Tim Hundscheid1, Esther J S Jansen1, Wes Onland2, Elisabeth M W Kooi3, Peter Andriessen4,5, Willem P de Boode1. 1. Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 2. Department of Neonatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 3. Division of Neonatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. 4. Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Center Veldhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands. 5. Department of Applied Physics, School of Medical Physics and Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate outcome after conservative management (no pharmacological/surgical intervention other than fluid restriction, diuretics, or ventilator adjustments) compared with active (pharmacological and/or surgical) treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants and analyze differences in outcome between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Study Design: This is a systematic literature review using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. RCTs and cohort studies comparing conservative management with active treatment were included. Meta-analysis was used to compare conservative management with any active (pharmacological and/or surgical), any pharmacological (non-prophylactic and prophylactic), and/or surgical treatment for mortality as primary and major neonatal morbidity as secondary outcome measure. Fixed-effect analysis was used, unless heterogeneity (I 2) was >50%. Outcome is presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval. Results: Twelve cohort studies and four RCTs were included, encompassing 41,804 and 720 patients, respectively. In cohort studies, conservative management for PDA was associated with a significantly higher risk for mortality (RR, 1.34 [1.12-1.62]) but a significantly lower risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR, 0.55 [0.46-0.65]), necrotizing enterocolitis (RR, 0.85 [0.77-0.93]), intraventricular hemorrhage (RR, 0.88 [0.83-0.95]), and retinopathy of prematurity (RR, 0.47 [0.28-0.79]) compared with any active PDA treatment. Meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed no significant differences in outcome between conservative management and active treatment. Conclusion: No differences in mortality or morbidity for conservative management compared with active treatment regimens were observed in RCTs. Findings from cohort studies mainly highlight the lack of high-quality evidence for conservative management for PDA in preterm infants.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate outcome after conservative management (no pharmacological/surgical intervention other than fluid restriction, diuretics, or ventilator adjustments) compared with active (pharmacological and/or surgical) treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants and analyze differences in outcome between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Study Design: This is a systematic literature review using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. RCTs and cohort studies comparing conservative management with active treatment were included. Meta-analysis was used to compare conservative management with any active (pharmacological and/or surgical), any pharmacological (non-prophylactic and prophylactic), and/or surgical treatment for mortality as primary and major neonatal morbidity as secondary outcome measure. Fixed-effect analysis was used, unless heterogeneity (I 2) was >50%. Outcome is presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval. Results: Twelve cohort studies and four RCTs were included, encompassing 41,804 and 720 patients, respectively. In cohort studies, conservative management for PDA was associated with a significantly higher risk for mortality (RR, 1.34 [1.12-1.62]) but a significantly lower risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR, 0.55 [0.46-0.65]), necrotizing enterocolitis (RR, 0.85 [0.77-0.93]), intraventricular hemorrhage (RR, 0.88 [0.83-0.95]), and retinopathy of prematurity (RR, 0.47 [0.28-0.79]) compared with any active PDA treatment. Meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed no significant differences in outcome between conservative management and active treatment. Conclusion: No differences in mortality or morbidity for conservative management compared with active treatment regimens were observed in RCTs. Findings from cohort studies mainly highlight the lack of high-quality evidence for conservative management for PDA in preterm infants.
Authors: P Arun Kumar Nair; Mangalore Govind Pai; Hesham Abdel Rahim Gazal; David Eustace Da Costa; Saleh Mohammed Al Khusaiby Journal: Indian Pediatr Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 1.411
Authors: Pia Härkin; Antti Härmä; Outi Aikio; Marita Valkama; Markku Leskinen; Timo Saarela; Mikko Hallman Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: David van Laere; Bart van Overmeire; Samir Gupta; Afif El-Khuffash; Marilena Savoia; Patrick J McNamara; Christoph E Schwarz; Willem P de Boode Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.756