitor restriction policies in order to mitigate spread of infection. We reviewed hospital visitor restriction policies for consistency and to develop recommendations to highlight fair and transparent restrictions, exceptions, and appeals in policy development and implementation. DESIGN: Collection and analysis of public-facing visitor restriction policies during the first 3 months of the pandemic. SETTING: General acute care hospitals representing 23 states across all 4 major regions of the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of the 70 largest hospitals by total bed capacity. MEASUREMENTS: Characteristics of visitor restriction policies including general visitor restriction statement, changes/updates to policies over time, exceptions to policies, and restrictions specific to COVID-19-positive patients. RESULTS: Sixty-five of the 70 hospitals reviewed had public-facing visitor restriction policies. Forty-nine of these 65 policies had general "no-visitor" statements, whereas 16 allowed at least 1 visitor to accompany all patients. Sixty-three of 65 hospitals included exceptions to their visitor restriction policies. Setting-specific exceptions included pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, emergency department, behavioral health, inpatient rehabilitation, surgery, and outpatient clinics. Exceptions that applied across settings included patients at end of life and patients with disabilities. CONCLUSION: Visitor restriction policies varied significantly among hospitals in this review. These variances create challenges in that their fair application may be problematic and ethical issues related to allocation may arise. Five recommendations are offered for hospitals revising or creating such policies, including that offering transparent, accessible, public-facing policies can minimize ethical dilemmas. In addition, hospitals would benefit from communicating with each other in the development of visitor policies to ensure uniformity and support patients and family members as they navigate hospital visitation.
Authors: Kelly C Vranas; Sara E Golden; Shannon Nugent; Thomas S Valley; Amanda Schutz; Abhijit Duggal; Kevin P Seitz; Steven Y Chang; Christopher G Slatore; Donald R Sullivan; Catherine L Hough; Kusum S Mathews Journal: Chest Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 10.262
Authors: Alexander X Lo; Logan K Wedel; Shan W Liu; Thiti Wongtangman; Phraewa Thatphet; Ilianna Santangelo; Anita N Chary; Paul D Biddinger; Corita R Grudzen; Maura Kennedy Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2022-01-20
Authors: Lesley Gotlib Conn; Natalie G Coburn; Lisa Di Prospero; Julie Hallet; Laurie Legere; Tracy MacCharles; Jessica Slutsker; Ru Tagger; Frances C Wright; Barbara Haas Journal: SSM Qual Res Health Date: 2022-08-02
Authors: Christina Collart; Caitlin Craighead; Susannah Rose; Richard Frankel; Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds; Uma Perni; Edward K Chien; Marissa Coleridge; Angela Ranzini; Ruth M Farrell Journal: Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) Date: 2022-08-04
Authors: Sophia Lewis; Stephen Y Liang; Evan S Schwarz; David B Liss; Rachel P Winograd; Nathanial S Nolan; Michael J Durkin; Laura R Marks Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 3.835