Literature DB >> 33721858

Computational investigation of the impact of deep brain stimulation contact size and shape on neural selectivity.

Daria Nesterovich Anderson1,2, Alan D Dorval3, John D Rolston1,3, Stefan M Pulst4, Collin J Anderson4.   

Abstract

Background.Understanding neural selectivity is essential for optimizing medical applications of deep brain stimulation (DBS). We previously showed that modulation of the DBS waveform can induce changes in orientation-based selectivity, and that lengthening of DBS pulses or directional segmentation can reduce preferential selectivity for large axons. In this work, we sought to investigate a simple, but important question from a generalized perspective: how do the size and shape of the contact influence neural selectivity?Methods.We created multicompartment neuron models for several axon diameters and used finite element modeling with standard-sized cylindrical leads to determine the effects on changing contact size and shape on axon activation profiles and volumes of tissue activated. Contacts ranged in size from 0.04 to 16 mm2, compared with a standard size of 6 mm2.Results.We found that changes in contact size are predicted to induce substantial changes in orientation-based selectivity in the context of a cylindrical lead, and changes in contact width or height can alter this selectivity. Smaller contact sizes were more effective in constraining neural activation to small, nearby axons. However, micro-scale contacts enable only limited spread of neural activation before exceeding standard charge density limitations; further, energetic efficiency is optimized by somewhat larger contacts.Interpretations.Small-scale contacts may be optimal for constraining stimulation in nearby grey matter and avoiding orientation-selective activation. However, given charge density limitations and energy inefficiency of micro-scale contacts, we predict that contacts sized similarly to or slightly smaller than segmented clinical leads may optimize energy efficiency while avoiding charge density limitations.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Parkinson’s disease; deep brain stimulation; directional electrodes; electrode design; movement disorders; neural selectivity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33721858      PMCID: PMC8440674          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abeeaa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  47 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Helen S Mayberg; Andres M Lozano; Valerie Voon; Heather E McNeely; David Seminowicz; Clement Hamani; Jason M Schwalb; Sidney H Kennedy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Christopher B Maks; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Deep-Brain Stimulation for Basal Ganglia Disorders.

Authors:  Thomas Wichmann; Mahlon R Delong
Journal:  Basal Ganglia       Date:  2011-07-01

4.  Neural selectivity, efficiency, and dose equivalence in deep brain stimulation through pulse width tuning and segmented electrodes.

Authors:  Collin J Anderson; Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Stefan M Pulst; Christopher R Butson; Alan D Dorval
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Neural stimulation and recording with bidirectional, soft carbon nanotube fiber microelectrodes.

Authors:  Flavia Vitale; Samantha R Summerson; Behnaam Aazhang; Caleb Kemere; Matteo Pasquali
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  In vitro comparison of sputtered iridium oxide and platinum-coated neural implantable microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  S Negi; R Bhandari; L Rieth; F Solzbacher
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 3.715

7.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus reestablishes neuronal information transmission in the 6-OHDA rat model of parkinsonism.

Authors:  Alan D Dorval; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves cognitive flexibility but impairs response inhibition in Parkinson disease.

Authors:  Karsten Witt; Ulrich Pulkowski; Jan Herzog; Delia Lorenz; Wolfgang Hamel; Günther Deuschl; Paul Krack
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-05

9.  Short pulse width widens the therapeutic window of subthalamic neurostimulation.

Authors:  Martin M Reich; Frank Steigerwald; Anna D Sawalhe; Rene Reese; Kabilar Gunalan; Silvia Johannes; Robert Nickl; Cordula Matthies; Cameron C McIntyre; Jens Volkmann
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 4.511

Review 10.  Dosing of Electrical Parameters in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Intractable Depression: A Review of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Stefan Lang; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.157

View more
  1 in total

1.  Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy.

Authors:  Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Chantel M Charlebois; Elliot H Smith; Amir M Arain; Tyler S Davis; John D Rolston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.