Literature DB >> 33723066

Testosterone reduces generosity through cortical and subcortical mechanisms.

Jianxin Ou1,2, Yin Wu3,2, Yang Hu4,5, Xiaoxue Gao4, Hong Li6,7, Philippe N Tobler8.   

Abstract

Recent evidence has linked testosterone, a major sex hormone, to selfishness in economic decision-making. Here, we aimed to investigate the neural mechanisms through which testosterone reduces generosity by combining functional MRI with pharmacological manipulation among healthy young males in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-subject design. After testosterone or placebo gel administration, participants performed a social discounting task in which they chose between selfish options (benefiting only the participant) and generous options (providing also some benefit to another person at a particular social distance). At the behavioral level, testosterone reduced generosity compared to the placebo. At the neural level (n = 60), the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) encoded the other-regarding value of the generous option during generous choices, and this effect was attenuated by testosterone, suggesting that testosterone reduced the consideration of other's welfare as underpinned by TPJ activity. Moreover, TPJ activity more strongly reflected individual differences in generosity in the placebo than the testosterone group. Furthermore, testosterone weakened the relation between the other-regarding value of generous decisions and connectivity between the TPJ and a region extending from the insula into the striatum. Together, these findings suggest that a network encompassing both cortical and subcortical components underpins the effects of testosterone on social preferences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  altruistic preferences; androgen; prosocial behavior; social cognition; temporoparietal junction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33723066      PMCID: PMC8000274          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021745118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  39 in total

1.  Testosterone and estrogen impact social evaluations and vicarious emotions: A double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Andreas Olsson; Eleni Kopsida; Kimmo Sorjonen; Ivanka Savic
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-01-11

Review 2.  Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors.

Authors:  Gabriele Bellucci; Julia A Camilleri; Simon B Eickhoff; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  The dopaminergic reward system underpins gender differences in social preferences.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Christopher J Burke; Anjali Raja Beharelle; Robert Schreiber; Susanna C Weber; Iliana I Karipidis; Jolien Ten Velden; Bernd Weber; Helene Haker; Tobias Kalenscher; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-10-09

4.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) and psychopathic traits moderate the effect of exogenous testosterone on socio-cognitive processes in men.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Triana L Ortiz; Brandy Labine; Benjamin J P Moreau; Essi Viding; Craig S Neumann; Bernard Goldfarb
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.905

5.  Testosterone inhibits trust but promotes reciprocity.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Pranjal H Mehta; Bram Van den Bergh; Veerle van Son; Stefan T Trautmann; Karin Roelofs; Ale Smidts; Alan G Sanfey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09-26

6.  Friends and foes: Neural correlates of prosocial decisions with peers in adolescence.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schreuders; Sanny Smeekens; Antonius H N Cillessen; Berna Güroğlu
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Testosterone administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio.

Authors:  Jack van Honk; Dennis J Schutter; Peter A Bos; Anne-Wil Kruijt; Eef G Lentjes; Simon Baron-Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Single dose testosterone administration modulates emotional reactivity and counterfactual choice in healthy males.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Luke Clark; Samuele Zilioli; Christoph Eisenegger; Claire M Gillan; Huihua Deng; Hong Li
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.905

9.  Friend versus foe: Neural correlates of prosocial decisions for liked and disliked peers.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schreuders; Eduard T Klapwijk; Geert-Jan Will; Berna Güroğlu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Testosterone administration decreases generosity in the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Paul J Zak; Robert Kurzban; Sheila Ahmadi; Ronald S Swerdloff; Jang Park; Levan Efremidze; Karen Redwine; Karla Morgan; William Matzner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.752

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Indoor Air Pollution and Decision-Making Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review.

Authors:  German Torres; Mervat Mourad; Joerg R Leheste
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.