Jonathan Kochav1, Jennifer Chen2, Lakshmi Nambiar2, Hannah W Mitlak2, Arielle Kushman2, Razia Sultana2, Evelyn Horn2, Arindam RoyChoudhury3, Richard B Devereux2, Jonathan W Weinsaft2, Jiwon Kim4. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 3. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. Electronic address: jik9027@med.cornell.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) provides a key remodeling index alterable by pulmonary hypertension. Although echocardiography commonly integrates linear wall thickness and chamber dimensions to quantify left ventricular remodeling, the utility of an equivalent right ventricular (RV)-based approach is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 200 patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 30 days (median = 3 days; interquartile range, 15 days), stratified by echocardiography-quantified pulmonary artery systolic pressure (<35, 35 to <55, 55 to <75, or ≥75 mm Hg). Echocardiographic assessment included RV linear dimensions in parasternal long-axis and apical four-chamber views and wall thicknesses in parasternal long-axis, four-chamber, and subcostal views. Subcostal wall thickness was integrated with chamber diameters to calculate RV mass, which was tested in relation to CMR-quantified RV mass and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Echocardiography-based quantification of all linear dimensions was feasible in 95% of patients (190 of 200). RV wall thicknesses in all orientations increased in relation to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (P < .001) and was greater among patients with, versus those without, CMR-evidenced RVH (P < .001 for all). Correlations between echocardiography and CMR were greatest for RV basal diameter (r = 0.73), RV subcostal wall thickness (r = 0.71), and global RV mass (r = 0.82; P < .001 for all). Echocardiography-derived global RV mass cutoffs were established in a derivation cohort and tested in a validation cohort. Results demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity (75.5% and 74.0%, respectively) in relation to CMR-quantified RVH. During follow-up (median, 4.2 years), 18% of patients (n = 36) died. Echocardiography-evidenced RVH (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .048) conferred similar mortality risk compared with RVH on CMR (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.22-4.78; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography-quantified RV parameters provide a robust index of RV afterload. Global RV mass calculated using a novel echocardiographic formula based on readily available linear indices yields good diagnostic performance for CMR-evidenced RVH and confers increased mortality risk. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) provides a key remodeling index alterable by pulmonary hypertension. Although echocardiography commonly integrates linear wall thickness and chamber dimensions to quantify left ventricular remodeling, the utility of an equivalent right ventricular (RV)-based approach is unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 200 patients undergoing transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 30 days (median = 3 days; interquartile range, 15 days), stratified by echocardiography-quantified pulmonary artery systolic pressure (<35, 35 to <55, 55 to <75, or ≥75 mm Hg). Echocardiographic assessment included RV linear dimensions in parasternal long-axis and apical four-chamber views and wall thicknesses in parasternal long-axis, four-chamber, and subcostal views. Subcostal wall thickness was integrated with chamber diameters to calculate RV mass, which was tested in relation to CMR-quantified RV mass and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Echocardiography-based quantification of all linear dimensions was feasible in 95% of patients (190 of 200). RV wall thicknesses in all orientations increased in relation to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (P < .001) and was greater among patients with, versus those without, CMR-evidenced RVH (P < .001 for all). Correlations between echocardiography and CMR were greatest for RV basal diameter (r = 0.73), RV subcostal wall thickness (r = 0.71), and global RV mass (r = 0.82; P < .001 for all). Echocardiography-derived global RV mass cutoffs were established in a derivation cohort and tested in a validation cohort. Results demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity (75.5% and 74.0%, respectively) in relation to CMR-quantified RVH. During follow-up (median, 4.2 years), 18% of patients (n = 36) died. Echocardiography-evidenced RVH (hazard ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.09-3.88; P = .048) conferred similar mortality risk compared with RVH on CMR (hazard ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.22-4.78; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography-quantified RV parameters provide a robust index of RV afterload. Global RV mass calculated using a novel echocardiographic formula based on readily available linear indices yields good diagnostic performance for CMR-evidenced RVH and confers increased mortality risk. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiac magnetic resonance; Echocardiography; Right ventricular hypertrophy
Authors: Lawrence G Rudski; Wyman W Lai; Jonathan Afilalo; Lanqi Hua; Mark D Handschumacher; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Scott D Solomon; Eric K Louie; Nelson B Schiller Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Neal A Chatterjee; Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Amy Praestgaard; Sanjiv J Shah; Corey E Ventetuolo; R Graham Barr; Richard Kronmal; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Alvaro Alonso; Steven M Kawut Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2017-01
Authors: Richard B Devereux; Mary J Roman; Vittorio Palmieri; Jennifer E Liu; Elisa T Lee; Lyle G Best; Richard R Fabsitz; Richard J Rodeheffer; Barbara V Howard Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Sergio C Pontes; Jorge E Assef; Rodrigo B M Barretto; Paulo Chaccur; Dalmo A R Moreira; Vinicius José Da S Nina; Frederico Nunes; Roberto H Melani; Edileide B Correia; Jarbas Dinkuisen; Amanda M R Sousa Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Nicholas J Farber; Sahadev T Reddy; Mark Doyle; Geetha Rayarao; Diane V Thompson; Peter Olson; Jerry Glass; Ronald B Williams; June A Yamrozik; Srinivas Murali; Robert Ww Biederman Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 5.364