| Literature DB >> 33715205 |
Pomme I H G Simons1,2,3, Olivier Valkenburg4, Ine Telgenkamp1,2, Koen M van der Waaij1,2, David M de Groot1, Pandichelvam Veeraiah5,6, Judith A P Bons7, Marja-Riitta Taskinen8, Jan Borén9, Patrick Schrauwen5, Joost H W Rutten10, David Cassiman11, Casper G Schalkwijk2,3, Coen D A Stehouwer2,3,12, Vera B Schrauwen-Hinderling5,6, Leanne Hodson13,14, Martijn C G J Brouwers1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Obesity and liver fat are associated with decreased levels of serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). Laboratory studies suggest that hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) is involved in the downregulation of SHBG synthesis. The aim of the present study was to address the role of DNL on serum SHBG in humans.Entities:
Keywords: de novo lipogenesis; liver fat; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; polycystic ovary syndrome; sex hormone binding globulin; stable isotopes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33715205 PMCID: PMC8287427 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14459
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) ISSN: 0300-0664 Impact factor: 3.478
Characteristics of Oxford and Maastricht study populations
|
Oxford ( |
Maastricht ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Male/female ( | 28/11 | 6/10 |
| Age (y) | 44.2 ± 6.4 | 59.3 ± 7.0 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.9 ± 2.9 | 29.6 ± 2.2 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.3 ± 0.5 | 5.5 ± 0.6 |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 83.9 (60.3–99.2) | 54.8 (32.3–85.0) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.4 ± 0.9 | 5.6 ± 1.1 |
| LDL‐cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 4.0 ± 1.1 |
| HDL‐cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.4 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.8 (1.1–2.2) | 1.6 (1.3–2.5) |
| Intrahepatic lipids (%) | 4.1 (1.7–6.8) | 4.1 (1.3–12.2) |
| De novo lipogenesis (%) | 7.6 (5.3–11.6) | 10.3 (6.9–12.2) |
| SHBG (nmol/L) | 28.1 (22.8–36.1) | 38.2 (31.6–57.3) |
| Use of oral contraceptives ( | 0 | 0 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as median (interquartile range)
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin.
FIGURE 1Association between de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content stratified by study population, that is Oxford (closed circles) and Maastricht (open circles)
FIGURE 2Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels in obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) and non‐obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) men (A) and women (B). Data are expressed as median with interquartile range. Differences between groups were analysed with linear regression analyses, adjusted for study population
Association of de novo lipogenesis with (log) sex hormone binding globulin in men and women
| Model, independent variables | Men ( | Women ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |
| Crude | 0.007 | −0.005; 0.019 | −0.015 | −0.030; 0.000 |
| Model 1: study population (Oxford/Maastricht) | 0.005 | −0.006; 0.016 | −0.015 | −0.031; 0.000 |
| Model 2: model 1 + age | 0.001 | −0.011; 0.012 | −0.015 | −0.031; 0.001 |
| Model 3: model 2 + BMI | 0.002 | −0.010; 0.014 | −0.018 | −0.031;−0.006 |
| Model 4: model 3 + serum insulin | 0.002 | −0.009; 0.014 | −0.013 | −0.028; 0.003 |
FIGURE 3Associations between de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) in men (A) and women (B). Data are stratified by study cohort, that is Oxford cohort (closed circles) and Maastricht cohort (open circles)