Literature DB >> 33722208

Evaluation of direct and maternal responses in reproduction traits based on different selection strategies for postnatal piglet survival in a selection experiment.

Tuan Q Nguyen1,2, Pieter W Knap3, Geoff Simm4, Sandra A Edwards5, Rainer Roehe6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postnatal piglet survival is important both in economic and animal welfare terms. It is influenced by the piglet's own direct genetic effects and by maternal genetic effects of the dam, associated with milk production and mothering abilities. These genetic effects might be correlated, affected by other non-genetic factors and unfavourably associated with other reproduction traits such as litter size, which makes the development of optimal breeding strategies a challenge. To identify the optimum selection strategy for piglet survival, a selection experiment was carried out to compare responses in survival and reproduction traits to selection on only direct, only maternal, or both genetic effects of postnatal survival. The data of the experiment were recorded from outdoor reared pigs, with first- and second-generation sires selected based on their estimated breeding values for maternal and direct effects of postnatal survival of indoor reared offspring, respectively, with the opportunity to identify potential genotype-by-environment interaction.
RESULTS: A Bayesian multivariate threshold-linear model that was fitted to data on 22,483 piglets resulted in significant (Pr(h2 > 0) = 1.00) estimates of maternal and direct heritabilities between 0.12 and 0.18 for survival traits and between 0.29 and 0.36 for birth weight, respectively. Selection for direct genetic effects resulted in direct and maternal responses in postnatal survival of 1.11% ± 0.17 and - 0.49% ± 0.10, respectively, while selection for maternal genetic effects led to greater direct and maternal responses, of 5.20% ± 0.34 and 1.29% ± 0.20, respectively, in part due to unintentional within-litter selection. Selection for both direct and maternal effects revealed a significant lower direct response (- 1.04% ± 0.12) in comparison to its expected response from single-effect selection, caused by interactions between direct and maternal effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Selection successfully improved post- and perinatal survival and birth weight, which indicates that they are genetically determined and that genotype-by-environment interactions between outdoor (experimental data) and indoor (selection data) housed pigs were not important for these traits. A substantially increased overall (direct plus maternal) response was obtained using selection for maternal versus direct or both direct and maternal effects, suggesting that the maternal genetic effects are the main limiting factor for improving piglet survival on which selection pressure should be emphasized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33722208      PMCID: PMC7958901          DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00612-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


  28 in total

1.  Economic weights for maternal traits of sows, including sow longevity.

Authors:  P R Amer; C I Ludemann; S Hermesch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Variance and covariance components for liability of piglet survival during different periods.

Authors:  G Su; D Sorensen; M S Lund
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genetics of growth in piglets and the association with homogeneity of body weight within litters.

Authors:  L Canario; H Lundgren; M Haandlykken; L Rydhmer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Correlated responses for litter traits to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in French Large White pigs.

Authors:  A Rosendo; T Druet; J Gogué; L Canario; J P Bidanel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Intrauterine growth retardation detected in several species by non-normal birthweight distributions.

Authors:  R Wootton; P A Flecknell; J P Royston; M John
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1983-11

6.  The influence of maternal effects on accuracy of evaluation of litter size in swine.

Authors:  R Roehe; B W Kennedy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effect of selection for maternal and direct genetic effects on genetic improvement of litter size in swine.

Authors:  R Roehe; B W Kennedy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.

Authors:  A M Putz; F Tiezzi; C Maltecca; K A Gray; M T Knauer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Genetic heteroscedastic models for ordinal traits: application to sheep litter size.

Authors:  Samira Fathallah; Loys Bodin; Ingrid David
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genetic selection against intrauterine growth retardation in piglets: a problem at the piglet level with a solution at the sow level.

Authors:  Stephanie M Matheson; Grant A Walling; Sandra A Edwards
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genetic Analyses of Rabbit Survival and Individual Birth Weight.

Authors:  Rafik Belabbas; Rym Ezzeroug; Ali Berbar; María de la Luz Garcia; Ghania Zitouni; Djamel Taalaziza; Zoulikha Boudjella; Nassima Boudahdir; Samir Diss; María-José Argente
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.