| Literature DB >> 33725189 |
Sarah C Scharm1, Jens Vogel-Claussen1,2, Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop3,4, Sabine Dettmer1,2, Lars Knudsen2,5, Danny Jonigk2,6, Jan Fuge2,7, Rosa-Marie Apel2,7, Tobias Welte2,7, Frank Wacker1,2, Antje Prasse2,7, Hoen-Oh Shin8,9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The individual course of disease in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is highly variable. Assessment of disease activity and prospective estimation of disease progression might have the potential to improve therapy management and indicate the onset of treatment at an earlier stage. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether regional ventilation, lung perfusion, and late enhancement can serve as early imaging markers for disease progression in patients with IPF.Entities:
Keywords: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Image processing, computer-assisted; Multidetector computed tomography; Perfusion imaging; Pulmonary ventilation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33725189 PMCID: PMC8379131 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07798-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Fig. 1Ventilation-perfusion-late enhancement CT (VPL-CT) Ventilation, lung perfusion, and late enhancement images were calculated from the VPL-CT. The VNC images in inspiration were registered to the VNC images in expiration. The VNC inspiration and lung perfusion images were transformed to match the expiration scan (VNC inspiration warped and lung perfusion warped, respectively). The inverse Jacobian determinant was used to calculate the regional ventilation from the VNC images in inspiration and expiration. The intensities of the CT-derived functional parameter images are illustrated in color
Fig. 2Flowchart depicting exclusion criteria. In 2 of the 37 patients primarily included, no PFT was performed within 2 months after the CT examination. Three patients were excluded due to registration errors. The FVC, lung volume, and mean lung density measurements were available for the remaining 32 patients. For 6 patients, the DLCO values were missing
Patient population characteristics. The population predominantly consisted of elderly men. Most patients were under antifibrotic treatment
| Parameter | No. |
|---|---|
| No. of patients | 32 |
| Sex | |
| Men | 28 |
| Women | 4 |
| Age (years) | 70 ± 10 |
| Smoking status | |
| Never | 13 |
| Former | 18 |
| Current | 1 |
| Antifibrotic medication | 21 |
| Mean time between baseline and follow-up CT (months) | 15.4 ± 6.7 |
| Mean time between CT and PFT at baseline (days) | 14 ± 13 |
| Mean time between CT and PFT at follow-up (days) | 13 ± 15 |
Reference parameters at baseline and follow-up. All parameters were significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) between the two time points
| Reference parameters | Baseline | Follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| FVC% | 69.75 ± 17.25 | 64.43 ± 15.98 | 0.009 |
| DLCO% | 52.58 ± 14.55 | 43.76 ± 12.36 | 0.000 |
| lung volume (in mL) | 3942.09 ± 844.33 | 3719.76 ± 869.13 | 0.001 |
| mean lung density (in HU) | - 742.23 ± 51.05 | - 728.30 ± 62.30 | 0.016 |
Fig. 3Histograms of functional CT parameters. a Regional ventilation (fractional air volume change between inspiration and expiration), (b) lung perfusion (percentage of vessel contrast), and (c) late enhancement (percentage of vessel contrast in the delayed scan)
Fig. 4Functional CT parameters in different density areas. Mean values of regional ventilation (a), lung perfusion (b), and late enhancement (c) compared in normal-attenuation areas (- 950 to - 600 HU) and high-attenuation areas (- 600 to - 250 HU) for all patients
Correlation analysis results. Longitudinal correlation of functional CT parameters with FVC%, DLCO%, segmented lung volume, and mean lung density. Significant results are italicized; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; b, baseline; f, follow-up; f/b, ratio follow-up/baseline
| Reference parameters | Mean regional ventilation | Mean lung perfusion | Mean late enhancement | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVC % b | 0.183 | 0.316 | −0.322 | 0.072 | ||
| FVC % f/b | 0.053 | 0.773 | −0.068 | 0.710 | ||
| DLCO % b | −0.185 | 0.366 | 0.163 | 0.425 | −0.362 | 0.070 |
| DLCO % f/b | −0.207 | 0.309 | −0.145 | 0.480 | −0.090 | 0.662 |
| Lung volume b | 0.102 | 0.578 | ||||
| Lung volume f/b | −0.200 | 0.272 | ||||
| Mean lung density b | 0.020 | 0.912 | ||||
| Mean lung density f/b | −0.122 | 0.507 |
Fig. 5Scatterplots of the correlation analysis. Regional ventilation, lung perfusion, and late enhancement vs baseline values and ratios (follow-up/baseline) of FVC% (a), DLCO% (b), lung volume (c), and mean lung density (d). Significant correlations are highlighted in grey (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). Least-square lines are superimposed on each plot
Fig. 6Baseline scans of a patient with stable disease (upper row, a–d) and a patient with progressive disease (lower row, e–h). The images are presented in the following order: CT in inspiration, CT in expiration, regional ventilation, and late enhancement. Stable patient mean regional ventilation 0.51; mean late enhancement 24%; baseline/follow-up values FVC% 73%/85%; lung volume 4269 mL/ 4549 mL; mean lung density - 812 HU/-827 HU. Progressing patient mean regional ventilation 0.76; mean late enhancement 52%; baseline/follow-up values FVC% 79%/57%; lung volume 3823 mL/ 3058 mL; mean lung density - 749 HU/− 677 HU. The patient in the upper row showed a low disease activity, as indicated in the regional ventilation and late enhancement images. FVC% and the mean lung volume and density values even improved with antifibrotic therapy. The patient in the lower row presented much higher ventilation and late enhancement values in the baseline scan, resulting in disease progression in the follow-up’s reference parameters