Literature DB >> 19052809

Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation.

Scott L Spear1, Jaime Schwartz, Joseph H Dayan, Mark W Clemens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animation deformity or breast distortion during pectoralis muscle contraction following subpectoral breast augmentation is a known entity, but its prevalence and significance remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence and severity of animation deformity as well as its effect on patient satisfaction and interference with certain activities.
METHODS: All procedures were performed by the senior author using a variation of a previously described dual-plane technique. The first part of this study was an evaluation of breast distortion by a group of independent observers in a series of 40 consecutive patients who underwent primary subpectoral breast augmentation. The second part of the study was a questionnaire sent to 195 consecutive patients asking about overall satisfaction, degree of animation deformity, and whether there was interference with any activities.
RESULTS: Of the 40 patients' photographs that were evaluated, 9 (22.5%) had no distortion, 25 (62.5%) had minimal distortion, 4 (10%) had moderate distortion, and 2 (5%) had severe distortion. Of the 195 questionnaires, there were 69 responses, a 35% response rate. Fifty-six (82%) described mild to no distortion, 7 (10%) were moderate, and 5 (7%) were severe. According to the survey, the most common activities that were problematic were lifting weights and exercising (24 and 19%, respectively). Only one (1%) patient stated that she would not recommend subpectoral positioning.
CONCLUSION: Although animation deformities do exist, nearly all patients in this study would still choose subpectoral positioning. Patients who may be better candidates for subglandular placement are those for whom exercise is central to their daily living. As a result of this study, surgeons and patients should have more accurate and reliable information regarding the significance of animation deformity after subpectoral breast augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19052809     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  46 in total

1.  Invited Discussion on: Muscle-Splitting Transaxillary Breast Implant Revision Surgery: a Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Closs Ono; Ruth Graf
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  Strategies and considerations in selecting between subpectoral and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

Review 3.  An overview of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Megan Fracol; Lauren N Feld; Wen-Kuan Chiu; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

4.  The role of fat grafting in prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Halley Darrach; Franca Kraenzlin; Nima Khavanin; Karan Chopra; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

Review 5.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan Kaplan; Ryan D Wagner; Tara L Braun; Carrie Chu; Sebastian J Winocour
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Development and Psychometric Validation of the BREAST-Q Animation Deformity Scale for Women Undergoing an Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Authors:  Elena Tsangaris; Andrea L Pusic; Manraj N Kaur; Sophocles Voineskos; Louise Bordeleau; Toni Zhong; Raghavan Vidya; Justin Broyles; Anne F Klassen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A retrospective study of primary breast augmentation: recovery period, complications and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Haishan Shi; Chuan Cao; Xiaoge Li; Liang Chen; Shirong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

8.  Single stage, direct to implant pre-pectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Glyn Jones; Anuja K Antony
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

9.  Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon®.

Authors:  Sadaf Jafferbhoy; Mihir Chandarana; Maria Houlihan; Rishikesh Parmeshwar; Sankaran Narayanan; Soni Soumian; Simon Harries; Lucie Jones; Dayalan Clarke
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

10.  Jumping Breast Phenomenon Following Subcutaneous Mastectomy: First Description and Grading of a Well-Known Breast Deformity.

Authors:  Sherko Kümmel; Aylin Kümmel; Friederike Hagemann; Anna Rüland; Christine Dittmer-Grabowski; Suzan Botzenhardt; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Mattea Reinisch
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.