Literature DB >> 31024122

The dopaminergic reward system underpins gender differences in social preferences.

Alexander Soutschek1, Christopher J Burke2, Anjali Raja Beharelle2, Robert Schreiber2, Susanna C Weber2, Iliana I Karipidis2,3,4, Jolien Ten Velden2,5, Bernd Weber6,7, Helene Haker8, Tobias Kalenscher9, Philippe N Tobler2,4.   

Abstract

Women are known to have stronger prosocial preferences than men, but it remains an open question as to how these behavioural differences arise from differences in brain functioning. Here, we provide a neurobiological account for the hypothesized gender difference. In a pharmacological study and an independent neuroimaging study, we tested the hypothesis that the neural reward system encodes the value of sharing money with others more strongly in women than in men. In the pharmacological study, we reduced receptor type-specific actions of dopamine, a neurotransmitter related to reward processing, which resulted in more selfish decisions in women and more prosocial decisions in men. Converging findings from an independent neuroimaging study revealed gender-related activity in neural reward circuits during prosocial decisions. Thus, the neural reward system appears to be more sensitive to prosocial rewards in women than in men, providing a neurobiological account for why women often behave more prosocially than men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 31024122     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0226-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  22 in total

1.  Effects of a dopamine agonist on trusting behaviors in females.

Authors:  Gabriele Bellucci; Thomas F Münte; Soyoung Q Park
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Sex-dependent regulation of social reward by oxytocin receptors in the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  Johnathan M Borland; Lauren M Aiani; Alisa Norvelle; Kymberly N Grantham; Kylie O'Laughlin; Joseph I Terranova; Kyle J Frantz; H Elliott Albers
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 3.  Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Dennison; Daniel Sazhin; David V Smith
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  Exogenous testosterone increases the audience effect in healthy males: evidence for the social status hypothesis.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Yinhua Zhang; Jianxin Ou; Yang Hu; Samuele Zilioli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Testosterone reduces generosity through cortical and subcortical mechanisms.

Authors:  Jianxin Ou; Yin Wu; Yang Hu; Xiaoxue Gao; Hong Li; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  The effects of psychosocial stress on intergroup resource allocation.

Authors:  Adam Schweda; Nadira Sophie Faber; Molly J Crockett; Tobias Kalenscher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Using pharmacological manipulations to study the role of dopamine in human reward functioning: A review of studies in healthy adults.

Authors:  Heather E Webber; Paula Lopez-Gamundi; Sydney N Stamatovich; Harriet de Wit; Margaret C Wardle
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Human complex exploration strategies are enriched by noradrenaline-modulated heuristics.

Authors:  Magda Dubois; Johanna Habicht; Jochen Michely; Rani Moran; Ray J Dolan; Tobias U Hauser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  10,000 social brains: Sex differentiation in human brain anatomy.

Authors:  Hannah Kiesow; Robin I M Dunbar; Joseph W Kable; Tobias Kalenscher; Kai Vogeley; Leonhard Schilbach; Andre F Marquand; Thomas V Wiecki; Danilo Bzdok
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Enhancement in dopamine reduces generous behaviour in women.

Authors:  Sergio Oroz Artigas; Lu Liu; Sabrina Strang; Caroline Burrasch; Astrid Hermsteiner; Thomas F Münte; Soyoung Q Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.