| Literature DB >> 33718084 |
Haozhen Li1, Quan Zhu1, Kaixuan Li1, Ziqiang Wu1, Zhengyan Tang1,2, Zhao Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ketamine abuse has been linked to the system's damage, presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). While the pathogenesis of ketamine-induced urinary damage is not fully understood, fibrosis is believed to be a potential mechanism. A metabolomic investigation of the urinary metabolites in ketamine abuse was conducted to gain insights into its pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Ketamine; bladder fibrosis; metabolomics
Year: 2021 PMID: 33718084 PMCID: PMC7947432 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-1202
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Androl Urol ISSN: 2223-4683
Figure 1Histopathological changes of bladder specimen induced by 8-week ketamine injection in rat. Comparison between the control group (A) and ketamine group (B) through HE staining showed urothelium desquamation (red arrow), inflammatory cell infiltration (blue arrow), vascular distension and congestion (yellow arrow) in ketamine group. Bladder fibrosis was confirmed via Masson trichrome staining in control (C) and ketamine group (D). It showed collagen deposition (green arrow). Original magnification ×100.
Figure 2Score scatter plot of OPLS-DA model for ketamine group vs. control group (A for negative ion and B for positive ion mode) and permutation test of OPLS-DA model for ketamine group vs. control group (C for negative ion and D for positive ion mode). OPLS-DA, orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis.
Figure 3Comparison of all differentially expressed metabolites levels in the ketamine and control groups. Heatmaps showed 118 significantly altered metabolites between these two groups (A). The colors correspond to the abundance value of each metabolite. Volcano map showed differentially expressed metabolites screened by VIP value >1 and P<0.05 (B). VIP, variable importance in the projection.
Partial results of differential metabolites in ketamine treated rat urine samples compared to control group
| Metabolites | VIP | Fold change |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroxyphenyllactic acid | 2.63 | 17.03 |
| Epsilon-caprolactone | 2.48 | 9.59 |
| Allocystathionine | 2.17 | 7.02 |
| (+)-Methamphetamine | 2.35 | 6.95 |
| Dimethylformamide | 1.94 | 4.21 |
| Myristoleic acid | 2.10 | 1.73 |
| L-homoserine | 1.75 | 1.55 |
| Estrone-3-glucuronide | 2.10 | 0.49 |
| 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid | 1.79 | 0.46 |
| N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid | 2.40 | 0.44 |
| Tyr-Glu | 2.12 | 0.43 |
| anthranilic acid (vitamin L1) | 1.85 | 0.36 |
VIP, variable importance in the projection.
Figure 4ROC curves (A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J) and box plots (K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R) for differential metabolites screened with AUC >0.9. (A,J) Methamphetamine; (B,K) 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; (C,L) 7-methylguanosine; (D,M) allocystathionine; (E,N) clofibrate; (F,O) epsilon-caprolactone; (G,P) myristoleic acid; (H,Q) N-acetyl-L-aspartic acid; (I,R) Tyr-Glu. AUC, area under the curve of ROC.
Figure 5Heatmap of correlation analysis for differential metabolites (A). Pathway analysis bubble plot for model group vs. control group (B for negative ion and C for positive ion mode). Regulatory network map for model group vs. control group (D for negative ion and E for positive ion mode).
Partial enriched pathway of differential metabolites
| Pathway ID in KEGG database | Description of pathway | Compounds number |
|---|---|---|
| rno01100 | Metabolic pathways | 46 |
| rno00240 | Pyrimidine metabolism | 8 |
| rno00520 | Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | 6 |
| rno01230 | Biosynthesis of amino acids | 5 |
| rno00400 | Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis | 4 |