Literature DB >> 33720787

Parent Perspectives after the PRISM-P Randomized Trial: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Abby R Rosenberg1,2,3, Chuan Zhou4,5, Miranda C Bradford5, Krysta Barton1,5, Courtney C Junkins1, Mallory Taylor1,2,3, Erin K Kross3,6, J Randall Curtis3,6, J Nicholas Dionne-Odom7, Joyce P Yi-Frazier1.   

Abstract

Background: Parents experience high distress following their child's diagnosis of cancer. We previously tested two delivery models (group and one-on-one) of the "Promoting Resilience in Stress Management for Parents" (PRISM-P) intervention in a randomized trial: one-on-one delivery improved resilience and benefit finding at three months when compared to usual care (UC). Objective: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate quantitative and qualitative outcomes at six months. Design: In this single-center, phase 2, parallel, 1:1:1 randomized trial conducted December 2016 to December 2018, English-speaking parents with a 2-24 year-old child diagnosed with new cancer were randomly assigned to UC, one-on-one, or group PRISM-P, a brief, skill-based curriculum targeting stress management, goal setting, cognitive reframing, and meaning making. We collected parent-reported outcomes (resilience, benefit finding, and psychological distress) at baseline and three and six months. We applied linear mixed-effects regression models to examine six-month outcomes among all participants and conducted directed content analyses of exit interviews with the first 12 parents to complete each study arm.
Results: The 94 participating parents were median aged 35-38 years and predominantly white, college-educated mothers. At six months, there was no statistically significant difference in parent-reported outcomes. Exit interviews (n = 36) suggested that PRISM-P was highly valued: 100% of interviewed recipients recommended it for other parents. Most suggested more coaching would help them retain skills, and almost all endorsed a combined one-on-one and group program. Conclusions: Although the PRISM-P benefits observed at three months were not sustained for six months, all interviewed parents found it valuable. Additional opportunities to strengthen and sustain resilience resources include longer follow-up, flexible format, and skill reinforcement. Trial Registration: NCT02998086.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregivers; palliative care; parents; psychosocial outcomes; randomized trial; resilience

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33720787      PMCID: PMC9206468          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  27 in total

1.  Five years later: a cross-sectional comparison of breast cancer survivors with healthy women.

Authors:  Patriciav L Tomich; Vicki S Helgeson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.

Authors:  M G Kenward; J H Roger
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Commentary: Resilience Defined: An Alternative Perspective.

Authors:  Abby R Rosenberg; Joyce P Yi-Frazier
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2016-03-24

5.  Hope, distress, and later quality of life among adolescent and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  Abby R Rosenberg; Miranda C Bradford; Kira Bona; Michele L Shaffer; Joanne Wolfe; K Scott Baker; Nancy Lau; Joyce Yi-Frazier
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2017-11-03

6.  Specificity of problem-solving skills training in mothers of children newly diagnosed with cancer: results of a multisite randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Olle Jane Z Sahler; Michael J Dolgin; Sean Phipps; Diane L Fairclough; Martha A Askins; Ernest R Katz; Robert B Noll; Robert W Butler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Report from a multi-institutional randomized clinical trial examining computer-assisted problem-solving skills training for English- and Spanish-speaking mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer.

Authors:  Martha A Askins; Olle Jane Z Sahler; Sandra A Sherman; Diane L Fairclough; Robert W Butler; Ernest R Katz; Michael J Dolgin; James W Varni; Robert B Noll; Sean Phipps
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-12-17

Review 8.  In the eyes of the beholder: family and maternal influences on perceptions of adjustment of children with a chronic illness.

Authors:  E C Perrin; C C Ayoub; J B Willett
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.225

Review 9.  Psychosocial Assessment as a Standard of Care in Pediatric Cancer.

Authors:  Anne E Kazak; Annah N Abrams; Jaime Banks; Jennifer Christofferson; Stephen DiDonato; Martha A Grootenhuis; Marianne Kabour; Avi Madan-Swain; Sunita K Patel; Sima Zadeh; Mary Jo Kupst
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 10.  Cancer across the ages: a narrative review of caregiver burden for patients of all ages.

Authors:  Courtney C Junkins; Erin Kent; Kristin Litzelman; Margaret Bevans; Rachel S Cannady; Abby R Rosenberg
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2020-08-12
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  From Theory to Patient Care: A Model for the Development, Adaptation, and Testing of Psychosocial Interventions for Patients With Serious Illness.

Authors:  Abby R Rosenberg; Jill Steiner; Nancy Lau; Kaitlyn Fladeboe; Demet Toprak; Sabrina Gmuca; Maeve B O'Donnell; Kiska Smith; Crystal E Brown; Joyce P Yi-Frazier
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.