Literature DB >> 36197459

Correlation between the quality of cartilage repair tissue and patellofemoral osteoarthritis after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation at three-year follow-up: a cross-sectional study.

Jialing Lyu1, Hongli Geng2, Weimin Zhu3, Dingfu Li1, Kang Chen3, Hui Ye4, Jun Xia5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the quality of cartilage repair tissue is associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) at a three year follow-up after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI).
METHODS: This retrospective study included 32 patients who underwent MACI between October 2014 and May 2018 at our institute. The Lysholm score and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score were assessed. The magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) 2.0 score and T2* relaxation time of repair tissue were used to evaluate cartilage repair tissue quality. A modified MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (mMOAKS) was used to evaluate PFOA.
RESULTS: Compared with pre-operative scores, the final Lysholm score (50.71 ± 2.22 vs 89.70 ± 1.18; t = 15.5, P < 0.0001) and VAS score (4.67 ± 0.47 vs 0.92 ± 0.64; t = 22.62, P < 0.0001) were improved at 3 years after MACI. At the three year follow-up, the mean MOCART 2.0 score was 61.56 ± 18.11, and the T2* relaxation time of the repair tissue was significantly lower than that in the healthy control region (24.11 ± 6.38 vs 34.39 ± 1.33, t =  - 8.635, P < 0.0001). The mean mMOAKS score was 9.16 ± 4.51. On univariate analysis, the MOCART 2.0 score and T2* relaxation time were negatively associated with the mMOAKS score.
CONCLUSION: MACI can lead to significant pain relief and restoration of knee joint function, and good quality cartilage repair tissue was a protective factor against PFOA at the three year follow-up.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage repair tissue; MACI; MRI; Osteoarthritis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36197459     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05581-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  20 in total

1.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation in knee joint: MR imaging and histologic features at 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Bernhard J Tins; Iain W McCall; Tomoki Takahashi; Victor Cassar-Pullicino; Sally Roberts; Brian Ashton; James Richardson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A Prospective Clinical and Radiological Evaluation at 5 Years After Arthroscopic Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Michael Fallon; David J Wood; Gregory C Janes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  How to Manage Cartilage Injuries?

Authors:  Jorge Chahla; Jonathan Stone; Bert R Mandelbaum
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Comparative Effectiveness of Cartilage Repair With Respect to the Minimal Clinically Important Difference.

Authors:  Kristofer J Jones; Benjamin V Kelley; Armin Arshi; David R McAllister; Peter D Fabricant
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Cartilage repair surgery prevents progression of knee degeneration.

Authors:  Pia M Jungmann; Alexandra S Gersing; Frederic Baumann; Christian Holwein; Sepp Braun; Jan Neumann; Julia Zarnowski; Felix C Hofmann; Andreas B Imhoff; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Long-term T2 and Qualitative MRI Morphology After First-Generation Knee Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: Cartilage Ultrastructure Is Not Correlated to Clinical or Qualitative MRI Outcome.

Authors:  Gian M Salzmann; Benjamin Erdle; Stella Porichis; Markus Uhl; Nadir Ghanem; Hagen Schmal; David Kubosch; Norbert P Südkamp; Philipp Niemeyer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 7.  MR imaging of cartilage and its repair in the knee--a review.

Authors:  S Trattnig; S Domayer; G W Welsch; T Mosher; F Eckstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Can we have an overall osteoarthritis severity score for the patellofemoral joint using magnetic resonance imaging? Reliability and validity.

Authors:  Sarah Kobayashi; Anthony Peduto; Milena Simic; Marlene Fransen; Kathryn Refshauge; Jean Mah; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Reliability of the MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) 2.0 knee score for different cartilage repair techniques-a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Markus M Schreiner; Marcus Raudner; Sebastian Röhrich; Martin Zalaudek; Michael Weber; Georg Kaiser; Silke Aldrian; Catharina Chiari; Reinhard Windhager; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Clinical evaluation after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation : a comparison of four different graft types.

Authors:  Harald Binder; Lukas Hoffman; Lukas Zak; Thomas Tiefenboeck; Silke Aldrian; Christian Albrecht
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.