Literature DB >> 28765056

Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker.

James H Cole1, Rudra P K Poudel2, Dimosthenis Tsagkrasoulis3, Matthan W A Caan4, Claire Steves5, Tim D Spector5, Giovanni Montana6.   

Abstract

Machine learning analysis of neuroimaging data can accurately predict chronological age in healthy people. Deviations from healthy brain ageing have been associated with cognitive impairment and disease. Here we sought to further establish the credentials of 'brain-predicted age' as a biomarker of individual differences in the brain ageing process, using a predictive modelling approach based on deep learning, and specifically convolutional neural networks (CNN), and applied to both pre-processed and raw T1-weighted MRI data. Firstly, we aimed to demonstrate the accuracy of CNN brain-predicted age using a large dataset of healthy adults (N = 2001). Next, we sought to establish the heritability of brain-predicted age using a sample of monozygotic and dizygotic female twins (N = 62). Thirdly, we examined the test-retest and multi-centre reliability of brain-predicted age using two samples (within-scanner N = 20; between-scanner N = 11). CNN brain-predicted ages were generated and compared to a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) approach, on all datasets. Input data were grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) volumetric maps generated by Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) or raw data. CNN accurately predicted chronological age using GM (correlation between brain-predicted age and chronological age r = 0.96, mean absolute error [MAE] = 4.16 years) and raw (r = 0.94, MAE = 4.65 years) data. This was comparable to GPR brain-predicted age using GM data (r = 0.95, MAE = 4.66 years). Brain-predicted age was a heritable phenotype for all models and input data (h2 ≥ 0.5). Brain-predicted age showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.90-0.99). Multi-centre reliability was more variable within high ICCs for GM (0.83-0.96) and poor-moderate levels for WM and raw data (0.51-0.77). Brain-predicted age represents an accurate, highly reliable and genetically-influenced phenotype, that has potential to be used as a biomarker of brain ageing. Moreover, age predictions can be accurately generated on raw T1-MRI data, substantially reducing computation time for novel data, bringing the process closer to giving real-time information on brain health in clinical settings.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Brain ageing; Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Gaussian processes; Heritability; Neuroimaging; Reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765056     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  148 in total

1.  Transfer learning improves resting-state functional connectivity pattern analysis using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Pál Vakli; Regina J Deák-Meszlényi; Petra Hermann; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.524

2.  Charting shared developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and structural connectivity in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  Gareth Ball; Richard Beare; Marc L Seal
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Investigating systematic bias in brain age estimation with application to post-traumatic stress disorders.

Authors:  Hualou Liang; Fengqing Zhang; Xin Niu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Accelerating research on biological aging and mental health: Current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Laura K M Han; Josine E Verhoeven; Audrey R Tyrka; Brenda W J H Penninx; Owen M Wolkowitz; Kristoffer N T Månsson; Daniel Lindqvist; Marco P Boks; Dóra Révész; Synthia H Mellon; Martin Picard
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.905

5.  Structure-function multi-scale connectomics reveals a major role of the fronto-striato-thalamic circuit in brain aging.

Authors:  Paolo Bonifazi; Asier Erramuzpe; Ibai Diez; Iñigo Gabilondo; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Lisa Pauwels; Sebastiano Stramaglia; Stephan P Swinnen; Jesus M Cortes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  BRAIN AGE ESTIMATION USING LSTM ON CHILDREN'S BRAIN MRI.

Authors:  Sheng He; Randy L Gollub; Shawn N Murphy; Juan David Perez; Sanjay Prabhu; Rudolph Pienaar; Richard L Robertson; P Ellen Grant; Yangming Ou
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2020-05-22

7.  Evaluation of non-negative matrix factorization of grey matter in age prediction.

Authors:  Deepthi P Varikuti; Sarah Genon; Aristeidis Sotiras; Holger Schwender; Felix Hoffstaedter; Kaustubh R Patil; Christiane Jockwitz; Svenja Caspers; Susanne Moebus; Katrin Amunts; Christos Davatzikos; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  NAPR: a Cloud-Based Framework for Neuroanatomical Age Prediction.

Authors:  Heath R Pardoe; Ruben Kuzniecky
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-01

9.  BRAIN AGE PREDICTION BASED ON RESTING-STATE FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY PATTERNS USING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS.

Authors:  Hongming Li; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Yong Fan
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-05-24

10.  Anatomical Context Protects Deep Learning from Adversarial Perturbations in Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Yi Li; Huahong Zhang; Camilo Bermudez; Yifan Chen; Bennett A Landman; Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.719

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.