Literature DB >> 33717982

Wearable robotic exoskeleton for gait reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury: A literature review.

Koki Tan1, Soichiro Koyama2, Hiroaki Sakurai2, Toshio Teranishi2, Yoshikiyo Kanada2, Shigeo Tanabe2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Wearable robotic exoskeletons (WREs) have been globally developed to achieve gait reconstruction in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The present study aimed to enable evidence-based decision-making in selecting the optimal WRE according to residual motor function and to provide a new perspective on further development of appropriate WREs.
METHODS: The current review was conducted by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant studies published from April 2015 to February 2020. Selected studies were analysed with a focus on the participants' neurological level of SCI, amount of training (number of training sessions and duration of the total training period), gait speed and endurance achieved, and subgroup exploration of the number of persons for assistance and the walking aid used among patients with cervical level injury.
RESULTS: A total of 28 articles (nine using Ekso, three using Indego, ten using ReWalk, one using REX, five using Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor) involving 228 patients were included in the analysis. Across all WREs, T6 was the most frequently reported level of SCI. The amount of training showed a wide distribution (number of training sessions: 2-230 sessions [30-120 min per session]; duration of the total training period: 1-24 weeks [1-5 times per week]). The mean gait speed was 0.31 m/s (standard deviation [SD] 0.14), and the mean distance on the 6-min walking test as a measure of endurance was 108.9 m (SD 46.7). The subgroup exploration aimed at patients with cervical level injury indicated that 59.2% of patients were able to ambulate with no physical assistance and several patients used a walker as a walking aid.
CONCLUSION: The number of cervical level injury increased, as compared to the number previously indicated by a prior similar review. Training procedure was largely different among studies. Further improvement based on gait performance is required for use and dissemination in daily life. THE TRANSLATIONAL POTENTIAL OF THIS ARTICLE: The present review reveals the current state of the clinical effectiveness of WREs for gait reconstruction in patients with SCI, contributing to evidence-based device application and further development.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait reconstruction; Paraplegia; Tetraplegia; Wearable robotic exoskeleton

Year:  2021        PMID: 33717982      PMCID: PMC7930505          DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2021.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Translat        ISSN: 2214-031X            Impact factor:   5.191


  61 in total

Review 1.  Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seyed Behzad Jazayeri; Sara Beygi; Farhad Shokraneh; Ellen Merete Hagen; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Clinician-Focused Overview of Bionic Exoskeleton Use After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Anne E Palermo; Jennifer L Maher; Carsten Bach Baunsgaard; Mark S Nash
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017

3.  Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia.

Authors:  Pierre Asselin; Steven Knezevic; Stephen Kornfeld; Christopher Cirnigliaro; Irina Agranova-Breyter; William A Bauman; Ann M Spungen
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2015

4.  A nationwide epidemiological survey of spinal cord injuries in Japan from January 1990 to December 1992.

Authors:  H Shingu; M Ohama; T Ikata; S Katoh; T Akatsu
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1995-04

5.  Exoskeleton Training May Improve Level of Physical Activity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Rodney Wade; Ryan Sumrell; Lynette Villadelgado; Refka E Khalil; Timothy Lavis
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-04

6.  Walking with a powered robotic exoskeleton: Subjective experience, spasticity and pain in spinal cord injured persons.

Authors:  Giulia Stampacchia; Alessandro Rustici; Samuele Bigazzi; Adriana Gerini; Tullia Tombini; Stefano Mazzoleni
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.138

7.  Feasibility of robotic exoskeleton ambulation in a C4 person with incomplete spinal cord injury: a case report.

Authors:  Robert M Lester; Ashraf S Gorgey
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2018-04-27

8.  Evidence-based evaluation of physiological effects of standing and walking in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Karimi
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2011-12

Review 9.  Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Larry E Miller; Angela K Zimmermann; William G Herbert
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-03-22

10.  Overground walking with a robotic exoskeleton elicits trunk muscle activity in people with high-thoracic motor-complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raed A Alamro; Amanda E Chisholm; Alison M M Williams; Mark G Carpenter; Tania Lam
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rehabilitation Program for Gait Training Using UAN.GO, a Powered Exoskeleton: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gianfranco Lamberti; Gianluca Sesenna; Qamil Paja; Gianluca Ciardi
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  The improvement of the lower limb exoskeletons on the gait of patients with spinal cord injury: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiali Xue; Xinwei Yang; Huan Tu; Wanna Liu; Dezhi Kong; Zhonghe Fan; Zhongyi Deng; Ning Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Wearable Power-Assist Locomotor for Gait Reconstruction in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Soichiro Koyama; Shigeo Tanabe; Takeshi Gotoh; Yuta Taguchi; Masaki Katoh; Eiichi Saitoh; Yohei Otaka; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Comparison of Efficacy of Lokomat and Wearable Exoskeleton-Assisted Gait Training in People With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lingjie Zhang; Fabin Lin; Lei Sun; Chunmei Chen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Using Artificial Neuro-Molecular System in Robotic Arm Motion Control-Taking Simulation of Rehabilitation as an Example.

Authors:  Jong-Chen Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  An anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective biomimetic nanoplatform for repairing spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Zhihui Han; Cheng Huang; Huali Lei; Guangqiang Li; Lin Chen; Dandan Feng; Zijie Zhou; Qin Shi; Liang Cheng; Xiaozhong Zhou
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.