Literature DB >> 33718414

Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and Photopic Negative Response of Focal Macular Electroretinograms in the Evaluation of the Relationship Between Macula Structure and Function.

Kazuyuki Hirooka1, Kenji Yokoyama1, Kana Tokumo1, Yoshiaki Kiuchi1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the association between macular inner retinal layer thickness and macula visual field (VF) mean deviation as measured by the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) or macular function as measured by focal macular electroretinograms (ERGs) in patients with glaucoma.
Methods: The participants in this cross-sectional study were 71 patients with glaucoma and 10 healthy controls. Macular inner retinal layer thickness and function were measured in all participants using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and HFA or focal macular ERGs, respectively. Macular OCT images were segmented into the macular retinal nerve fiber layer (mRNFL), macular ganglion cell layer/inner plexiform layer (GCL/IPL), and ganglion cell complex (GCC). Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship between macular inner retinal layer thickness and function.
Results: Focal macular ERGs were composed of a negative wave (N1), a positive wave (P1), and a slow negative wave (N2). The N2 response density was significantly reduced in eyes with glaucoma, and was significantly associated with the thickness of the mRNFL (R = 0.317), GCL/IPL (R = 0.372), or GCC (R = 0.367). The observed structure-function relationship was also significantly correlated with the HFA VF mean deviation for each thickness [mRNFL (R = 0.728), GCL/IPL (R = 0.603), or GCC (R = 0.754)]. Conclusions: Although a significant correlation was found between the N2 response density and the thickness of the macular inner layer, the observed structure-function relationship with the mean deviation of the HFA VF was higher than that of the N2 response density.
Copyright © 2021 Hirooka, Yokoyama, Tokumo and Kiuchi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electroretinogram (ERG); glaucoma; optical coherance tomography; structure-function; visual field

Year:  2021        PMID: 33718414      PMCID: PMC7952991          DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.649971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)        ISSN: 2296-858X


  21 in total

1.  Retinal ganglion cell density and cortical magnification factor in the primate.

Authors:  H Wässle; U Grünert; J Röhrenbeck; B B Boycott
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Focal relationship between structure and function within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma.

Authors:  Shinji Ohkubo; Tomomi Higashide; Sachiko Udagawa; Kazuhisa Sugiyama; Masanori Hangai; Nagahisa Yoshimura; Chihiro Mayama; Atsuo Tomidokoro; Makoto Araie; Aiko Iwase; Takashi Fujimura
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Alterations of photopic negative response of multifocal electroretinogram in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Muneyoshi Kaneko; Shigeki Machida; Yuya Hoshi; Daijiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.424

4.  Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma.

Authors:  H A Quigley; G R Dunkelberger; W R Green
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.

Authors:  Laura Wilsey; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Grant Cull; Christy Hardin; Claude F Burgoyne; Brad Fortune
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Characterization of retinal damage in the episcleral vein cauterization rat glaucoma model.

Authors:  John Danias; Fran Shen; Manolis Kavalarakis; Bin Chen; David Goldblum; Kevin Lee; Maria-Florencia Zamora; YanLing Su; Scott E Brodie; Steven M Podos; Thom Mittag
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Sensitivity and specificity of photopic negative response of focal electoretinogram to detect glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  S Machida; K Tamada; T Oikawa; D Yokoyama; M Kaneko; D Kurosaka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Ganglion cell contributions to the rat full-field electroretinogram.

Authors:  Bang V Bui; Brad Fortune
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Modeling the relative influence of fixation and sampling errors on retest variability in perimetry.

Authors:  T Maddess
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.