Literature DB >> 29306147

The effect of simulated leg length discrepancy on lower limb biomechanics during gait.

Sam Khamis1, Eli Carmeli2.   

Abstract

Understanding the effects of leg length discrepancy (LLD) on the biomechanics of gait and determining as to what extent of LLD alters gait is essential. A total of 91 biomechanical data were assessed from 14 lower limbs of healthy individuals walking under random conditions: shod only and with a 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 40 mm sole lift. Lower limb kinematics and dynamic leg length (DLL) were measured by a motion capture system. Hotelling's T-Square test was used to evaluate the differences in DLLs throughout the gait cycle in conjunction with differences between the sides based on the maximal stance phase and minimal swing phase DLLs. Kinematics were compared using the one-way blocked analysis of variance and Post-hoc analysis by the paired t-test. Significant dynamic shortening of the longer limb, mainly during the swing phase, and significant change in maximal stance and minimal swing phase DLL relationship started at a 10 mm lift condition (p < 0.05). Thirteen kinematic variables produced a significant angular main effect (p < 0.05), with a more flexed position of the longer limb and extended shorter limb beginning at a 5 mm lift. An increase in hip abduction and external foot rotation during the swing phase was also found. This study demonstrates that simulated LLD, as low as 5 mm, causes biomechanical changes in the lower limbs during gait revealed in both kinematics and dynamic leg length, suggesting that LLD, as small as 5-10 mm, should not be ignored.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic leg length; Gait; Leg length discrepancy; Lower limbs

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29306147     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  8 in total

1.  Leg length discrepancy, overgrowth, and associated risk factors after a pediatric tibial shaft fracture.

Authors:  Woo Young Choi; Moon Seok Park; Kyoung Min Lee; Kug Jin Choi; Hyon Soo Jung; Ki Hyuk Sung
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-15

2.  Measuring Dynamic Leg Length during Normal Gait.

Authors:  Sam Khamis; Shmuel Springer; Dror Ovadia; Sima Krimus; Eli Carmeli
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Late sequelae of osteoarticular infections in pediatric patients: A single-center study.

Authors:  Lydia Saad; Mathilde Hupin; Chantal Buteau; Marie-Lyne Nault
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Inertial measurement units for the detection of the effects of simulated leg length inequalities.

Authors:  Hannah Lena Siebers; Jörg Eschweiler; Valentin M Quack; Markus Tingart; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Orthotic Insoles Improve Gait Symmetry and Reduce Immediate Pain in Subjects With Mild Leg Length Discrepancy.

Authors:  Charlotte Menez; Maxime L'Hermette; Jeremy Coquart
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-12-16

6.  Leg Length Discrepancy and Nonspecific Low Back Pain: 3-D Stereophotogrammetric Quantitative Posture Evaluation Confirms Positive Effects of Customized Heel-Lift Orthotics.

Authors:  Moreno D'Amico; Edyta Kinel; Piero Roncoletta
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-10

7.  Comparison of Intramedullary Magnetic Nail, Monolateral External Distractor, and Spatial External Fixator in Femur Lengthening in Adolescents with Congenital Diseases.

Authors:  Szymon Pietrzak; Dariusz Grzelecki; Tomasz Parol; Jarosław Czubak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Leg-length discrepancy and associated risk factors after paediatric femur shaft fracture: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Tae Gyun Kim; Moon Seok Park; Sang Hyeong Lee; Kug Jin Choi; Byeong-Eun Im; Dae Yeung Kim; Ki Hyuk Sung
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.