BACKGROUND: Low health literacy is believed to be associated with behaviours that increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. But there is limited knowledge on the relation between health literacy (HL) and diabetes risk, and whether improving HL could be a potential prevention strategy. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to examine the link between HL and diabetes risk among non-diabetic adults. METHODS: We used data from the Hamburg Diabetes Prevention Survey, a population-based cross-sectional study in Germany. One thousand, two hundred and fifty-five non-diabetic subjects aged 18-60 years were eligible. The German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS, ranging 0 to 123 points) was used to determine the individual risk of type 2 diabetes. The short version of the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16, ranging 0 to 16 points) was applied to assess the individual self-reported HL. Subjects were asked to self-estimate their diabetes risk, which was then compared with the calculated GDRS. Descriptive statistics were calculated to investigate group differences in the GDRS and self-estimated diabetes risk. Linear as well as logistic regression models were performed to analyse potential influencing variables of the GDRS as well as incorrect self-estimated diabetes risk. In three nested statistical models for each outcome, these analyses were adjusted for age, gender, educational level and the presence of chronic conditions. RESULTS: According to the criteria of the GDRS, 996 (79.4%) subjects showed "low risk", 176 (14.0%) "still low risk", 53 (4.2%) "elevated risk", and 30 (2.4%) "high to very high risk" to develop type 2 diabetes within the next 5 years. In the statistical models including all control variables, subjects with "inadequate HL" scored 2.38 points higher on the GDRS (95% CI 0.378 to 4.336; P = 0.020) and had a 2.04 greater chance to estimate their diabetes risk incorrectly (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.33 to 3.14; P = 0.001) compared to those with "sufficient HL". CONCLUSION: The risk of type 2 diabetes is increased in people with inadequate self-reported HL. People with high diabetes risk and inadequate HL might be provided with educational programs to improve diabetes knowledge and reduce behavioural risk factors.
BACKGROUND: Low health literacy is believed to be associated with behaviours that increase the risk of type 2 diabetes. But there is limited knowledge on the relation between health literacy (HL) and diabetes risk, and whether improving HL could be a potential prevention strategy. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to examine the link between HL and diabetes risk among non-diabetic adults. METHODS: We used data from the Hamburg Diabetes Prevention Survey, a population-based cross-sectional study in Germany. One thousand, two hundred and fifty-five non-diabetic subjects aged 18-60 years were eligible. The German Diabetes Risk Score (GDRS, ranging 0 to 123 points) was used to determine the individual risk of type 2 diabetes. The short version of the European Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16, ranging 0 to 16 points) was applied to assess the individual self-reported HL. Subjects were asked to self-estimate their diabetes risk, which was then compared with the calculated GDRS. Descriptive statistics were calculated to investigate group differences in the GDRS and self-estimated diabetes risk. Linear as well as logistic regression models were performed to analyse potential influencing variables of the GDRS as well as incorrect self-estimated diabetes risk. In three nested statistical models for each outcome, these analyses were adjusted for age, gender, educational level and the presence of chronic conditions. RESULTS: According to the criteria of the GDRS, 996 (79.4%) subjects showed "low risk", 176 (14.0%) "still low risk", 53 (4.2%) "elevated risk", and 30 (2.4%) "high to very high risk" to develop type 2 diabetes within the next 5 years. In the statistical models including all control variables, subjects with "inadequate HL" scored 2.38 points higher on the GDRS (95% CI 0.378 to 4.336; P = 0.020) and had a 2.04 greater chance to estimate their diabetes risk incorrectly (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.33 to 3.14; P = 0.001) compared to those with "sufficient HL". CONCLUSION: The risk of type 2 diabetes is increased in people with inadequate self-reported HL. People with high diabetes risk and inadequate HL might be provided with educational programs to improve diabetes knowledge and reduce behavioural risk factors.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetes risk; GDRS; HLS-EU-Q16; Health literacy; Prevention; Type 2 diabetes
Authors: S Schipf; A Werner; T Tamayo; R Holle; M Schunk; W Maier; C Meisinger; B Thorand; K Berger; G Mueller; S Moebus; B Bokhof; A Kluttig; K H Greiser; H Neuhauser; U Ellert; A Icks; W Rathmann; H Völzke Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Matthias B Schulze; Kurt Hoffmann; Heiner Boeing; Jakob Linseisen; Sabine Rohrmann; Matthias Möhlig; Andreas F H Pfeiffer; Joachim Spranger; Claus Thamer; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Andreas Fritsche; Hans-Georg Joost Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: J Tuomilehto; J Lindström; J G Eriksson; T T Valle; H Hämäläinen; P Ilanne-Parikka; S Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; M Laakso; A Louheranta; M Rastas; V Salminen; M Uusitupa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-05-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kristine Sørensen; Jürgen M Pelikan; Florian Röthlin; Kristin Ganahl; Zofia Slonska; Gerardine Doyle; James Fullam; Barbara Kondilis; Demosthenes Agrafiotis; Ellen Uiters; Maria Falcon; Monika Mensing; Kancho Tchamov; Stephan van den Broucke; Helmut Brand Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2015-04-05 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Dean Schillinger; Kevin Grumbach; John Piette; Frances Wang; Dennis Osmond; Carolyn Daher; Jorge Palacios; Gabriela Diaz Sullivan; Andrew B Bindman Journal: JAMA Date: 2002 Jul 24-31 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: W Maier; R Holle; M Hunger; A Peters; C Meisinger; K H Greiser; A Kluttig; H Völzke; S Schipf; S Moebus; B Bokhof; K Berger; G Mueller; W Rathmann; T Tamayo; A Mielck Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Olga Maria Domanska; Christiane Firnges; Torsten Michael Bollweg; Kristine Sørensen; Christine Holmberg; Susanne Jordan Journal: Arch Public Health Date: 2018-07-10
Authors: Daniel Tajdar; Ingmar Schäfer; Dagmar Lühmann; Regina Fertmann; Tim Steinberg; Hendrik van den Bussche; Martin Scherer Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 3.249