Literature DB >> 33715333

Repeated dose of prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert when the first dose fails.

Ceyda Karadağ1, Sertaç Esin2, Yusuf Aytaç Tohma2, Ethem Serdar Yalvaç3, Tuğrul Başar4, Burak Karadağ5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of patients treated with repeated-dose prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) vaginal insert when the first dose fails.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 1.043 pregnant women who received dinoprostone for labor induction between November 2012 and August 2015. Pregnant women were divided into two groups according to the number of dinoprostone administrations: group 1, single-dose dinoprostone (n=1.000), and group 2, repeated-dose dinoprostone (n=43). Intrapartum, postpartum, and neonatal outcomes of the pregnant women were compared.
RESULTS: Vaginal delivery rate was 65% in group 1 and 30.2% in group 2 (p=0.001). The need for the neonatal intensive care unit was found in 44 pregnant women (4.4%) in group 1 and 6 pregnant women (13.6%) in group 2 (p=0.006).
CONCLUSION: When obstetric and neonatal data were evaluated in our study, we observed that dinoprostone administration was associated with increased cesarean rates and adverse neonatal outcomes with repeated-dose dinoprostone when the first dose failed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dinoprostone; labor induction; second-dose dinoprostone

Year:  2021        PMID: 33715333      PMCID: PMC7962160          DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.34119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 2149-9330


  19 in total

1.  Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil.

Authors:  J K Chyu; H T Strassner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.

Authors:  D A Wing; G Ortiz-Omphroy; R H Paul
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Is the Bishop-score significant in predicting the success of labor induction in multiparous women?

Authors:  D Navve; N Orenstein; R Ribak; Y Daykan; G Shechter-Maor; T Biron-Shental
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 4.  Natural prostaglandins for induction of labor and preinduction cervical ripening.

Authors:  Marc J N C Keirse
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Histological and electron-microscopic examinations of collagenous connective tissue of the non-pregnant cervix, the pregnant cervix, and the pregnant prostaglandin-treated cervix.

Authors:  P W Theobald; W Rath; H Kühnle; W Kuhn
Journal:  Arch Gynecol       Date:  1982

6.  Transcervical Foley's catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mohammed T Gadel Rab; Abdel Baset F Mohammed; Khalid A Zahran; Mo'men M Hassan; Abdel Razek M Eldeen; Emad M Ebrahim; Mohammed Yehia
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-08-14

7.  Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts.

Authors:  Leo Pevzner; William F Rayburn; Pamela Rumney; Deborah A Wing
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.

Authors:  Farnaz K Aghideh; Patrick M Mullin; Sue Ingles; Joseph G Ouzounian; Neisha Opper; Melissa L Wilson; David A Miller; Richard H Lee
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-08-27

Review 9.  Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.

Authors:  Jane Thomas; Anna Fairclough; Josephine Kavanagh; Anthony J Kelly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-19

10.  Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk.

Authors:  Rachel G Sinkey; Jasmin Lacevic; Tea Reljic; Iztok Hozo; Kelly S Gibson; Anthony O Odibo; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Charles J Lockwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.