Literature DB >> 29426792

Twelve-Year Follow-Up of Navigated Computer-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial.

Johannes Cip1, Florian Obwegeser1, Thomas Benesch2, Christian Bach1, Paul Ruckenstuhl3, Arno Martin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Navigated computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was introduced to expedite long-term survival based on improved postoperative implantation accuracy. However, long-term outcome data after 10 years or more are rare, even available meta-analyses show controversial study results.
METHODS: In a prospective randomized trial, 100 conventional TKAs (group CONV) were compared with 100 computer-assisted TKAs (group NAV) after a mean follow-up of 12 years postoperatively. A long-leg weight-bearing X-ray was performed for measuring mechanical axis of the limb, lateral distal femoral angle, and medial proximal tibial angle. Tibial slope, patella alpha angle, and radiolucent lines were also observed. Clinical investigation included evaluation of 4 different scores: Insall Knee Score, Western Ontario and MacMaster University Index score, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score, and visual analog scale.
RESULTS: Based on a follow-up rate of at least 75%, no difference in TKA survival was found 12 years postoperatively: 91.5% in group CONV vs 98.2% in group NAV (P = .181). Since 5-year follow-up, no additional TKA revision had been performed in both groups. Group CONV showed a nonsignificant higher inaccuracy of neutral lower limb axis (1.8° ± 1.4°) compared to group NAV (1.6° ± 1.7°, P = .700). All X-ray assessments were not significant different within both study groups (P ≥ .068). Clinical examination showed no differences in evaluations (P ≥ .204). All collected outcome score results were similar (P ≥ .222).
CONCLUSION: Twelve years postoperatively, no differences were found in terms of long-term survival, implantation accuracy, clinical outcome or score results.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  12-year follow-up; TKA; comparison; computer-assisted; conventional; navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29426792     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

1.  Conventional versus computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: comparison at ten years follow-up.

Authors:  Michele d'Amato; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Paolo Barbadoro; Andrea Illuminati; Claudio Belvedere
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Prior unilateral total hip arthroplasty does not influence the outcome of ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alfredo Asensio-Pascual; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; M Flores Vizcaya-Moreno; Fancisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Assistive technologies in knee arthroplasty: fashion or evolution? Rate of publications and national registries prove the Scott Parabola wrong.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Sébastien Parratte
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.

Authors:  Andrew G Kim; Zachary Bernhard; Alexander J Acuña; Victoria S Wu; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.114

5.  Clinical outcomes in TKA are enhanced by both robotic assistance and patient specific alignment: a comparative trial in 120 patients.

Authors:  Philip Winnock de Grave; J Kellens; T Tampere; H Vermue; T Luyckx; K Claeys
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Robotic-arm assisted versus conventional technique for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective single centre study.

Authors:  Chenkai Li; Tao Li; Zian Zhang; Hui Huang; Chun Rong; Wanping Zhu; Haining Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 7.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Joe Clair; Nazanin Esmaili; Arshad Barmare; Siva Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-25

8.  No influence of obesity on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty using a gap balancing technique.

Authors:  Raj Kanna; Ananth Brasanna; Gautam M Shetty; Chandramohan Ravichandran
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-08

9.  Effects of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty on the levels of inflammation markers: A prospective study.

Authors:  Shu-Jui Kuo; Horng-Chaung Hsu; Ching-Jen Wang; Ka-Kit Siu; Ya-Hung Hsu; Jih-Yang Ko; Chih-Hsin Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How Large a Study Is Needed to Detect TKA Revision Rate Reductions Attributable to Robotic or Navigated Technologies? A Simulation-based Power Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew D Hickey; Carolyn Anglin; Bassam Masri; Antony J Hodgson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.