Literature DB >> 24193494

Control of rumen methanogenesis.

C J Van Nevel1, D I Demeyer.   

Abstract

During the last decades, considerable research on methane production in the rumen and its inhibition has been carried out. Initially, as methane production represents a significant loss of gross energy in the feed (2-15%), the ultimate goal of such intervention in rumen fermentation was an increase in feed efficiency. A second reason favouring research on methane inhibition is its role in the global warming phenomenon and in the destruction of the ozone layer. In this review, the authors describe briefly several interventions for reducing methane emission by ruminants. The objective can be reached by intervention at the dietary level by ration manipulation (composition, feeding level) or by the use of additives or supplements. Examples of additives are polyhalogenated compounds, ionophores and other antibiotics. Supplementation of the ration with lipids also lowered methanogenesis. More biotechnological interventions, e.g., defaunation, probiotics and introduction of reductive acetogenesis in the rumen, are also mentioned. It can be concluded that drastic inhibition of methane production is not unequivocally successful as a result of several factors, such as: instantaneous inhibition often followed by restoration of methanogenesis due to adaptation of the microbes or degradation of the additive, toxicity for the host animal, negative effects on overall digestion and productive performance. Therefore, methanogenesis and its inhibition cannot be considered as a separate part of rumen fermentation and its consequences on the animal should be taken into account.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24193494     DOI: 10.1007/BF00394043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  75 in total

Review 1.  Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation.

Authors:  J B Russell; H J Strobel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of low-roughage diets on the microflora and lipid metabolism in the rumen.

Authors:  M J Latham; J E Storry; M E Sharpe
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-12

Review 3.  The autotrophic pathway of acetate synthesis in acetogenic bacteria.

Authors:  L G Ljungdahl
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Postprandial changes in methanogenic and acidogenic bacteria in the rumens of steers fed high- or low-forage diets once daily.

Authors:  J A Leedle; R C Greening
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  A simple method for the simultaneous determination of gas production and volatile fatty acid concentration in the rumen.

Authors:  C J Van Nevel; D I Demeyer; H K Henderickx; J A Martin
Journal:  Z Tierphysiol Tierernahr Futtermittelkd       Date:  1970-03

6.  New inhibitors of methane production by rumen micro-organisms. Experiments with animals and other practical possibilities.

Authors:  J W Czerkawski; G Breckenridge
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Influence of lasalocid and monensin plus tylosin on comparative feeding value of steam-flaked versus dry-rolled corn in diets for feedlot cattle.

Authors:  R A Zinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effects of additives on in vitro ruminal fermentation: a comparison of monensin and bacitracin, another gram-positive antibiotic.

Authors:  J B Russell; H J Strobel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Laidlomycin butyrate--an ionophore with enhanced intraruminal activity.

Authors:  H R Spires; J W Algeo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Binding of radiolabeled monensin and lasalocid to ruminal microorganisms and feed.

Authors:  J M Chow; J A Van Kessel; J B Russell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  31 in total

1.  Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew J Williams; Barbara Winder; Claus T Christophersen; Sharon L Rodgers; Kellie D Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Enteric methane mitigation technologies for ruminant livestock: a synthesis of current research and future directions.

Authors:  Amlan Kumar Patra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Methane emissions of differently fed dairy cows and corresponding methane and nitrogen emissions from their manure during storage.

Authors:  D R Külling; Frigga Dohme; H Menz; F Sutter; P Lischer; M Kreuzer
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Effects of diet type on nutrient utilization and energy balance in drylot heifers1.

Authors:  Jessica R Baber; Tryon A Wickersham; Jason E Sawyer; Harvey C Freetly; Tami M Brown-Brandl; Kristin E Hales
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Immune status and haemato-biochemical profile of buffalo calves supplemented with phytogenic feed additives rich in tannins, saponins and essential oils.

Authors:  Neeti Lakhani; Devki Nandan Kamra; Preeti Lakhani; Mohanned Naif Alhussien
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 1.559

6.  In vitro reduction of methane production by 3-nitro-1-propionic acid is dose-dependent1.

Authors:  Pedro Antonio Ochoa-García; Martha María Arevalos-Sánchez; Oscar Ruiz-Barrera; Robin C Anderson; Adrián Omar Maynez-Pérez; Felipe A Rodríguez-Almeida; América Chávez-Martínez; Héctor Gutiérrez-Bañuelos; Agustín Corral-Luna
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Rumen methanogenic genotypes differ in abundance according to host residual feed intake phenotype and diet type.

Authors:  Ciara A Carberry; Sinéad M Waters; Sinead M Waters; David A Kenny; Christopher J Creevey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate-fumaric Acid coupled addition on the in vitro rumen fermentation with special regard to methanogenesis.

Authors:  M A Abdl-Rahman; F A R Sawiress; A M Abd El-Aty
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2009-10-29

9.  Effect of plant oils and organic acids on rumen fermentation in vitro.

Authors:  D Jalc; S Kisidayová; F Nerud
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.099

10.  The benefits of supplementary fat in feed rations for ruminants with particular focus on reducing levels of methane production.

Authors:  J Rasmussen; A Harrison
Journal:  ISRN Vet Sci       Date:  2011-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.