Literature DB >> 26641035

Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.

A M Putz, F Tiezzi, C Maltecca, K A Gray, M T Knauer.   

Abstract

Litter size at d 5 (LS5) has been shown to be an effective trait to increase total number born (TNB) while simultaneously decreasing preweaning mortality. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal litter size day for selection (i.e., other than d 5). Traits included TNB, number born alive (NBA), litter size at d 2, 5, 10, 30 (LS2, LS5, LS10, LS30, respectively), litter size at weaning (LSW), number weaned (NW), piglet mortality at d 30 (MortD30), and average piglet birth weight (BirthWt). Litter size traits were assigned to biological litters and treated as a trait of the sow. In contrast, NW was the number of piglets weaned by the nurse dam. Bivariate animal models included farm, year-season, and parity as fixed effects. Number born alive was fit as a covariate for BirthWt. Random effects included additive genetics and the permanent environment of the sow. Variance components were plotted for TNB, NBA, and LS2 to LS30 using univariate animal models to determine how variances changed over time. Additive genetic variance was minimized at d 7 in Large White and at d 14 in Landrace pigs. Total phenotypic variance for litter size traits decreased over the first 10 d and then stabilized. Heritability estimates increased between TNB and LS30. Genetic correlations between TNB, NBA, and LS2 to LS29 with LS30 plateaued within the first 10 d. A genetic correlation with LS30 of 0.95 was reached at d 4 for Large White and at d 8 for Landrace pigs. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.07 to 0.13 for litter size traits and MortD30. Birth weight had an h of 0.24 and 0.26 for Large White and Landrace pigs, respectively. Genetic correlations among LS30, LSW, and NW ranged from 0.97 to 1.00. In the Large White breed, genetic correlations between MortD30 with TNB and LS30 were 0.23 and -0.64, respectively. These correlations were 0.10 and -0.61 in the Landrace breed. A high genetic correlation of 0.98 and 0.97 was observed between LS10 and NW for Large White and Landrace breeds, respectively. This would indicate that NW could possibly be used as an effective maternal trait, given a low level of cross-fostering, to avoid back calculating litter size traits from piglet records. Litter size at d 10 would be a compromise between gain in litter size at weaning and minimizing the potentially negative effects of the nurse dam and direct additive genetics of the piglets, as they are expected to increase throughout lactation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26641035     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  10 in total

1.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

2.  Genetic and phenotypic parameters for litter size, survival rate, gestation length, and litter weight traits in American mink.

Authors:  Karim Karimi; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Graham Stuart Plastow; Zhiquan Wang; Younes Miar
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Estimation of direct and maternal genetic parameters for individual birth weight, weaning weight, and probe weight in Yorkshire and Landrace pigs.

Authors:  Kristen Alves; Flavio S Schenkel; Luiz F Brito; Andy Robinson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genetic analysis for sow stayability at different parities in purebred Landrace and Large White pigs.

Authors:  Shinichiro Ogawa; Makoto Kimata; Kazuo Ishii; Yoshinobu Uemoto; Masahiro Satoh
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.974

5.  Variance components estimation for farrowing traits of three purebred pigs in Korea.

Authors:  Bryan Irvine Lopez; Tae Hun Kim; Milton Tinashe Makumbe; Chol Won Song; Kang Seok Seo
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Multiple-trait structured antedependence model to study the relationship between litter size and birth weight in pigs and rabbits.

Authors:  Ingrid David; Hervé Garreau; Elodie Balmisse; Yvon Billon; Laurianne Canario
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Inferring phenotypic causal structure among farrowing and weaning traits in pigs.

Authors:  Toshihiro Okamura; Kazuo Ishii; Motohide Nishio; Guilherme J M Rosa; Masahiro Satoh; Osamu Sasaki
Journal:  Anim Sci J       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.749

8.  Evaluation of direct and maternal responses in reproduction traits based on different selection strategies for postnatal piglet survival in a selection experiment.

Authors:  Tuan Q Nguyen; Pieter W Knap; Geoff Simm; Sandra A Edwards; Rainer Roehe
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  The effect of a porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome outbreak on genetic parameters and reaction norms for reproductive performance in pigs1.

Authors:  Austin M Putz; Clint R Schwab; Alysta D Sewell; Derald J Holtkamp; Jeffery J Zimmerman; Kimberlee Baker; Nick V L Serão; Jack C M Dekkers
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Additive and Dominance Genomic Analysis for Litter Size in Purebred and Crossbred Iberian Pigs.

Authors:  Houssemeddine Srihi; José Luis Noguera; Victoria Topayan; Melani Martín de Hijas; Noelia Ibañez-Escriche; Joaquim Casellas; Marta Vázquez-Gómez; María Martínez-Castillero; Juan Pablo Rosas; Luis Varona
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.