Literature DB >> 33726695

RubiN - continuous care in regional networks: a study protocol for a prospective controlled trial.

Simone Gloystein1, Friederike Thomé2, Katja Goetz3, Nicole Warkentin3, Karola Mergenthal4, Fabian Engler4, Volker Amelung5, Matthias Arnold5, Felix Freigang5, Ann-Kathrin Klähn5, Sonja Laag6, Neeltje van den Berg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The health care situation of geriatric patients is often multifaceted, complex and often overlaps with social living conditions. Due to the lack of cross-sectoral and interprofessional health care geriatric patients often, receive insufficient care. Only a holistic view enables a comprehensive evaluation of the complex health risks, but also the potential to preserve the health of geriatric patients. The implementation of cross-sectoral, multi-professional case management could reduce the gaps in care, improve the autonomy of the geriatric patients in their own homes, and allow them to retain it as long as possible. The "RubiN" project examines the effects of multi-professional, cross-sectoral and assessment-based case management on the quality of the care of geriatric patients. The results of the study aim to show whether geriatric patients receive better care using case management than patients who receive standard health care. In addition, data on the effects of case management on practices of general practitioners (GP), the satisfaction with the care concept amongst the case managers, patients and relatives will be collected. Furthermore, a health economic analysis will be carried out.
METHODS: The project is designed as a prospective controlled study and compares geriatric patients from practice networks in different regions in Germany. Inclusion criteria are: Age ≥ 70 years and care requirements from two different care complexes (identified with the screening instrument 'Angelina'-questionnaire). The intervention is the use of a geriatric case management, where health care is organised based on patient-specific care requirements. Five practice networks of physicians will implement the intervention (n = 3200 patients) and three practice networks will serve as the control group (n = 1200 patients). The primary endpoint is the ability to manage activities of daily living, measured using the Barthel Index. The patients in the intervention group receive geriatric case management and the patients in the control networks receive standard care ("care as usual"). The analysis of the primary data, which is pseudonymised, occurs according to the intention-to-treat principle. For this purpose, the endpoints will be analysed using a group comparison after 12 months. For the health economic analysis, secondary data from the statutory health insurance providers will be included in the analysis, in addition to the primary data. Data for the analysis of the effects the concept has on the GP practices as well as on the satisfaction of the project participants will be collected with questionnaires and interviews with experts. DISCUSSION: The implementation of cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary geriatric case management has been a topic of discussion for years, whereby positive effects have already been-shown. This planned study will be the first evaluation of the effect of case management for geriatric patients with a very large sample. In addition, the effects of case management on the GP practices and also on the relatives of the geriatric patients will be shown. It is intended that the study results pave the way for a widespread implementation of this concept. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, ID: DRKS00016642 . Registered on 29 October 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Case management; Geriatric assessment; Geriatric care; Health services research; Interdisciplinary; Interprofessional cooperation; Regional health care; Regional networking

Year:  2021        PMID: 33726695      PMCID: PMC7962254          DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02106-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Geriatr        ISSN: 1471-2318            Impact factor:   3.921


  14 in total

Review 1.  Problems in determining occurrence rates of multimorbidity.

Authors:  M van den Akker; F Buntinx; S Roos; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  [The Barthel Index in geriatrics. A context analysis for the Hamburg Classification Manual].

Authors:  Norbert Lübke; Matthias Meinck; Wolfgang Von Renteln-Kruse
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.281

3.  [Demographic change and disease rates: a projection until 2050].

Authors:  E Peters; R Pritzkuleit; F Beske; A Katalinic
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  [Memorandum III, Part 3: Quality of Care and Patient Safety Research Methods].

Authors:  Max Geraedts; Saskia E Drösler; Klaus Döbler; Maria Eberlein-Gonska; Günther Heller; Silke Kuske; Tanja Manser; Brigitte Sens; Jürgen Stausberg; Matthias Schrappe
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2017-09-28

Review 5.  [Case management studies for individuals 65 years and older in Germany: Systematic review of the currently published state of research].

Authors:  Beate Gaertner; Anna Herzog; Martin Holzhausen; Stefan Schmidt
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 1.281

6.  [Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): guidelines and recommendations].

Authors:  E Swart; H Gothe; S Geyer; J Jaunzeme; B Maier; T G Grobe; P Ihle
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2015-01-26

7.  [Group Discussions in Health Services Research - Part 1: Introduction and Deliberations on Selection of Method and Planning].

Authors:  Nadine Janis Pohontsch; Veronika Müller; Susanne Brandner; Christoph Karlheim; Saskia Jünger; Katharina Klindtworth; Maren Stamer; Nicole Höfling-Engels; Vera Kleineke; Benigna Brandt; Margret Xyländer; Christiane Patzelt; Thorsten Meyer
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2017-05-12

8.  Case management for depression by health care assistants in small primary care practices: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Jochen Gensichen; Michael von Korff; Monika Peitz; Christiane Muth; Martin Beyer; Corina Güthlin; Marion Torge; Juliana J Petersen; Thomas Rosemann; Jochem König; Ferdinand M Gerlach
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Primary care practice-based care management for chronically ill patients (PraCMan): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN56104508].

Authors:  Tobias Freund; Frank Peters-Klimm; Justine Rochon; Cornelia Mahler; Jochen Gensichen; Antje Erler; Martin Beyer; Annika Baldauf; Ferdinand M Gerlach; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Guidelines and recommendations for ensuring Good Epidemiological Practice (GEP): a guideline developed by the German Society for Epidemiology.

Authors:  Wolfgang Hoffmann; Ute Latza; Sebastian E Baumeister; Martin Brünger; Nina Buttmann-Schweiger; Juliane Hardt; Verena Hoffmann; André Karch; Adrian Richter; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Irene Schmidtmann; Enno Swart; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.