Literature DB >> 24325134

Biological effects of passive versus active scanning proton beams on human lung epithelial cells.

Daila S Gridley1, Michael J Pecaut2, Xiao W Mao2, Andrew J Wroe3, Xian Luo-Owen4.   

Abstract

The goal was to characterize differences in cell response after exposure to active beam scanning (ABS) protons compared to a passive delivery system. Human lung epithelial (HLE) cells were evaluated at various locations along the proton depth dose profile. The dose delivered at the Bragg peak position was essentially identical (∼4 Gy) with the two techniques, but depth dose data showed that ABS resulted in lower doses at entry and more rapid drop-off after the peak. Average dose rates for the passive and ABS beams were 1.1 Gy/min and 5.1 Gy/min, respectively; instantaneous dose rates were 19.2 Gy/min and 2,300 Gy/min (to a 0.5 × 0.5 mm(2) voxel). Analysis of DNA synthesis was based on (3)H-TdR incorporation. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was done to determine expression of genes related to p53 signaling and DNA damage; a total of 152 genes were assessed. Spectral karyotyping and analyses of the Golgi apparatus and cytokines produced by the HLE cells were also performed. At or near the Bragg peak position, ABS protons resulted in a greater decrease in DNA synthesis compared to passively delivered protons. Genes with >2-fold change (P < 0.05 vs. 0 Gy) after passive proton irradiation at one or more locations within the Bragg curve were BTG2, CDKN1A, IFNB1 and SIAH1. In contrast, many more genes had >2-fold difference with ABS protons: BRCA1, BRCA2, CDC25A, CDC25C, CCNB2, CDK1, DMC1, DNMT1, E2F1, EXO1, FEN1, GADD45A, GTSE1, IL-6, JUN, KRAS, MDM4, PRC1, PTTG1, RAD51, RPA1, TNF, WT1, XRCC2, XRCC3 and XRCC6BP1. Spectral karyotyping revealed numerous differences in chromosomal abnormalities between the two delivery systems, especially at or near the Bragg peak. Percentage of cells staining for the Golgi apparatus was low after exposure to passive and active proton beams. Studies such as this are needed to ensure patient safety and make modifications in ABS delivery, if necessary.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosome aberrations; DNA synthesis; Gene expression; Ionizing radiation; Spectral karyotyping.; Spot scanning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24325134     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  11 in total

1.  Gene Expression Studies for the Development of Particle Therapy.

Authors:  Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

2.  Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.

Authors:  Yu An; Jie Shan; Samir H Patel; William Wong; Steven E Schild; Xiaoning Ding; Martin Bues; Wei Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness - Uncertainties and Opportunities.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

4.  Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  GTSE1 regulates spindle microtubule dynamics to control Aurora B kinase and Kif4A chromokinesin on chromosome arms.

Authors:  Aaron R Tipton; Jonathan D Wren; John R Daum; Joseph C Siefert; Gary J Gorbsky
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Investigating the impact of alpha/beta and LETd on relative biological effectiveness in scanned proton beams: An in vitro study based on human cell lines.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mara; Monika Clausen; Suphalak Khachonkham; Simon Deycmar; Clara Pessy; Wolfgang Dörr; Peter Kuess; Dietmar Georg; Sylvia Gruber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Biological Effects of Scattered Versus Scanned Proton Beams on Normal Tissues in Total Body Irradiated Mice: Survival, Genotoxicity, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation.

Authors:  Samia Chaouni; Alexandre Leduc; Frédéric Pouzoulet; Ludovic De Marzi; Frédérique Megnin-Chanet; Dinu Stefan; Jean-Louis Habrand; François Sichel; Carine Laurent
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

8.  Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams.

Authors:  Alexandre Leduc; Samia Chaouni; Frédéric Pouzoulet; Ludovic De Marzi; Frédérique Megnin-Chanet; Erwan Corre; Dinu Stefan; Jean-Louis Habrand; François Sichel; Carine Laurent
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Proton beam therapy delivered using pencil beam scanning vs. passive scattering/uniform scanning for localized prostate cancer: Comparative toxicity analysis of PCG 001-09.

Authors:  Mark V Mishra; Rahul Khairnar; Søren M Bentzen; Gary Larson; Henry Tsai; Christopher Sinesi; Carlos Vargas; George Laramore; Carl Rossi; Lane Rosen; Mingyao Zhu; William Hartsell
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-31

10.  In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Active Clinical Proton Beams.

Authors:  Anna Michaelidesová; Jana Vachelová; Jana Klementová; Tomáš Urban; Kateřina Pachnerová Brabcová; Stanislav Kaczor; Martin Falk; Iva Falková; Daniel Depeš; Vladimír Vondráček; Marie Davídková
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.