Literature DB >> 33716814

Predicting Brain Age at Slice Level: Convolutional Neural Networks and Consequences for Interpretability.

Pedro L Ballester1, Laura Tomaz da Silva2, Matheus Marcon2,3, Nathalia Bianchini Esper3,4, Benicio N Frey5,6, Augusto Buchweitz3,5,7, Felipe Meneguzzi2.   

Abstract

Problem: Chronological aging in later life is associated with brain degeneration processes and increased risk for disease such as stroke and dementia. With a worldwide tendency of aging populations and increased longevity, mental health, and psychiatric research have paid increasing attention to understanding brain-related changes of aging. Recent findings suggest there is a brain age gap (a difference between chronological age and brain age predicted by brain imaging indices); the magnitude of the gap may indicate early onset of brain aging processes and disease. Artificial intelligence has allowed for a narrowing of the gap in chronological and predicted brain age. However, the factors that drive model predictions of brain age are still unknown, and there is not much about these factors that can be gleaned from the black-box nature of machine learning models. The goal of the present study was to test a brain age regression approach that is more amenable to interpretation by researchers and clinicians.
Methods: Using convolutional neural networks we trained multiple regressor models to predict brain age based on single slices of magnetic resonance imaging, which included gray matter- or white matter-segmented inputs. We evaluated the trained models in all brain image slices to generate a final prediction of brain age. Unlike whole-brain approaches to classification, the slice-level predictions allows for the identification of which brain slices and associated regions have the largest difference between chronological and neuroimaging-derived brain age. We also evaluated how model predictions were influenced by slice index and plane, participant age and sex, and MRI data collection site.
Results: The results show, first, that the specific slice used for prediction affects prediction error (i.e., difference between chronological age and neuroimaging-derived brain age); second, the MRI site-stratified separation of training and test sets removed site effects and also minimized sex effects; third, the choice of MRI slice plane influences the overall error of the model.
Conclusion: Compared to whole brain-based predictive models of neuroimaging-derived brain age, slice-based approach improves the interpretability and therefore the reliability of the prediction of brain age using MRI data.
Copyright © 2021 Ballester, da Silva, Marcon, Esper, Frey, Buchweitz and Meneguzzi.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain age; convolutional neural networks; deep learning; model interpretability; neuroimaging

Year:  2021        PMID: 33716814      PMCID: PMC7949912          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.598518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychiatry        ISSN: 1664-0640            Impact factor:   4.157


  24 in total

Review 1.  Structural MRI.

Authors:  Mike P Wattjes
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.878

2.  A voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains.

Authors:  C D Good; I S Johnsrude; J Ashburner; R N Henson; K J Friston; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker.

Authors:  James H Cole; Rudra P K Poudel; Dimosthenis Tsagkrasoulis; Matthan W A Caan; Claire Steves; Tim D Spector; Giovanni Montana
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Identification of autism spectrum disorder using deep learning and the ABIDE dataset.

Authors:  Anibal Sólon Heinsfeld; Alexandre Rosa Franco; R Cameron Craddock; Augusto Buchweitz; Felipe Meneguzzi
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.881

5.  Epigenetic analysis confirms no accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Joanne Voisey; Bruce R Lawford; C Phillip Morris; Leesa F Wockner; Ernest P Noble; Ross McD Young; Divya Mehta
Journal:  NPJ Schizophr       Date:  2017-09-04

6.  Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  John R Zech; Marcus A Badgeley; Manway Liu; Anthony B Costa; Joseph J Titano; Eric Karl Oermann
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Multimodality neuroimaging brain-age in UK biobank: relationship to biomedical, lifestyle, and cognitive factors.

Authors:  James H Cole
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Common brain disorders are associated with heritable patterns of apparent aging of the brain.

Authors:  Tobias Kaufmann; Dennis van der Meer; Nhat Trung Doan; Emanuel Schwarz; Martina J Lund; Ingrid Agartz; Dag Alnæs; Deanna M Barch; Ramona Baur-Streubel; Alessandro Bertolino; Francesco Bettella; Mona K Beyer; Erlend Bøen; Stefan Borgwardt; Christine L Brandt; Jan Buitelaar; Elisabeth G Celius; Simon Cervenka; Annette Conzelmann; Aldo Córdova-Palomera; Anders M Dale; Dominique J F de Quervain; Pasquale Di Carlo; Srdjan Djurovic; Erlend S Dørum; Sarah Eisenacher; Torbjørn Elvsåshagen; Thomas Espeseth; Helena Fatouros-Bergman; Lena Flyckt; Barbara Franke; Oleksandr Frei; Beathe Haatveit; Asta K Håberg; Hanne F Harbo; Catharina A Hartman; Dirk Heslenfeld; Pieter J Hoekstra; Einar A Høgestøl; Terry L Jernigan; Rune Jonassen; Erik G Jönsson; Peter Kirsch; Iwona Kłoszewska; Knut K Kolskår; Nils Inge Landrø; Stephanie Le Hellard; Klaus-Peter Lesch; Simon Lovestone; Arvid Lundervold; Astri J Lundervold; Luigi A Maglanoc; Ulrik F Malt; Patrizia Mecocci; Ingrid Melle; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Torgeir Moberget; Linn B Norbom; Jan Egil Nordvik; Lars Nyberg; Jaap Oosterlaan; Marco Papalino; Andreas Papassotiropoulos; Paul Pauli; Giulio Pergola; Karin Persson; Geneviève Richard; Jaroslav Rokicki; Anne-Marthe Sanders; Geir Selbæk; Alexey A Shadrin; Olav B Smeland; Hilkka Soininen; Piotr Sowa; Vidar M Steen; Magda Tsolaki; Kristine M Ulrichsen; Bruno Vellas; Lei Wang; Eric Westman; Georg C Ziegler; Mathias Zink; Ole A Andreassen; Lars T Westlye
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Brain age prediction using deep learning uncovers associated sequence variants.

Authors:  B A Jonsson; G Bjornsdottir; T E Thorgeirsson; L M Ellingsen; G Bragi Walters; D F Gudbjartsson; H Stefansson; K Stefansson; M O Ulfarsson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  From a deep learning model back to the brain-Identifying regional predictors and their relation to aging.

Authors:  Gidon Levakov; Gideon Rosenthal; Ilan Shelef; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Galia Avidan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Local Brain-Age: A U-Net Model.

Authors:  Sebastian G Popescu; Ben Glocker; David J Sharp; James H Cole
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.750

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.