Literature DB >> 3372392

Effects of additives on in vitro ruminal fermentation: a comparison of monensin and bacitracin, another gram-positive antibiotic.

J B Russell1, H J Strobel.   

Abstract

Mixed ruminal bacteria (n = 4) were incubated in anaerobic media for 24 h in vitro with either hay, corn meal, protein hydrolyzate or hydrogen gas as the substrate. The ionophore monensin and the polypeptide antibiotic bacitracin were added to the incubation flasks at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10 or 40 mg/liter. As was expected, monensin decreased methane production, increased the ratio of propionate to acetate and decreased the deamination of amino acids. Monensin had little effect on methane production, however, if hydrogen gas was the fermentation substrate. Bacitracin, another gram-positive antibiotic with a distinctly different cellular target, was somewhat less potent than monensin, but it produced strikingly similar responses. This similarity of fermentation patterns suggested that monensin action in the rumen is probably due to its activity as a gram-positive antibiotic, and that any gram-positive antibiotic not suppressed by resistance may produce fermentation effects similar to those of monensin. The cellular action of monensin as an ionophore in membranes is probably little more than a means of inhibiting sensitive species. Many gram-positive antibiotics have little affect on ciliate protozoa or coccidia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3372392     DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.662552x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

Review 1.  Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  J B Russell; H J Strobel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Control of rumen methanogenesis.

Authors:  C J Van Nevel; D I Demeyer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Effect of pH and Monensin on Glucose Transport by Fibrobacter succinogenes, a Cellulolytic Ruminal Bacterium.

Authors:  J M Chow; J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effects of supplements containing different additives on nutritional and productive performance of beef cattle grazing tropical grass.

Authors:  V V Carvalho; M F Paulino; E Detmann; M L Chizzotti; L S Martins; A G Silva; S A Lopes; F H Moura
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  The effect of encapsulated nitrate and monensin on ruminal fermentation using a semi-continuous culture system.

Authors:  Matheus Capelari; Kristen A Johnson; Brooke Latack; Jolene Roth; Wendy Powers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effect of ionophores and pH on growth of Streptococcus bovis in batch and continuous culture.

Authors:  J M Chow; J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  An rRNA approach for assessing the role of obligate amino acid-fermenting bacteria in ruminal amino acid deamination.

Authors:  D O Krause; J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Use of potassium depletion to assess adaptation of ruminal bacteria to ionophores.

Authors:  R P Lana; J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Effect of sodium monensin and cinnamaldehyde on the growth and phenotypic characteristics of Prevotella bryantii and Prevotella ruminicola.

Authors:  D Ferme; M Malnersic; L Lipoglavsek; C Kamel; G Avgustin
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.099

10.  Interactions between Euphorbia esula toxins and bovine ruminal microbes.

Authors:  Scott L Kronberg; Fathi T Halaweish; Mindy B Hubert; Paul J Weimer
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-02-26       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.