Literature DB >> 33717458

Construct social-behavioral association network to study management impact on waterbirds community ecology using digital video recording cameras.

Muhammad Awais Rasool1,2, Xiaobo Zhang1,2, Muhammad Azher Hassan3, Tanveer Hussain4, Cai Lu1,2, Qing Zeng1,2, Boyong Peng5, Li Wen1,2,6, Guangchun Lei1,2.   

Abstract

Studying social-behavior and species associations in ecological communities is challenging because it is difficult to observe the interactions in the field. Animal behavior is especially difficult to observe when selection of habitat and activities are linked to energy costs of long-distance movement. Migrating communities tend to be resource specific and prefer environments that offer more suitability for coexisting in a shared space and time. Given the recent advances in digital technologies, digital video recording systems are gaining popularity in wildlife research and management. We used digital video recording cameras to study social interactions and species-habitat linkages for wintering waterbirds communities in shared habitats. Examining over 8,640 hr of video footages, we built tetrapartite social-behavioral association network of wintering waterbirds over habitat (n = 5) selection events in sites with distinct management regimes. We analyzed these networks to identify hub species and species role in activity persistence, and to explore the effects of hydrological regime on these network characteristics. Although the differences in network attributes were not significant at treatment level (p = .297) in terms of network composition and keystone species composition, our results indicated that network attributes were significantly different (p = .000, r 2 = .278) at habitat level. There were evidences suggesting that the habitat quality was better at the managed sites, where the formed networks had more species, more network nodes and edges, higher edge density, and stronger intra- and inter-species interactions. In addition, we also calculated the species interaction preference scores (SIPS) and behavioral interaction preference scores (BIPS) of each network. The results showed that species synchronize activities in shared space for temporal niche partitioning in order to avoid or minimize any potential competition for shared space. Our social network analysis (SNA) approach is likely to provide a practical use for ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation.
© 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior interaction preferences; community ecology; species interaction preferences; video recording cameras; wintering habitat selection

Year:  2021        PMID: 33717458      PMCID: PMC7920787          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


  33 in total

1.  Patch use in time and space for a meso-predator in a risky world.

Authors:  Shomen Mukherjee; Michal Zelcer; Burt P Kotler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Network modularity reveals critical scales for connectivity in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Robert J Fletcher; Andre Revell; Brian E Reichert; Wiley M Kitchens; Jeremy D Dixon; James D Austin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  ECOLOGY. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet.

Authors:  Roland Kays; Margaret C Crofoot; Walter Jetz; Martin Wikelski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Animal Social Network Theory Can Help Wildlife Conservation.

Authors:  Lysanne Snijders; Daniel T Blumstein; Christina R Stanley; Daniel W Franks
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levine; Jordi Bascompte; Peter B Adler; Stefano Allesina
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Do animals have insight, and what is insight anyway?

Authors:  Sara J Shettleworth
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2012-12

7.  Assortment and the analysis of natural selection on social traits.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Damien R Farine; Kevin R Foster; Jay M Biernaskie
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network.

Authors:  Thomas W Pike; Madhumita Samanta; Jan Lindström; Nick J Royle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness.

Authors:  Santiago Soliveres; Fernando T Maestre; Werner Ulrich; Peter Manning; Steffen Boch; Matthew A Bowker; Daniel Prati; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; José L Quero; Ingo Schöning; Antonio Gallardo; Wolfgang Weisser; Jörg Müller; Stephanie A Socher; Miguel García-Gómez; Victoria Ochoa; Ernst-Detlef Schulze; Markus Fischer; Eric Allan
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Weighting and indirect effects identify keystone species in food webs.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Huayong Zhang; Eoin J O'Gorman; Wang Tian; Athen Ma; John C Moore; Stuart R Borrett; Guy Woodward
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 9.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.