Marjorie Brand1,2, Jeffrey A Ranish3. 1. Sprott Center for Stem Cell Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 3. Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Erythropoiesis is a hierarchical process by which hematopoietic stem cells give rise to red blood cells through gradual cell fate restriction and maturation. Deciphering this process requires the establishment of dynamic gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that predict the response of hematopoietic cells to signals from the environment. Although GRNs have historically been derived from transcriptomic data, recent proteomic studies have revealed a major role for posttranscriptional mechanisms in regulating gene expression during erythropoiesis. These new findings highlight the need to integrate proteomic data into GRNs for a refined understanding of erythropoiesis. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we review recent proteomic studies that have furthered our understanding of erythropoiesis with a focus on quantitative mass spectrometry approaches to measure the abundance of transcription factors and cofactors during differentiation. Furthermore, we highlight challenges that remain in integrating transcriptomic, proteomic, and other omics data into a predictive model of erythropoiesis, and discuss the future prospect of single-cell proteomics. SUMMARY: Recent proteomic studies have considerably expanded our knowledge of erythropoiesis beyond the traditional transcriptomic-centric perspective. These findings have both opened up new avenues of research to increase our understanding of erythroid differentiation, while at the same time presenting new challenges in integrating multiple layers of information into a comprehensive gene regulatory model.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Erythropoiesis is a hierarchical process by which hematopoietic stem cells give rise to red blood cells through gradual cell fate restriction and maturation. Deciphering this process requires the establishment of dynamic gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that predict the response of hematopoietic cells to signals from the environment. Although GRNs have historically been derived from transcriptomic data, recent proteomic studies have revealed a major role for posttranscriptional mechanisms in regulating gene expression during erythropoiesis. These new findings highlight the need to integrate proteomic data into GRNs for a refined understanding of erythropoiesis. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we review recent proteomic studies that have furthered our understanding of erythropoiesis with a focus on quantitative mass spectrometry approaches to measure the abundance of transcription factors and cofactors during differentiation. Furthermore, we highlight challenges that remain in integrating transcriptomic, proteomic, and other omics data into a predictive model of erythropoiesis, and discuss the future prospect of single-cell proteomics. SUMMARY: Recent proteomic studies have considerably expanded our knowledge of erythropoiesis beyond the traditional transcriptomic-centric perspective. These findings have both opened up new avenues of research to increase our understanding of erythroid differentiation, while at the same time presenting new challenges in integrating multiple layers of information into a comprehensive gene regulatory model.
Authors: Brian K Erickson; Christopher M Rose; Craig R Braun; Alison R Erickson; Jeffrey Knott; Graeme C McAlister; Martin Wühr; Joao A Paulo; Robert A Everley; Steven P Gygi Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2017-01-05 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Marieangela C Wilson; Kongtana Trakarnsanga; Kate J Heesom; Nicola Cogan; Carole Green; Ashley M Toye; Steve F Parsons; David J Anstee; Jan Frayne Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Ryan J Ashley; Hongxia Yan; Nan Wang; John Hale; Brian M Dulmovits; Julien Papoin; Meagan E Olive; Namrata D Udeshi; Steven A Carr; Adrianna Vlachos; Jeffrey M Lipton; Lydie Da Costa; Christopher Hillyer; Sandrina Kinet; Naomi Taylor; Narla Mohandas; Anupama Narla; Lionel Blanc Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Emery H Bresnick; Kyle J Hewitt; Charu Mehta; Sunduz Keles; Robert F Paulson; Kirby D Johnson Journal: Development Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Christine Vogel; Raquel de Sousa Abreu; Daijin Ko; Shu-Yun Le; Bruce A Shapiro; Suzanne C Burns; Devraj Sandhu; Daniel R Boutz; Edward M Marcotte; Luiz O Penalva Journal: Mol Syst Biol Date: 2010-08-24 Impact factor: 11.429
Authors: Chia-Feng Tsai; Rui Zhao; Sarah M Williams; Ronald J Moore; Kendall Schultz; William B Chrisler; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic; Karin D Rodland; Richard D Smith; Tujin Shi; Ying Zhu; Tao Liu Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 5.911