Literature DB >> 28499321

[Group Discussions in Health Services Research - Part 1: Introduction and Deliberations on Selection of Method and Planning].

Nadine Janis Pohontsch1, Veronika Müller2, Susanne Brandner3, Christoph Karlheim4, Saskia Jünger5, Katharina Klindtworth6, Maren Stamer7, Nicole Höfling-Engels8, Vera Kleineke9, Benigna Brandt10, Margret Xyländer9, Christiane Patzelt11, Thorsten Meyer9.   

Abstract

Health services researchers focus on the players, structures and impact of health care in "real life". They investigate how social aspects, financing, organizational structures, technologies and personal attitudes affect the process and outcomes of health care. Qualitative research methods are used here, which address how people act according to their unique living conditions (outside the context of experimental studies). Different methods of debriefing groups are essential for qualitative health services research. In 2 subsequent articles, we aim to outline the diverse facets and possible range of implementation of the above-mentioned methods, in order to highlight the potential of debriefing groups in health services research (focus groups or group discussions) using these methods. In the current article, we would like to encourage researchers to reflect on relevant topics such as the selection of an appropriate method, the planning and undertaking of investigations including sampling methods, and questions regarding ethics and privacy. A follow-up article (in preparation) will deal with theoretical considerations of the term "group", as well as with the process of moderating discussions, methods of analyzing data and (qualitative) online research. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28499321     DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-104379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  9 in total

1.  Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness.

Authors:  Hannah Seipp; Jörg Haasenritter; Michaela Hach; Dorothée Becker; Dania Schütze; Jennifer Engler; Cornelia Ploeger; Stefan Bösner; Katrin Kuss
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.113

2.  [What motivates patients with atopic diseases to search the internet-a focus group study on expectations and demands].

Authors:  K Drixler; E Luntz; R Wiedemann; J Lander; I Schäfer; J Schmitt; M-L Dierks; E M Bitzer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Place of death and associated factors in 12 Latin American countries: A total population study using death certificate data.

Authors:  Katja Seitz; Joachim Cohen; Luc Deliens; Andrea Cartin; Celina Castañeda de la Lanza; Emanuel A Cardozo; Fernando Ci Marcucci; Leticia Viana; Luís F Rodrigues; Marvin Colorado; Victor R Samayoa; Vilma A Tripodoro; Ximena Pozo; Tania Pastrana
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 7.664

4.  RubiN - continuous care in regional networks: a study protocol for a prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Simone Gloystein; Friederike Thomé; Katja Goetz; Nicole Warkentin; Karola Mergenthal; Fabian Engler; Volker Amelung; Matthias Arnold; Felix Freigang; Ann-Kathrin Klähn; Sonja Laag; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Electronic patient record and its effects on social aspects of interprofessional collaboration and clinical workflows in hospitals (eCoCo): a mixed methods study protocol.

Authors:  Marina Beckmann; Kerstin Dittmer; Julia Jaschke; Ute Karbach; Juliane Köberlein-Neu; Maya Nocon; Carsten Rusniok; Florian Wurster; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Interprofessional collaboration to support patients with social problems in general practice-a qualitative focus group study.

Authors:  Thomas Kloppe; Britta Tetzlaff; Claudia Mews; Thomas Zimmermann; Martin Scherer
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-07-04

7.  Insights from a community-based palliative care course: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tania Pastrana; Johannes Wüller; Simone Weyers; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Influences on students' empathy in medical education: an exploratory interview study with medical students in their third and last year.

Authors:  N J Pohontsch; A Stark; M Ehrhardt; T Kötter; M Scherer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  "And Then He Got into the Wrong Group": A Qualitative Study Exploring the Effects of Randomization in Recruitment to a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Birthe Andrea Lehmann; Lara Lindert; Silke Ohlmeier; Lara Schlomann; Holger Pfaff; Kyung-Eun Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.