Literature DB >> 33718868

Wearable Technology May Assist in Retraining Foot Strike Patterns in Previously Injured Military Service Members: A Prospective Case Series.

Donald L Goss1, Daniel J Watson2, Erin M Miller3, Amy N Weart4, Eliza B Szymanek5, Gregory M Freisinger6.   

Abstract

A rearfoot strike (RFS) pattern with increased average vertical loading rates (AVLR) while running has been associated with injury. This study evaluated the ability of an instrumented sock, which provides real-time foot strike and cadence audio biofeedback, to transition previously injured military service members from a RFS to a non-rearfoot strike (NRFS) running pattern. Nineteen RFS runners (10 males, 9 females) were instructed to wear the instrumented socks to facilitate a change in foot strike while completing an independent walk-to-run progression and lower extremity exercise program. Kinetic data were collected during treadmill running while foot strike was determined using video analysis at initial (T1), post-intervention (T2), and follow-up (T3) data collections. Nearly all runners (18/19) transitioned to a NRFS pattern following intervention (8 ± 2.4 weeks after the initial visit). Most participants (16/18) maintained the transition at follow-up (5 ± 0.8 weeks after the post-intervention visit). AVLR of the involved and uninvolved limb decreased 29% from initial [54.7 ± 13.2 bodyweights per sec (BW/s) and 55.1 ± 12.7 BW/s] to post-intervention (38.7 ± 10.1 BW/s and 38.9 ± 10.0 BW/s), respectively. This effect persisted 5-weeks later at follow-up, representing an overall 30% reduction on the involved limb and 24% reduction on the uninvolved limb. Cadence increased from the initial to the post-intervention time-point (p = 0.045); however, this effect did not persist at follow-up (p = 0.08). With technology provided feedback from instrumented socks, approximately 90% of participants transitioned to a NRFS pattern, decreased AVLR, reduced stance time and maintained these running adaptations 5-weeks later.
Copyright © 2021 Goss, Watson, Miller, Weart, Szymanek and Freisinger.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cadence; foot strike; gait-retraining; loading rate; running biomechanics; wearable technology

Year:  2021        PMID: 33718868      PMCID: PMC7952986          DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.630937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Sports Act Living        ISSN: 2624-9367


  52 in total

1.  A comparison of negative joint work and vertical ground reaction force loading rates in Chi runners and rearfoot-striking runners.

Authors:  Donald Lee Goss; Michael T Gross
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  In-field gait retraining and mobile monitoring to address running biomechanics associated with tibial stress fracture.

Authors:  R W Willy; L Buchenic; K Rogacki; J Ackerman; A Schmidt; J D Willson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Video-based assessment of foot strike pattern and step rate is valid and reliable in runners with patellofemoral pain.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Esculier; Thomas Silvini; Laurent J Bouyer; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Weak associations between hip adduction angle and hip abductor muscle activity during running.

Authors:  Eric Foch; Richard A Brindle; Clare E Milner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Foot arch deformation and plantar fascia loading during running with rearfoot strike and forefoot strike: A dynamic finite element analysis.

Authors:  Tony Lin-Wei Chen; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Yan Wang; Jin Lin; Ming Zhang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Relationships of hip abductor strength, neuromuscular control, and hip width to femoral length ratio with peak hip adduction angle in healthy female runners.

Authors:  Richard A Brindle; D David Ebaugh; John D Willson; Margaret A Finley; Patricia A Shewokis; Clare E Milner
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running.

Authors:  Bryan C Heiderscheit; Elizabeth S Chumanov; Max P Michalski; Christa M Wille; Michael B Ryan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The effects of midfoot strike gait retraining on impact loading and joint stiffness.

Authors:  Zoe Y S Chan; Janet H Zhang; Reed Ferber; Gary Shum; Roy T H Cheung
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes.

Authors:  Donald L Goss; Michael Lewek; Bing Yu; William B Ware; Deydre S Teyhen; Michael T Gross
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Transition to forefoot strike reduces load rates more effectively than altered cadence.

Authors:  Erin E Futrell; K Douglas Gross; Darcy Reisman; David R Mullineaux; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 7.179

View more
  1 in total

1.  Vertical Loading Rate Is Not Associated with Running Injury, Regardless of Calculation Method.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schmida; Christa M Wille; Mikel R Stiffler-Joachim; Stephanie A Kliethermes; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-03-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.