Literature DB >> 21683232

A comparison of the cleft lift procedure vs wide excision and packing for the treatment of pilonidal disease in adolescents.

Amir S Gendy1, Richard D Glick, Andrew R Hong, Stephen E Dolgin, Samuel Z Soffer, Helen Landers, Michelle Herrforth, Nelson G Rosen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: The cleft lift for pilonidal disease is a flap procedure designed to counteract suspected causes of closed-technique failure. This study compares cleft lift with wide excision and packing in adolescents with respect to complications, healing, and recurrence.
METHODS: Charts of all patients surgically treated for pilonidal disease at our institution from August 2000 to August 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. Wide excision was routinely performed until May 2007 when the cleft lift as described by Bascom was instituted here. Factors examined were postoperative complications, wound healing, and disease recurrence.
RESULTS: Seventy patients (49 males, 21 females; mean age, 16 years; mean weight, 170.5 lb) with pilonidal disease underwent a total of 39 cleft lift procedures and 34 wide excision procedures. All but 1 cleft lift patient (97.4%) healed completely, whereas 25 (73.5%) of 34 patients in the excision group healed (P < .001). The remaining 9 excision patients had chronic wounds, 3 of whom have undergone cleft lift with full healing. One cleft lift patient had recurrent disease (2.5%) compared with 7 (20.6%) of 34 excision patients (P < .02).
CONCLUSIONS: The cleft lift procedure is a superior treatment method of pilonidal disease in adolescents, resulting in primary healing, lower likelihood of recurrent disease, and simplified wound care.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21683232     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  9 in total

1.  Is the cleft lift procedure for non-acute sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease a definitive treatment? Long-term outcomes in 74 patients.

Authors:  P M Ortega; J Baixauli; J Arredondo; M Bellver; C Sánchez-Justicia; S Ocaña; J L Hernández-Lizoain
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  I Iesalnieks; A Ommer; S Petersen; D Doll; A Herold
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  The Management of Pilonidal Sinus.

Authors:  Igors Iesalnieks; Andreas Ommer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

Authors:  V K Stauffer; M M Luedi; P Kauf; M Schmid; M Diekmann; K Wieferich; B Schnüriger; D Doll
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.

Authors:  Dietrich Doll; Andriu Orlik; Katharina Maier; Peter Kauf; Marco Schmid; Maja Diekmann; Andreas P Vogt; Verena K Stauffer; Markus M Luedi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Analysis of Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults With Pilonidal Disease.

Authors:  Mackenzie N Abraham; Steven L Raymond; Russell B Hawkins; Atif Iqbal; Shawn D Larson; Moiz M Mustafa; Janice A Taylor; Saleem Islam
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-02-25

Review 7.  German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020.

Authors:  I Iesalnieks; A Ommer; A Herold; D Doll
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Comparative Study of Limberg Flap Reconstruction With Wide-Open Excision and Healing by Secondary Intention in the Management of Pilonidal Sinus: Our Experience at a Tertiary Care Center in India.

Authors:  Swapnil P Chopade; Geet R Adhikari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-28

9.  Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  R Perinotti; G Gallo; M Milone; L Basso; M Manigrasso; R Pietroletti; A Bondurri; M La Torre; G Milito; M Pozzo; D Segre
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.781

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.