Literature DB >> 33721110

Leg length discrepancy, overgrowth, and associated risk factors after a pediatric tibial shaft fracture.

Woo Young Choi1, Moon Seok Park1, Kyoung Min Lee1, Kug Jin Choi1, Hyon Soo Jung1, Ki Hyuk Sung2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to investigate leg length discrepancy (LLD), overgrowth, and associated risk factors after pediatric tibial shaft fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 103 patients younger than 14 years of age (mean age 7.1 years; 75 boys, 28 girls) with unilateral tibial shaft fracture and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. LLD was calculated as the difference between the lengths of the injured and uninjured limbs. Overgrowth was calculated by adding the fracture site shortening from the LLD. Risk factors were assessed in patients with LLD < 1 cm and ≥ 1 cm and overgrowth < 1 cm and ≥ 1 cm.
RESULTS: Casting and titanium elastic nailing (TEN) were performed on 64 and 39 patients, respectively. The mean LLD and overgrowth were 5.6 and 6.4 mm, respectively. There were significant differences in sex (p = 0.018), age (p = 0.041), fibular involvement (p = 0.005), injury mechanism (p = 0.006), and treatment methods (p < 0.001) between patients with LLDs < 1 cm and ≥ 1 cm. There were significant differences in sex (p = 0.029), fibular involvement (p = 0.002), injury mechanism (p = 0.008), and treatment methods (p < 0.001) between patients with overgrowth < 1 cm and ≥ 1 cm. Sex and treatment methods were risk factors associated with LLD ≥ 1 cm and overgrowth ≥ 1 cm following pediatric tibial shaft fracture. The boys had a 7.4-fold higher risk of LLD ≥ 1 cm and 5.4-fold higher risk of overgrowth ≥ 1 cm than the girls. Patients who underwent TEN had a 4.3-fold higher risk of LLD ≥ 1 cm and 4.8-fold higher risk of overgrowth ≥ 1 cm than those treated by casting.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing TEN showed greater LLD and overgrowth than those undergoing casting, with boys showing greater LLD and overgrowth than girls. Surgeons should consider the possibility of LLD and overgrowth after pediatric tibial shaft fractures, especially when performing TEN for boys. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leg length discrepancy; Overgrowth; Pediatric; Tibial shaft fracture

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33721110      PMCID: PMC7960829          DOI: 10.1186/s10195-021-00575-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 1590-9921


  31 in total

1.  The most frequent traumatic orthopaedic injuries from a national pediatric inpatient population.

Authors:  Gregory J Galano; Mark A Vitale; Michael W Kessler; Joshua E Hyman; Michael G Vitale
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 2.  Tibial Shaft Fractures in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeremy E Raducha; Ishaan Swarup; Jonathan M Schachne; Aristides I Cruz; Peter D Fabricant
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2019-02

3.  Overgrowth of the Femur After Internal Fixation in Children With Femoral Shaft Fracture-A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kyeong-Hyeon Park; Byoung Kyu Park; Chang-Wug Oh; Dae-Wook Kim; Hoon Park; Kun-Bo Park
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Operative treatment of tibial fractures in children: are elastic stable intramedullary nails an improvement over external fixation?

Authors:  Erik N Kubiak; Kenneth A Egol; David Scher; Bradley Wasserman; David Feldman; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The effect of simulated leg length discrepancy on lower limb biomechanics during gait.

Authors:  Sam Khamis; Eli Carmeli
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Risk factors for limb overgrowth after the application of titanium elastic nailing in the treatment of pediatric femoral fracture.

Authors:  Cheng-Qian Dai; Jie Yang; Xiao-Shan Guo; Liao-Jun Sun
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Displaced Tibial Shaft Fractures With Intact Fibula in Children: Nonoperative Management Versus Operative Treatment With Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing.

Authors:  Federico Canavese; Alexei Botnari; Antonio Andreacchio; Lorenza Marengo; Antoine Samba; Alain Dimeglio; Bruno Pereira; Mounira Mansour; Marie Rousset
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2016 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Risk factors for overgrowth after flexible intramedullary nailing for fractures of the femoral shaft in children.

Authors:  S-S Park; H Noh; M Kam
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures.

Authors:  Nirav K Patel; Joanna Horstman; Victoria Kuester; Senthil Sambandam; Varatharaj Mounasamy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Elastic stable intramedullary nailing for severely displaced distal tibial fractures in children.

Authors:  Kaiying Shen; Haiqing Cai; Zhigang Wang; Yunlan Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  1 in total

1.  External fixation versus elastic stable intramedullary nailing in the treatment of open tibial shaft fractures in children.

Authors:  Pan Hong; Saroj Rai; Xin Tang; Ruikang Liu; Jin Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.359

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.