| Literature DB >> 33718499 |
Xuesong Dai1,2, Jinghua Fang1,2, Siheng Wang1,2, Jianyang Luo3, Yan Xiong1,2, Miaofeng Zhang1,2, Sunan Zhu1,2, Xinning Yu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) has been proven to provide favorable short-term results for chondral defects in knees. However, it remains unclear whether the clinical benefits of MACI persist in the longer term.Entities:
Keywords: articular cartilage; biologic healing enhancement; biology of cartilage; clinical assessment/grading scales; knee; matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33718499 PMCID: PMC7925944 DOI: 10.1177/2325967120982139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.The second step of matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). (A) Exposed defect. (B) MACI implant secured using fibrin glue and No. 5-0 absorbable sutures.
Patient Characteristics
| Variable | Mean (Range) or No. |
|---|---|
| Descriptive data | |
| Age, y | 26.0 (12-48) |
| Body mass index | 22.2 (16-30) |
| Sex, male/female | 24/6 |
| Occupation | |
| Student | 15 |
| Worker | 14 |
| Athlete | 2 |
| Baseline characteristics | |
| Injured knee, left/right | 15/16 |
| Injury location, medial femoral condyle/lateral femoral condyle/trochlea | 14/16/1 |
| Defect size, cm2 | 4.8 (2.0-20.0) |
| Previous surgical procedures | 3 |
| Concomitant surgery | |
| Subchondral bone grafting | 2 |
| Partial meniscectomy | 4 |
| Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction | 1 |
Clinical Scores From Baseline to 5 Years After Surgery
| Outcome Measure, Mean (Range) | ||
|---|---|---|
| IKDC | Lysholm | |
| Time point | ||
| Preoperative | 58.6 (40.2-80.5) | 67.3 (46-95) |
| 1 mo | 32.2 (10.3-58.6) | 40.4 (15-72) |
| 3 mo | 49.1 (20.7-78.2) | 66.8 (30-100) |
| 6 mo | 66.5 (32.2-88.5) | 79.1 (27-100) |
| 12 mo | 79.1 (39.1-94.3) | 90.6 (71-100) |
| 2 y | 84.9 (60.9-100) | 92.7 (73-100) |
| 3 y | 86.4 (70.1-100) | 95.1 (85-100) |
| 4 y | 87.7 (83.9-100) | 95.8 (85-100) |
| 5 y | 88.4 (83.9-100) | 95.9 (85-100) |
|
| ||
| Friedman test | .001 | .001 |
| Wilcoxon signed rank test | ||
| 0-1 y | .002 | .001 |
| 0-2 y | .001 | <.001 |
| 0-3 y | <.001 | <.001 |
| 0-4 y | <.001 | <.001 |
| 0-5 y | .001 | .001 |
The Friedman nonparametric test was used to analyze the differences among all 9 time points. If significant differences were detected (P < .05), the Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired samples was used for comparison between the results of the 2 time points, with P < .006 (Bonferroni adjustment) regarded as significant. IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee.
Figure 2.Spearman rho for relationship between patient age and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (r S = –0.138; P = .492) and between patient age and Lysholm score (r S = –0.133; P = .508).
Figure 3.Magnetic resonance imaging scans with T2 mapping of the knee joint: (A) 3 months postoperatively and (B) 12 months postoperatively.
Figure 4.Magnetic resonance imaging with T2 value at all 9 time points. The paired Student t test was used to compare the T2 values of the transplanted area and normal area preoperatively (P = .004) as well as at postoperative 3 months (P = .006), 6 months (P = .001), 12 months (P = .262), 2 years (P = .180), 3 years (P = .160), 4 years (P = .772), and 5 years (P = .403). Significant differences were present at the preoperative, 3-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative time points. *P < .05.
Figure 5.The implantation procedure of a patient during his second surgery.
Figure 6.Intraoperative macroscopic observation during a patient’s second-look surgery.