Literature DB >> 33716630

Optimization of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Roberto Cuomo1, Francesco Ruben Giardino1, Alessandro Neri2, Giuseppe Nisi1, Cesare Brandi1, Irene Zerini1, Han Jingjian3, Luca Grimaldi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) were introduced in the early 2000s and more recently permitted new protocols for breast reconstruction allowing a short operative time with improved outcomes until the new muscle-sparing breast reconstruction proposed in 2014 using the Braxon® ADM. The aim of this research is to propose a technique to improve the aesthetic outcome using Braxon ADM with prepectoral implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The enrolled patients were submitted to a nipple skin-sparing mastectomy leaving 1 additional centimeter of subcutis on the proximal part of the upper pole of the breast (see Surgical Technique). Aesthetic outcomes were compared to those obtained with traditional breast reconstruction with prosthesis and the Braxon ADM placed in the prepectoral space. Mean values of aesthetic outcomes were analyzed using the Student t test, and the κ test was used to analyze interobserver variability.
RESULTS: The overall aesthetic score was improved of 29.6% of the patients; in particular the most improved score was that for contour (+98.01%). Statistical significance was found for contour, upper pole definition, and total score average (p < 0.05). The κ test showed interobserver variability with a good level of agreement on contour (κ = 0.832).
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique has allowed attainment of good results in terms of aesthetic outcomes. In a small sample we did not register any particular complications but we verified a better satisfaction on the evaluation of the aesthetic result (level of evidence: 3).
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acellular dermal matrix; Braxon; Breast; Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction

Year:  2020        PMID: 33716630      PMCID: PMC7923878          DOI: 10.1159/000506347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  18 in total

1.  Gigantic Paget disease of the breast.

Authors:  G Nicoletti; S Scevola; R Ruggiero; A Morelli Coghi; G S Toussoun
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  [Esthetic results of breast reconstruction after amputation for cancer. 323 cases].

Authors:  J R Garbay; M Rietjens; J Y Petit
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  1992

3.  Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings.

Authors:  Karl H Breuing; Stephen M Warren
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  History of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Theodore W Uroskie; Lawrence B Colen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Muscle-Sparing ADM-Assisted Breast Reconstruction Technique Using Complete Breast Implant Coverage: A Dual-Institute UK-Based Experience.

Authors:  Raghavan Vidya; Simon J Cawthorn
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Pieter G L Koolen; Oren Ganor; Mark K Markarian; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin; Marc A M Mureau
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesive for skin closure: eight years experience.

Authors:  Luca Grimaldi; Roberto Cuomo; Cesare Brandi; Gaia Botteri; Giuseppe Nisi; Carlo D'Aniello
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Jaime Schwartz; Joseph H Dayan; Mark W Clemens
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon®.

Authors:  Sadaf Jafferbhoy; Mihir Chandarana; Maria Houlihan; Rishikesh Parmeshwar; Sankaran Narayanan; Soni Soumian; Simon Harries; Lucie Jones; Dayalan Clarke
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

10.  Complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ian C Hoppe; Janet H Yueh; Cindy H Wei; Naveen K Ahuja; Priti P Patel; Ramazi O Datiashvili
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-11-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Positive ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) Modulator Engineered Device Support Skin Treatment in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) Enhancing Patient Quality of Life.

Authors:  Donato Casella; Paolo Palumbo; Sara Sandroni; Claudio Caponi; Francesca Littori; Francesca Capuano; Luca Grimaldi; Marco Marcasciano; Roberto Cuomo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Pre-Pectoral One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with Anterior Coverage Using Superior Anterior Biological Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and Inferior Anterior Dermal Sling Support.

Authors:  Andrea Sisti; Payam Sadeghi; Roberto Cuomo; Sonia M Alvarez
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  "Tear-Drop Appearance" Wrap: A Novel Implant Coverage Method for Creating Natural Contour in Prepectoral Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hong-Il Kim; Byeong-Seok Kim; Jin-Hyung Park; Hyung-Suk Yi; Hyo-Young Kim; Jin-Hyuk Choi; Sung-Ui Jung; Yoon-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  The State of the Art about Etiopathogenetic Models on Breast Implant Associated-Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL): A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Roberto Cuomo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.