Literature DB >> 33716405

Dynamics of COVID-19 transmission with comorbidity: a data driven modelling based approach.

Parthasakha Das1, Sk Shahid Nadim2, Samhita Das1, Pritha Das1.   

Abstract

An outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic is a major public health disease as well as a challenging task to people with comorbidity worldwide. According to a report, comorbidity enhances the risk factors with complications of COVID-19. Here, we propose and explore a mathematical framework to study the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 with comorbidity. Within this framework, the model is calibrated by using new daily confirmed COVID-19 cases in India. The qualitative properties of the model and the stability of feasible equilibrium are studied. The model experiences the scenario of backward bifurcation by parameter regime accounting for progress in susceptibility to acquire infection by comorbidity individuals. The endemic equilibrium is asymptotically stable if recruitment of comorbidity becomes higher without acquiring the infection. Moreover, a larger backward bifurcation regime indicates the possibility of more infection in susceptible individuals. A dynamics in the mean fluctuation of the force of infection is investigated with different parameter regimes. A significant correlation is established between the force of infection and corresponding Shannon entropy under the same parameters, which provides evidence that infection reaches a significant proportion of the susceptible.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Backward bifurcation; COVID-19; Comorbidity; Model calibration; Sensitivity analysis; Shannon entropy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33716405      PMCID: PMC7937518          DOI: 10.1007/s11071-021-06324-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn        ISSN: 0924-090X            Impact factor:   5.022


Introduction

COVID-19 was announced by the World health organization (WHO) as a major health hazard at the end of 2019. This was first seen in Wuhan province, China [1]. After that this infectious disease has been spread out in the whole world. To defeat the epidemic, the different countries of the world were in a lockdown scenario, the also successively unlock process due to socioeconomic and political impacts [2-6]. Moreover, the mortality and morbidity rate has varied across countries of the worlds [7-9]. COVID-19 is often present in human being as common symptoms, for example, cold-like illness including fever, muscle pain, fatigue, loss of taste and smell, sore throat, and dry cough [10-13]. COVID-19 can be transmitted from people to people through respiratory droplets from an infected human being or direct contact with contaminated surfaces or objects [14, 15]. As all vaccinations are in trial positions for the prevention of COVID-19. Various studies have pointed out the stage of comorbidity co-infection (like lung disease, heart disease, diabetes, etc) among the infected people. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, all people with comorbidity or medical condition have more risk to become infected than healthy or normal human being [16-18]. From the survey of clinical reports, this is further suggested that the confirmed COVID-19 patients are most having comorbidity co-infection which includes kidney disease, obesity those having basal metabolic rate (BMR) more than thirty, type-2 diabetes, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) [19-21]. Moreover, sometimes this confirmed COVID-19 with comorbidity were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). New daily cases of COVID-19 follow a very highly volatile pattern, i.e, deceasing-increasing arbitrarily [22, 23]. To implement fruitful public health measures in a scheduled time within a certain resource according to geographical state [24], it is utmost essential to study the diffusion or force of infection among the wider population. In order to explain this observation, entropy helps us to determine the heterogeneity of a daily number of cases and time of highest diffusion or force of infection [25]. Various methods of measuring entropy, like weighted entropy [26], maximum entropy [27], evolutionary Entropy [28], structural Entropy [29] are employed to forecast and study the transmission dynamics of pandemic like, COVID-19 [30, 31]. Here, the concept of Shannon entropy is indeed used and seemed to be appropriate to determine the spread of an epidemic as there is a significant analogy based on Boltzmann’s classical thermodynamical paradigm [32]. Various mathematical models have been formulated and studied the corresponding dynamics [33, 34]. Lie et al. proposed a data-driven COVID-19 model with distributed delay [35]. Global dynamics of a COVID-19 SEIR epidemic model has been investigated by Khyar et al. [36]. Further, different authors have suggested control strategies for disease transmission of COVID-19 [37-39]. The main aim of this paper is to study the qualitative behavior of COVID-19 transmission dynamics by bifurcation theory. Various qualitative dynamics have been studied in different mathematical model [40-42]. For this purpose, data-driven modeling is a powerful tool to investigate dynamical behavior in infectious disease [43]. Various mathematical models have been devolved as well as investigated the transmission dynamic of COVID-19 [44-48]. Indeed, considering comorbidity in modelling of COVID-19 is of noteworthy interest in ongoing studies and also has not been yet investigated according to literature. Schematic illustration of SCEAIHR model. The flow diagram exhibits the interaction of different stages of individuals in the model: susceptible (S), comorbidity (C), exposed (E), asymptomatic (A), infected (I), hospitalized (H) and recovered (R) The subsequent parts of the paper are as follows: In Sect. 2, we propose and explore a mathematical model of COVID-19 with comorbidity. The qualitative dynamics is investigated at feasible equilibrium by performing bifurcation analysis in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, the model is calibrated and sensitivity analysis is also performed. Moreover, the transmission dynamics of mean fluctuation in force of infection is studied by measuring the corresponding Shannon entropy. Finally, in Sect. 5, we discuss and conclude the results from our proposed study.

Mathematical model

We develop here a SCEAIHR-type model by introducing threatened or comorbidity susceptible and hospitalized individuals in the dynamics of COVID-19 (SARS-Cov-2). The model consists of seven compartments, namely, susceptible individuals (S), comorbidity susceptible individuals (C), exposed individuals (E), asymptomatic individual (A), infected or infectious individuals with clinical symptoms (I), diagnosed and hospitalized individuals (H) and recovered individuals with no more infections (R). The total number of individuals is . Our main aim is to study the dynamics of COVID-19 with comorbidity co-infection. Based on a biological viewpoint, we formulate a nonlinear mathematical model to investigate the COVID-19 or SARS-Cov-2 pandemic in a certain time window: The values of the parameters used in the SCEAIHR model (1) The following initial values are considered in model (1) as follows:Here, it is assumed that , where indicates the initial date of the outbreak of COVID-19 for the model (1). Susceptible individuals are generated by the recruitment of persons by birth or immigration to the community at a constant rate of . Population decreases after infection and can be transmitted at a rate , and by direct interaction between susceptible individuals with symptomatic infected, asymptomatic infected and hospitalized individuals respectively and at a rate , and by direct interaction between co-morbid susceptible individuals with symptomatic infected, asymptomatic individuals and hospitalized individuals respectively. Also, susceptible individuals often develop co-morbidity at a rate of . It is assumed that there is a recovery rate for asymptomatic, symptomatic, and hospitalized individuals, such as , , and respectively. The model incorporates certain demographic impacts by estimating the disease-induced mortality rate of hospitalized persons and natural death rate of each of the seven subpopulations. After the disease incubation period, , a fraction of the exposed individuals are symptomatically infected and the remaining fraction become asymptomatically infected. The exposed population also decreased at a rate of due to natural death. The pictorial diagram of our model is presented in Fig. 1. The description of model parameters is provided in Table 1.
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of SCEAIHR model. The flow diagram exhibits the interaction of different stages of individuals in the model: susceptible (S), comorbidity (C), exposed (E), asymptomatic (A), infected (I), hospitalized (H) and recovered (R)

Table 1

The values of the parameters used in the SCEAIHR model (1)

ParameterDescriptionValueReference
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Pi _s=\mu \times N$$\end{document}Πs=μ×NAverage recruitment rate4.7387 \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\times $$\end{document}× \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$10^4$$\end{document}104
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta _s$$\end{document}βsTransmission rate1.6746Estimated
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\delta _a$$\end{document}δaModification factor for asymptomatic0.4499Estimated
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\delta _h$$\end{document}δhModification factor for hospitalized0.2918Estimated
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\phi _s$$\end{document}ϕsRate of comorbidity development by susceptible0.0000017Estimated
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\frac{1}{\mu }$$\end{document}1μAverage life expectancy at birth70.4 years[50]
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho $$\end{document}ρModification factor for comorbidity development0.1433Estimated
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\frac{1}{\alpha _e}$$\end{document}1αeCOVID-19 incubation period5.2 days[51]
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\xi $$\end{document}ξFraction of exposed individuals to become infected0.62[52]
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _a$$\end{document}γaRecovery rate of asymptomatic individuals0.73[52]
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _i$$\end{document}γiRecovery rate of infected individuals0.79[52]
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\theta $$\end{document}θAverage on hospitalized rate of infected individuals0.1037Estimated
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\gamma _h$$\end{document}γhRecovery rate of hospitalized individuals0.8368[53]
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta $$\end{document}ηAverage case fatality rate0.0156[53]

SCEAIHR model analysis

In this section, we study some basic properties of the SCEAIHR model (1) such as positivity and boundedness, basic reproduction number, stability analysis at biologically feasible equilibrium points with non-negative initial conditions .

Lemma 3.1

For initial values (2), the solutions of SCEAIHR model (1) remain positive through out the region in for all

Proof

To establish the positivity of the system (1), we take any solution emerging from non-negative region which remain positive for all In order to do this, we prove that the points of vector field on the each hyper plane are bounded by non-negative region . In the system (1), we see that Here, this assures the positivity of solutions in the region . is established as positive invariant set of SCEAIHR model.

Lemma 3.2

For initial values (2), the solutions of SCEAIHR model (1) are uniformly bounded in the region In order to prove boundedness, we sum up all equations in the model (1), which provides Differentiating both sides, we getwhich implies Without of loss of generality, we can express all equations in model (1) as . So, a bounded set can be definedwhich is further a positive invariant set to the SCEAIHR model (1). Therefore, all solution trajectories initiating from interior of always remain within the domain . this assures that the growth of all individuals can’t be unbounded or exponential for time time window.

Infection free equilibrium and basic reproduction number

The basic reproduction number is a threshold value and characterizes the infectious disease. This is denoted by and defined by the number of secondarily infected individuals induced by single infected individuals as infectious during its incubation period within susceptible individuals. is a dimensionless number and quantifies the expectation of decreasing or increasing the disease outbreak. The system (1) has infection free equilibrium , given by 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0). The compartment E, A, I, H in system (1) are explicitly associated with disease outbreak. Thus we get matrix , for new infection and transition part respectively, given byThe variational matrix and , where can be calculated at The basic reproduction number is dominant eigenvalue of matrix So, we obtain

Stability of infection free equilibrium

Theorem 1

The infection-free equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable if and unstable

Proof

The variational matrix J of the system (1) is given byFor our convenience, we considerThe matrix at has unique and repeated eigenvalues as and respectively. The rest of eigenvalues are the roots of following equation as follow:which can be expressed as follow:DenoteNow substitute , if , where, represents real part of , thenConsequently, , which implies . So, eigenvalues corresponding characteristic equation have negative real parts for Thus, for , all eigenvalues are negative. According to Routh–Hurwitz stability criterion, infection free equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable for Again, if we consider , i.e, thenthen, there exits so that . This means that there exits non-negative eigenvalue in matrix Hence, infection free equilibrium is unstable for

Existence of endemic equilibrium

Here, we study the existence of endemic equilibrium. Let be any endemic equilibrium of system (1). Moreover, The force of infection isBy solving the system (1) at equilibrium state, we get , , , , and . Substituting the all expressions into (5), we get the non- zero equilibrium of (1) which satisfies quadratic equation in as follow:where,From (6), we can obtain endemic equilibrium of (1). Here, the coefficient A is always positive. The sign of coefficient C depends on lesser or greater value of than unity. It can be noted that multiple endemic equilibrium can be coexist for Thus, we can summarize as follows:

Theorem 2

The system (1) has two endemic equilibrium if and and at least one endemic equilibrium if iff a unique endemic equilibrium if ( and ) or no endemic equilibrium if iff and From the above theorem, it can be noted that backward bifurcation is possible due to the coexistence of stable infection-free and endemic equilibrium for For this purpose, we find a critical value of for unique endemic equilibrium as follow:Hence, backward bifurcation can occur with specific restriction . Now, we turn on the analysis for backward bifurcation.

Backward bifurcation

In order to investigate backward bifurcation at endemic equilibrium , we apply centre manifold theorem by considering bifurcation parameter , corresponded to From variational matrix J in (3), we again consider few entries as follows:Now, the variational matrix of system (1) at has right eigenvector corresponding to zero eigenvalue, given by , whereSimilarly, at at , the variational matrix of system (1) has left eigenvector corresponding to zero eigenvalue, given by , whereWe introduce a few notations for SCEAIHR model system as follows: and where Now, we compute second order partial of at infection-free equilibrium and obtainThe remaining partial derivatives at are zero. Now we evaluate the coefficient a and b of well-established Theorem 4.1 in Castillo-Chavez et al. [49] as follows:Now, we substitute all above values to find the coefficient a and b at threshold , we getandHere, the value of b is always positive, the system (1) undergoes backward bifurcation at if , i.ewhere,

Theorem 3

The SCEAIHR model system (1) exhibits a backward bifurcation at , if the parametric restriction in (9) holds. Moreover, as comorbidity individual becomes always infected, backward bifurcation occurs in SCEAIHR model. Now for a case, it can be noted that comorbidity individuals do not get infection due to maintaining social distancing, wearing mask and proper sanitation, i.e, The bifurcation coefficient a is as follow :As, , , by Theorem 4.1 in Castillo-Chavez et al., a transcritical bifurcation occurs at for and endemic equilibrium and the endemic equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable for Here, a backward bifurcation do not exist for .

Theorem 4

The SCEAIHR model system (1) experiences a transcritical bifurcation at with parametric restriction in (9) holds, i.e, .

Computer simulation and results

In this section, we perform numerical simulation and its biological interpretation to complement the analytical findings. In the previous section, local stability for infection-free equilibrium and the existence of endemic equilibrium are studied. Moreover, backward bifurcation and transcritical bifurcation are observed. In order to validate the analytical findings, we estimate parameter values of the SCEAIHR model (1).

Model calibration

For the duration from March, 2020 to October, 2020 is considered for model calibration. For this analysis, we have taken daily COVID-19 cases in India. Daily cases notified by COVID-19 were obtained for India from [53]. The model (1) is fitted for new hospitalized COVID cases in India on a regular basis. Due to the high infectivity, the notified patients become hospitalized quickly and it is also easy to confirm the hospitalized cases from the recorded results. We have enlisted the main model parameters, which are estimated from the data in Table 1. By adopting the model to the new regular cases reported, six parameters of the model have been estimated, such as (a) transmission rate (), (b) modification factor for asymptomatic () and symptomatic (), (c) rate of co-morbidity development by susceptible individuals (), (d) modification factor for comorbidity development () and (e) average hospitalized rate of infected individuals (). The data will also estimate some of the initial conditions of the model (1). In MATLAB, the nonlinear least-square solver has been used during the defined time span to fit the simulated new daily data of COVID-19 recorded by India. The confidence area is generated by using the Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis (DRAM) algorithm. A description of this model fitting technique is given in [54]. Tables 1 and 2 provide the parameters and initial conditions respectively, which are estimated by the above technique. The fitting of India’s daily new hospitalized COVID-19 cases is seen in Fig. 2. The basic reproduction number is estimated at by using the fixed parameters from Table 1 and parameters that are estimated from the model.
Table 2

Estimated initial population sizes for India

Initial valuesValueSource
S(0)1,037,297,349Estimated
C(0)1,803,340,169Estimated
E(0)3151Estimated
A(0)9995[52]
I(0)9997[52]
J(0)86[53]
R(0)1[53]
Fig. 2

The SCEAIHR model fitted to daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases in India. Observed data points are shown in black dots and the solid red line depicts the model simulated curve

In order to recognize the most significant parameters to infected individual, we next perform sensitivity analysis followed by uncertainty analysis. Estimated initial population sizes for India The SCEAIHR model fitted to daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases in India. Observed data points are shown in black dots and the solid red line depicts the model simulated curve Sensitivity indices of the parameters of SCEAIHR model (1) to I and . i= 100, 150, 200 th day

Sensitivity analysis

We apply PRCC(Partial rank correlation coefficient) method for sensitivity analysis and LHS (Latin hypercube sampling) method for uncertainty analysis. A detailed technique can obtained in Marino et. al, [55]. We assign uniform distribution the parameters namely, , , , , , and with confidence domain. We consider baseline values as parameter values. The outputs are given in Table 3 with bar diagram in Fig. 3a. From Fig. 3a, it can be seen that , and are influential parameter to infected individual. Moreover, we study the sensitivity indices of basic reproduction number . Here, only is negatively correlated, and , , , and are positively correlated to , given in Fig. 3b.
Table 3

Sensitivity indices of the parameters of SCEAIHR model (1) to I and . i= 100, 150, 200 th day

Description \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\beta _s$$\end{document}βs \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\delta _a$$\end{document}δa \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\delta _h$$\end{document}δh \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\rho $$\end{document}ρ \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\theta $$\end{document}θ \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\phi _s$$\end{document}ϕs \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta $$\end{document}η \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\xi $$\end{document}ξ
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$I_{100}$$\end{document}I100 0.32210.06220.04410.1918\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0418\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0235\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0321\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0914
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$I_{150}$$\end{document}I150 0.22140.04150.03500.1261\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.03580.0113\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0372\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0811
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$I_{200}$$\end{document}I200 0.17860.03210.02710.0938\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.02040.0225\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0407\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.0830
\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$R_0$$\end{document}R0 0.84000.4962\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.00350.7630\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.1093\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.5842\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$-$$\end{document}-0.06360.3401
Fig. 3

a and b PRCC indicating sensitivity indices to infected individual (I) and basic reproduction number . PRCC values of various parameters with the level of significance 0.05. Sample size = 500 for each parameters is taken based on LHS approach with uniform probability distribution

a and b PRCC indicating sensitivity indices to infected individual (I) and basic reproduction number . PRCC values of various parameters with the level of significance 0.05. Sample size = 500 for each parameters is taken based on LHS approach with uniform probability distribution As basic reproduction number quantifies the expectation of decreasing or increasing the epidemic evolution, we next study the effects of parameter variation on .

Effects of parametric variation on basic reproduction number

We further study the effects of parameter variations on basic reproduction number under , , in Fig. 4. We observe that only the increasing value of can change to in Fig. 4a. From Fig. 4b, the increasing value simultaneously changes the value of . Further, it can be also seen that the value of always remains less than one within the parametric plane of .
Fig. 4

Contour plots indicating the nature of change in basic reproduction number() of SCEAIHR model under parametric planes. a versus . b versus . (c) versus

Contour plots indicating the nature of change in basic reproduction number() of SCEAIHR model under parametric planes. a versus . b versus . (c) versus

Bifurcation diagram

On investigation of the existence of endemic equilibrium, we derive the sub-threshold range of bistable equilibrium in the SCEAIHR model (1). Thus backward bifurcation can be seen within the domain with , given in Fig. 5a, where two positive endemic equilibrium coexist, i.e, asymptotically stable equilibrium (blue line) and unstable equilibrium (red line). From an epidemiological viewpoint, the scenario of backward bifurcation indicates that the model possesses two endemic equilibrium. However, infection-free equilibrium can exist only for . Indeed, this restriction is sufficient for the eradication of infection from the system. Moreover, it sometimes depends on the initial size of the sub-population of model.
Fig. 5

a versus plot indicating backward bifurcation of SCEAIHR model in . b versus plot illustrating transcritical bifurcation of SCEAIHR model in with . All the remaining parameters values are reported in Table 1

On the other hand, if comorbidity individuals do not acquire infection, i.e, , the model (1) experiences transcritical with given in Fig. 5b. Here, only one endemic equilibrium (blue line) and infection-free equilibrium (red line) exist for It indicates that force of infection is not strong enough to spread out as all susceptible individuals take the precaution of disease spreading, like, wearing a mask, social distancing, maintaining sanitation. Moreover, it can be also noted that increasing the value of becomes a challenging task for the eradication of infection. Numerically, it can be seen that a backward bifurcation regime increases gradually with increases of with , given in Fig. 6. Consequently, the value of is essential to be reduced to ensure the eradication of infection in such a way that and is close to one.
Fig. 6

Impacts of variation in , on backward bifurcation with , keeping all parameters value remained same as in Table 1. The diagram exhibits that the extent of backward bifurcation regime increases gradually with the increasing of

a versus plot indicating backward bifurcation of SCEAIHR model in . b versus plot illustrating transcritical bifurcation of SCEAIHR model in with . All the remaining parameters values are reported in Table 1 Impacts of variation in , on backward bifurcation with , keeping all parameters value remained same as in Table 1. The diagram exhibits that the extent of backward bifurcation regime increases gradually with the increasing of Now we study the variation of infection intensity. For this purpose, we consider average of force of infection for daily basis cases.

Effects of parametric variation on force of infection

Now we investigate the fluctuation of force of infection by considering , where N being length of series . Figure 7a, b exhibit the fluctuations of average force of infection under and respectively. From Fig. 7a, b, increasing and decreasing trend can be observed in respectively. It indicates that average force of infection decreases with the increase of and average force of infection increases with the increase of in the model (1). Moreover, in order to understand the combined effect under on , a matrix plot is given in Fig. 7c. In Fig. 7c, it can be mentioned that the average force of infection is dependent on value of for any value of , defined in efferent color region of increased value of In order to quantitative measure the degree of disorder in force of infection. Shannon entropy [32] is employed for this purpose. Here, disorder means the non-uniform distribution of infection under distribution of susceptible.
Fig. 7

a, b represent versus plot (with and versus plot (with . c represent over matrix plot, where . The corresponding color bar indicates values of . The values of the other parameters are taken as same, shown in Table 1

a, b represent versus plot (with and versus plot (with . c represent over matrix plot, where . The corresponding color bar indicates values of . The values of the other parameters are taken as same, shown in Table 1 a, b represent versus plot (with and versus plot (with . (c) represent over matrix plot, where . The corresponding color bar indicates values of . The values of the other parameters are taken as same, shown in Table 1

Entropy in force of infection

Shannon entropy is generally defined asN being length of event and is probability of event , i.e, relative frequency of occurrence of non-recurrent event . The trend of on and are shown in Fig. 8a, b. Figure 8a shows that deceasing trend of with increase of . On the contrary, increases with in Fig. 8b. From Figs.7a, b and 8a, b, it can be noted that the trend of is highly correlated with the fluctuation in force of infection . Moreover, we also plot in Fig. 8c to study the dependence of on . Further comparing Figs. 7c and 8, we observe similar pattern of increasing entropy between and . This result reveals the additional evidence about the measure of dynamical disorder in force of infection in the model (1) for parameter regimes.
Fig. 8

a, b represent versus plot (with and versus plot (with . (c) represent over matrix plot, where . The corresponding color bar indicates values of . The values of the other parameters are taken as same, shown in Table 1

Discussion and conclusion

In this paper, we have proposed and studied a mathematical model for disease dynamics of COVID-19 accounting of impacts of comorbidities on the complication of COVID-19. The proposed model has been calibrated by using new daily cases of India. The qualitative properties of the model have been studied and the basic reproduction number has been calculated by the method of the next-generation matrix. The model has asymptotically stable infection-free equilibrium for less than a unity of basic reproduction number. Using the center manifold theorem, the phenomena of backward bifurcation have been observed for increasing the modification factor of comorbidity development. This indicates that infection persists for less than a unity of basic reproduction number. The occurrence of backward bifurcation assures the rich dynamics of the model. From an epidemiological viewpoint, comorbidity individuals acquire more re-infection due to lack of surveillance and precautions like wearing masks, social distancing, proper sanitation, etc. Further, endemic equilibrium has become asymptotically stable if the modification factor for comorbidity is zero (), i,e. none of the comorbidity individual gets an infection and keeps maintained themselves with high surveillance. In these circumstances, more susceptible individuals have acquired infection and become exposed individuals as basic reproduction is more than unity, indeed, exposed individuals have a strong immunity to prevent COVID-19 infection in this context. Moreover, the increase of comorbidity development and modification factor simultaneously has increased the backward bifurcation regimes. Consequently, this can lead to a disaster situation. Sensitivity analysis of the model reveals that transmission rate (), modification factor of comorbidity development (), comorbidity development () have a significant influence on infected individuals and basic reproduction number (). In order to control disease transmission, a policy might be implemented by enhancing surveillance with proper maintaining sanitation and keep safe from infected individuals. On investigation of the pattern of transmission dynamics, the mean fluctuations of the force of infection have shown decreasing as well as increasing trend with comorbidity development () and transmission rate (). Consequently, the combined effect has shown an increasing trend to the average force of infection. From the dynamical viewpoint, the measure of disorder in force of infection, i.e, the Shannon entropy has provided evidence towards the higher entropy production indicating the more powerful force of infection, i.e, the infection reaches a significant proportion in susceptible individuals. This might lead to a devastating situation in society regarding disease transmission. Finally, our study assures that the increase of force of infection builds up with the enhanced entropy production attributed to highly disorder in epidemic evolution. The production of entropy are concepts that can be helpful to guide computational biologists to elucidate the associations between mean fluctuation and changes in parameters to develop policy in disease control and novel vaccination strategies. Thus, it would be useful to include in future publications how vaccination policy can be fruitful.
  42 in total

1.  Rapid simulation of spatial epidemics: a spectral method.

Authors:  Samuel P C Brand; Michael J Tildesley; Matthew J Keeling
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Exploring dynamical complexity in a time-delayed tumor-immune model.

Authors:  Parthasakha Das; Ranjit Kumar Upadhyay; Pritha Das; Dibakar Ghosh
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.642

3.  SEIR modeling of the COVID-19 and its dynamics.

Authors:  Shaobo He; Yuexi Peng; Kehui Sun
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.022

4.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prevalence of COVID-19-related risk factors and risk of severe influenza outcomes in cancer survivors: A matched cohort study using linked English electronic health records data.

Authors:  Helena Carreira; Helen Strongman; Maria Peppa; Helen I McDonald; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Susannah Stanway; Liam Smeeth; Krishnan Bhaskaran
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-11-30

6.  Entropy Ratio and Entropy Concentration Coefficient, with Application to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Christoph Bandt
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  Potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria in low-income and middle-income countries: a modelling study.

Authors:  Alexandra B Hogan; Britta L Jewell; Ellie Sherrard-Smith; Juan F Vesga; Oliver J Watson; Charles Whittaker; Arran Hamlet; Jennifer A Smith; Peter Winskill; Robert Verity; Marc Baguelin; John A Lees; Lilith K Whittles; Kylie E C Ainslie; Samir Bhatt; Adhiratha Boonyasiri; Nicholas F Brazeau; Lorenzo Cattarino; Laura V Cooper; Helen Coupland; Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg; Amy Dighe; Bimandra A Djaafara; Christl A Donnelly; Jeff W Eaton; Sabine L van Elsland; Richard G FitzJohn; Han Fu; Katy A M Gaythorpe; William Green; David J Haw; Sarah Hayes; Wes Hinsley; Natsuko Imai; Daniel J Laydon; Tara D Mangal; Thomas A Mellan; Swapnil Mishra; Gemma Nedjati-Gilani; Kris V Parag; Hayley A Thompson; H Juliette T Unwin; Michaela A C Vollmer; Caroline E Walters; Haowei Wang; Yuanrong Wang; Xiaoyue Xi; Neil M Ferguson; Lucy C Okell; Thomas S Churcher; Nimalan Arinaminpathy; Azra C Ghani; Patrick G T Walker; Timothy B Hallett
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 26.763

8.  Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy.

Authors:  Giulia Giordano; Franco Blanchini; Raffaele Bruno; Patrizio Colaneri; Alessandro Di Filippo; Angela Di Matteo; Marta Colaneri
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 87.241

9.  The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health - The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  David S Hui; Esam I Azhar; Tariq A Madani; Francine Ntoumi; Richard Kock; Osman Dar; Giuseppe Ippolito; Timothy D Mchugh; Ziad A Memish; Christian Drosten; Alimuddin Zumla; Eskild Petersen
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Pattern transitions in spatial epidemics: Mechanisms and emergent properties.

Authors:  Gui-Quan Sun; Marko Jusup; Zhen Jin; Yi Wang; Zhen Wang
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  8 in total

1.  Study of COVID-19 epidemiological evolution in India with a multi-wave SIR model.

Authors:  Kalpita Ghosh; Asim Kumar Ghosh
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.741

2.  Mathematical model of COVID-19 with comorbidity and controlling using non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination.

Authors:  Parthasakha Das; Ranjit Kumar Upadhyay; Arvind Kumar Misra; Fathalla A Rihan; Pritha Das; Dibakar Ghosh
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.022

3.  Stochastic forecasting of COVID-19 daily new cases across countries with a novel hybrid time series model.

Authors:  Arinjita Bhattacharyya; Tanujit Chakraborty; Shesh N Rai
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.741

4.  Modelling policy combinations of vaccination and transmission suppression of SARS-CoV-2 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Naiara C M Valiati; Daniel A M Villela
Journal:  Infect Dis Model       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Dynamics of Caputo Fractional Order SEIRV Epidemic Model with Optimal Control and Stability Analysis.

Authors:  Animesh Mahata; Subrata Paul; Supriya Mukherjee; Meghadri Das; Banamali Roy
Journal:  Int J Appl Comput Math       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Estimation of exogenous drivers to predict COVID-19 pandemic using a method from nonlinear control theory.

Authors:  Christoph Hametner; Martin Kozek; Lukas Böhler; Alexander Wasserburger; Zhang Peng Du; Robert Kölbl; Michael Bergmann; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; Stefan Jakubek
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 5.022

7.  Global stability and analysing the sensitivity of parameters of a multiple-susceptible population model of SARS-CoV-2 emphasising vaccination drive.

Authors:  R Prem Kumar; P K Santra; G S Mahapatra
Journal:  Math Comput Simul       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 3.601

8.  Is Peracetic Acid Fumigation Effective in Public Transportation?

Authors:  Ewelina Kruszewska; Piotr Czupryna; Sławomir Pancewicz; Diana Martonik; Anna Bukłaha; Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.