Literature DB >> 33715431

The genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the moss Ceratodon purpureus.

Leslie M Kollar1, Scott Kiel2, Ashley J James1, Cody T Carnley1, Danielle N Scola1, Taylor N Clark1, Tikahari Khanal1, Todd N Rosenstiel2, Elliott T Gall3, Karl Grieshop4,5, Stuart F McDaniel1.   

Abstract

A central problem in evolutionary biology is to identify the forces that maintain genetic variation for fitness in natural populations. Sexual antagonism, in which selection favours different variants in males and females, can slow the transit of a polymorphism through a population or can actively maintain fitness variation. The amount of sexually antagonistic variation to be expected depends in part on the genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism, about which we know relatively little. Here, we used a multivariate quantitative genetic approach to examine the genetic architecture of sexual dimorphism in a scent-based fertilization syndrome of the moss Ceratodon purpureus. We found sexual dimorphism in numerous traits, consistent with a history of sexually antagonistic selection. The cross-sex genetic correlations (rmf) were generally heterogeneous with many values indistinguishable from zero, which typically suggests that genetic constraints do not limit the response to sexually antagonistic selection. However, we detected no differentiation between the female- and male-specific trait (co)variance matrices (Gf and Gm, respectively), meaning the evolution of sexual dimorphism may be constrained. The cross-sex cross-trait covariance matrix B contained both symmetric and asymmetric elements, indicating that the response to sexually antagonistic or sexually concordant selection, and the constraint to sexual dimorphism, are highly dependent on the traits experiencing selection. The patterns of genetic variances and covariances among these fitness components is consistent with partly sex-specific genetic architectures having evolved in order to partially resolve multivariate genetic constraints (i.e. sexual conflict), enabling the sexes to evolve towards their sex-specific multivariate trait optima.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B-matrix; G-matrix; constraint; sexual antagonism; sexual dimorphism; volatiles

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33715431      PMCID: PMC7944104          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  50 in total

1.  Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  T Rhen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Meiotic sex ratio variation in natural populations of Ceratodon purpureus (Ditrichaceae).

Authors:  Tatum E Norrell; Kelly S Jones; Adam C Payton; Stuart F McDaniel
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Predicting Multivariate Responses of Sexual Dimorphism to Direct and Indirect Selection.

Authors:  Changde Cheng 成常德; David Houle
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating.

Authors:  J F Kidwell; M T Clegg; F M Stewart; T Prout
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Experimental assessment of tree canopy and leaf litter controls on the microbiome and nitrogen fixation rates of two boreal mosses.

Authors:  Mélanie Jean; Hannah Holland-Moritz; April M Melvin; Jill F Johnstone; Michelle C Mack
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 8.  Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females.

Authors:  Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Dominance reversals and the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Disruptive natural selection predicts divergence between the sexes during adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Sex-limited chromosomes and non-reproductive traits.

Authors:  Aivars Cīrulis; Bengt Hansson; Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 7.364

2.  Measuring volatile emissions from moss gametophytes: A review of methodologies and new applications.

Authors:  Danlyn L Brennan; Leslie M Kollar; Scott Kiel; Timea Deakova; Aurélie Laguerre; Stuart F McDaniel; Sarah M Eppley; Elliott T Gall; Todd N Rosenstiel
Journal:  Appl Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.511

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.