Literature DB >> 33712719

Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams.

Alexandre Leduc1, Samia Chaouni1, Frédéric Pouzoulet2, Ludovic De Marzi3,4, Frédérique Megnin-Chanet5, Erwan Corre6, Dinu Stefan1,7, Jean-Louis Habrand1,7, François Sichel1, Carine Laurent8,9.   

Abstract

Proton therapy allows to avoid excess radiation dose on normal tissues. However, there are some limitations. Indeed, passive delivery of proton beams results in an increase in the lateral dose upstream of the tumor and active scanning leads to strong differences in dose delivery. This study aims to assess possible differences in the transcriptomic response of skin in C57BL/6 mice after TBI irradiation by active or passive proton beams at the dose of 6 Gy compared to unirradiated mice. In that purpose, total RNA was extracted from skin samples 3 months after irradiation and RNA-Seq was performed. Results showed that active and passive delivery lead to completely different transcription profiles. Indeed, 140 and 167 genes were differentially expressed after active and passive scanning compared to unirradiated, respectively, with only one common gene corresponding to RIKEN cDNA 9930021J03. Moreover, protein-protein interactions performed by STRING analysis showed that 31 and 25 genes are functionally related after active and passive delivery, respectively, with no common gene between both types of proton delivery. Analysis showed that active scanning led to the regulation of genes involved in skin development which was not the case with passive delivery. Moreover, 14 ncRNA were differentially regulated after active scanning against none for passive delivery. Active scanning led to 49 potential mRNA-ncRNA pairs with one ncRNA mainly involved, Gm44383 which is a miRNA. The 43 genes potentially regulated by the miRNA Gm44393 confirmed an important role of active scanning on skin keratin pathway. Our results demonstrated that there are differences in skin gene expression still 3 months after proton irradiation versus unirradiated mouse skin. And strong differences do exist in late skin gene expression between scattered or scanned proton beams. Further investigations are strongly needed to understand this discrepancy and to improve treatments by proton therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33712719      PMCID: PMC7955113          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85394-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  48 in total

1.  STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins.

Authors:  Christian von Mering; Martijn Huynen; Daniel Jaeggi; Steffen Schmidt; Peer Bork; Berend Snel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs.

Authors:  Marc Robert Fabian; Nahum Sonenberg; Witold Filipowicz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Biological effects of passive versus active scanning proton beams on human lung epithelial cells.

Authors:  Daila S Gridley; Michael J Pecaut; Xiao W Mao; Andrew J Wroe; Xian Luo-Owen
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-11

4.  Distinctive microRNA expression signatures in proton-irradiated mice.

Authors:  Shahid Yar Khan; Muhammad Akram Tariq; James Patrick Perrott; Christopher Drew Brumbaugh; Hyunsung John Kim; Muhammad Imran Shabbir; Govindarajan T Ramesh; Nader Pourmand
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  MicroRNA-145 Modulates Tumor Sensitivity to Radiation in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Pijun Gong; Tingting Zhang; Dalin He; Jer-Tsong Hsieh
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  How many biological replicates are needed in an RNA-seq experiment and which differential expression tool should you use?

Authors:  Nicholas J Schurch; Pietá Schofield; Marek Gierliński; Christian Cole; Alexander Sherstnev; Vijender Singh; Nicola Wrobel; Karim Gharbi; Gordon G Simpson; Tom Owen-Hughes; Mark Blaxter; Geoffrey J Barton
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  miR-205 enhances radiation sensitivity of prostate cancer cells by impairing DNA damage repair through PKCε and ZEB1 inhibition.

Authors:  Rihan El Bezawy; Stella Tinelli; Monica Tortoreto; Valentina Doldi; Valentina Zuco; Marco Folini; Claudio Stucchi; Tiziana Rancati; Riccardo Valdagni; Paolo Gandellini; Nadia Zaffaroni
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-04

8.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Proton radiotherapy for chest wall and regional lymphatic radiation; dose comparisons and treatment delivery.

Authors:  Shannon M MacDonald; Rachel Jimenez; Peter Paetzold; Judith Adams; Jonathan Beatty; Thomas F DeLaney; Hanne Kooy; Alphonse G Taghian; Hsiao-Ming Lu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Role of microRNA in response to ionizing radiations: evidences and potential impact on clinical practice for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Francesco Cellini; Alessio G Morganti; Domenico Genovesi; Nicola Silvestris; Vincenzo Valentini
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Can We Compare the Health-Related Quality of Life of Childhood Cancer Survivors Following Photon and Proton Radiation Therapy? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mikaela Doig; Eva Bezak; Nayana Parange; Peter Gorayski; Victoria Bedford; Michala Short
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.