Literature DB >> 33724371

Direct and ambient light pollution alters recruitment for a diurnal plant-pollinator system.

Ashley A Wilson1, Brett M Seymoure2,3, Sierra Jaeger1, Briana Milstead1, Helen Payne1, Lindsay Peria1, Ryan Vosbigian1, Clinton D Francis1.   

Abstract

Artificial light at night (ALAN) functions as a novel environmental stimulus that has the potential to disrupt interactions among species. Despite recent efforts to explain nocturnal pollinators' responses to this stimulus, the likelihood and associated mechanisms of attraction towards artificial light and potential consequences on fitness for diurnal pollinators is still largely unclear. Here, we took advantage of the obligate mutualism between yucca moths (Tegeticula maculata maculata) and yucca plants (Hesperoyucca whipplei) to understand how direct light exposure and skyglow can influence a pairwise plant-pollinator interaction. To surmise whether adult moths exhibit positive phototaxis, we deployed a set of field-placed light towers during the peak of yucca flowering and compared the number of moths caught in traps between dark-controlled and light-treated trials. Adult moth abundance was much higher when light was present, which suggests that ALAN may alter this diurnal moth's activity patterns to expand their temporal niche into the night. To evaluate ALAN effects on yucca fruit set and moth larva recruitment, we measured skyglow exposure above yucca plants and direct light intensity from a second set of light towers. Both larva and fruit recruitment increased with skyglow, and fruit set also increased with direct lighting, but the relationship was weaker. Contrarily, larva recruitment did not change when exposed to a gradient of direct light, which may instead reflect effects of ALAN on moth physiology, such as disrupted female oviposition, or misdirecting behaviors essential to oviposition activity. Our results suggest that ALAN can positively influence the fitness of both plants and moths in this tightly co-evolved mutualism, but the benefits to each species may depend on whether night lighting is direct or indirect. Whether such effects and mechanisms could relate to susceptibility to the presence of ALAN on this or other plant-pollinator relationships will remain an important focus of future research.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial light at night; diurnal pollinator; plant-pollinator communities; positive phototaxis; recruitment

Year:  2021        PMID: 33724371     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icab010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  2 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Caroline T Dressler; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Towards an absolute light pollution indicator.

Authors:  Philippe Deverchère; Sébastien Vauclair; Gonzague Bosch; Sylvain Moulherat; Jérémie H Cornuau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.