Literature DB >> 33728163

Compressive Cervical Myelopathy in Patients With Demyelinating Disease of the Central Nervous System: Improvement After Surgery Despite a Late Diagnosis.

Carl Youssef1, Umaru Barrie1, Mahmoud Elguindy1, Zachary Christian1, James P Caruso1, Zachary D Johnson1, Kristen Hall1, Salah G Aoun1, Carlos A Bagley1, Mazin Al Tamimi1.   

Abstract

Objective We aimed to assess the impact of surgical intervention on outcome in patients diagnosed with demyelinating disorders and cervical degenerative disease warranting surgical intervention. Methods The records of patients with a diagnosis of a demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system who underwent cervical spine surgery at a single institution from 2016 to 2020 were reviewed. Demyelinating disease included multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica, and transverse myelitis (TM). The dates of initial spine symptom onset, recognition of spinal pathology by the primary provider, referral to spine surgery, and spine surgery procedures were collected. Hospital length of stay (LOS) and postoperative outcomes and complications were recorded. Results A total of 19 patients with a diagnosis of demyelinating disorders underwent cervical spine surgery at our institution. Seventeen patients had MS. The average time interval between a documented diagnosis of myelopathy or radiculopathy and referral to the Spine clinic was 67.95 months (M=40, SD=64.87). Twelve patients had imaging studies depicting degenerative spine disease that would warrant surgical intervention at the time of examination by their primary physician. The average delay for referral to the Spine clinic for these patients was 16.5 months (M=5; SD=25.36). More than 89% of patients experienced significant neurologic improvement postoperatively. Conclusions There is a delay in the recognition of cervical spine disease amenable to a surgical resolution in patients with demyelinating disorders. Surgical treatment can lead to significant clinical improvement in this patient population even if delayed, and likely carries similar risk to that of the general population.
Copyright © 2021, Youssef et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cervical discectomy; cervical spine fusion; cervical spondylosis; demyelinating disorders; multiple sclerosis; transverse myelitis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33728163      PMCID: PMC7935266          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  15 in total

1.  The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  S Nurick
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Surgical outcome in patients with coexisting multiple sclerosis and spondylosis.

Authors:  W F Young; M Weaver; B Mishra
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Surgery for cervical spinal cord compression in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Bashir; C Y Cai; T A Moore; J N Whitaker; M N Hadley
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Surgical management of patients with coexistent multiple sclerosis and cervical stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ketan Yerneni; Noah Nichols; John F Burke; Vincent C Traynelis; Lee A Tan
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 1.961

5.  Surgical treatment of patients with cervical myeloradiculopathy and coexistent multiple sclerosis: report of 15 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Paul M Arnold; Robert Kyle Warren; Karen K Anderson; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2011-05

6.  The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Branko Kopjar; Aria Nouri; Paul Arnold; Giuseppe Barbagallo; Ronald Bartels; Zhou Qiang; Anoushka Singh; Mehmet Zileli; Alexander Vaccaro; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical outcomes following surgical management of coexistent cervical stenosis and multiple sclerosis: a cohort-controlled analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Lubelski; Kalil G Abdullah; Matthew D Alvin; Timothy Y Wang; Amy S Nowacki; Michael P Steinmetz; Richard M Ransohoff; Edward C Benzel; Thomas E Mroz
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Unsuspected multiple sclerosis in patients with presumed chronic spondylotic myelopathy: report on 4 cases.

Authors:  F Meyer; G Sandovss
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  1994

9.  Diagnostic Delays Lead to Greater Disability in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy and Represent a Health Inequality.

Authors:  Daniel H Pope; Oliver D Mowforth; Benjamin M Davies; Mark R N Kotter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and disease progression associated with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mark J Tullman
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mehdi Rezaee; Mohammad Hossein Morowvat; Maryam Poursadeghfard; Armin Radgoudarzi; Khosro Keshavarz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 2.  Is surgery beneficial for patients with concurrent multiple sclerosis and degenerative cervical myelopathy? A review of literature.

Authors:  William Owiti; Nikolay Peev; Shahswar Arif; Zarina Brady; Tarek AbdelHafiz
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2022-01-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.