| Literature DB >> 33716405 |
Parthasakha Das1, Sk Shahid Nadim2, Samhita Das1, Pritha Das1.
Abstract
An outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic is a major public health disease as well as a challenging task to people with comorbidity worldwide. According to a report, comorbidity enhances the risk factors with complications of COVID-19. Here, we propose and explore a mathematical framework to study the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 with comorbidity. Within this framework, the model is calibrated by using new daily confirmed COVID-19 cases in India. The qualitative properties of the model and the stability of feasible equilibrium are studied. The model experiences the scenario of backward bifurcation by parameter regime accounting for progress in susceptibility to acquire infection by comorbidity individuals. The endemic equilibrium is asymptotically stable if recruitment of comorbidity becomes higher without acquiring the infection. Moreover, a larger backward bifurcation regime indicates the possibility of more infection in susceptible individuals. A dynamics in the mean fluctuation of the force of infection is investigated with different parameter regimes. A significant correlation is established between the force of infection and corresponding Shannon entropy under the same parameters, which provides evidence that infection reaches a significant proportion of the susceptible.Entities:
Keywords: Backward bifurcation; COVID-19; Comorbidity; Model calibration; Sensitivity analysis; Shannon entropy
Year: 2021 PMID: 33716405 PMCID: PMC7937518 DOI: 10.1007/s11071-021-06324-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nonlinear Dyn ISSN: 0924-090X Impact factor: 5.022
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of SCEAIHR model. The flow diagram exhibits the interaction of different stages of individuals in the model: susceptible (S), comorbidity (C), exposed (E), asymptomatic (A), infected (I), hospitalized (H) and recovered (R)
The values of the parameters used in the SCEAIHR model (1)
| Parameter | Description | Value | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average recruitment rate | 4.7387 | – | |
| Transmission rate | 1.6746 | Estimated | |
| Modification factor for asymptomatic | 0.4499 | Estimated | |
| Modification factor for hospitalized | 0.2918 | Estimated | |
| Rate of comorbidity development by susceptible | 0.0000017 | Estimated | |
| Average life expectancy at birth | 70.4 years | [ | |
| Modification factor for comorbidity development | 0.1433 | Estimated | |
| COVID-19 incubation period | 5.2 days | [ | |
| Fraction of exposed individuals to become infected | 0.62 | [ | |
| Recovery rate of asymptomatic individuals | 0.73 | [ | |
| Recovery rate of infected individuals | 0.79 | [ | |
| Average on hospitalized rate of infected individuals | 0.1037 | Estimated | |
| Recovery rate of hospitalized individuals | 0.8368 | [ | |
| Average case fatality rate | 0.0156 | [ |
Estimated initial population sizes for India
| Initial values | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1,037,297,349 | Estimated | |
| 1,803,340,169 | Estimated | |
| 3151 | Estimated | |
| 9995 | [ | |
| 9997 | [ | |
| 86 | [ | |
| 1 | [ |
Fig. 2The SCEAIHR model fitted to daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases in India. Observed data points are shown in black dots and the solid red line depicts the model simulated curve
Sensitivity indices of the parameters of SCEAIHR model (1) to I and . i= 100, 150, 200 th day
| Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.3221 | 0.0622 | 0.0441 | 0.1918 | ||||
|
| 0.2214 | 0.0415 | 0.0350 | 0.1261 | 0.0113 | |||
|
| 0.1786 | 0.0321 | 0.0271 | 0.0938 | 0.0225 | |||
|
| 0.8400 | 0.4962 | 0.7630 | 0.3401 |
Fig. 3a and b PRCC indicating sensitivity indices to infected individual (I) and basic reproduction number . PRCC values of various parameters with the level of significance 0.05. Sample size = 500 for each parameters is taken based on LHS approach with uniform probability distribution
Fig. 4Contour plots indicating the nature of change in basic reproduction number() of SCEAIHR model under parametric planes. a versus . b versus . (c) versus
Fig. 5a versus plot indicating backward bifurcation of SCEAIHR model in . b versus plot illustrating transcritical bifurcation of SCEAIHR model in with . All the remaining parameters values are reported in Table 1
Fig. 6Impacts of variation in , on backward bifurcation with , keeping all parameters value remained same as in Table 1. The diagram exhibits that the extent of backward bifurcation regime increases gradually with the increasing of
Fig. 7a, b represent versus plot (with and versus plot (with . c represent over matrix plot, where . The corresponding color bar indicates values of . The values of the other parameters are taken as same, shown in Table 1
Fig. 8a, b represent versus plot (with and versus plot (with . (c) represent over matrix plot, where . The corresponding color bar indicates values of . The values of the other parameters are taken as same, shown in Table 1