Literature DB >> 33712085

Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation.

Alesia M Jung1, Stacey A Missmer2,3, Daniel W Cramer3,4, Elizabeth S Ginsburg4, Kathryn L Terry3,4, Allison F Vitonis4, Leslie V Farland5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infertility history may have important implications for clinical practice and scientific discovery. Previous research on the validity of self-reported infertility measurements has been limited in scope and duration (< 5 years). In this study, we validated self-reported infertility history measures 15-23 years after fertility treatment initiation among women who utilized assisted reproductive technology (ART).
METHODS: Women who received ART treatments from three Boston infertility clinics and who enrolled in a prior study (1994-2003) were re-contacted in 2018 for the AfteR Treatment Follow-up Study (ART-FS). Infertility history was collected from clinical records and two self-report questionnaires (at ART initiation and at ART-FS enrollment). Treatment history included specific details (fresh or frozen embryo transfers, number of cycles) and treatment recall prior to ART initiation. Self-reported infertility diagnoses included polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, uterine factor infertility, tubal factor infertility, diminished ovarian reserve/advanced maternal age, male factor infertility, and other/unknown. We compared self-reported measures from 2018 to self-reported and clinical data from prior study initiation, using Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Of 2644 women we attempted to recontact, 808 completed the ART-FS, with an average follow-up of 19.6 years (standard deviation: 2.7). Recall of fertility treatment usage had moderate sensitivity (IVF = 0.85, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.81) but low specificity across different infertility treatment modalities (IVF = 0.63, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.55). Specific IVF details had low to moderate validity and reliability with clinical records. Reliability of recalled infertility diagnosis was higher when compared to self-report at ART initiation (PCOS K = 0.66, Endometriosis K = 0.76, Tubal K = 0.73) than when compared to clinical records (PCOS K = 0.31, Endometriosis K = 0.48, Tubal K = 0.62) and varied by diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The ability of women to recall specific IVF treatment details was moderately accurate and recall of self-reported infertility diagnosis varied by diagnosis and measurement method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology; InVitro fertilization; Endometriosis; Epidemiology; Fertility; Fertility treatment; infertility; validity; reliability; Polycystic ovary syndrome

Year:  2021        PMID: 33712085      PMCID: PMC7953690          DOI: 10.1186/s40738-021-00099-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Res Pract        ISSN: 2054-7099


  32 in total

1.  Genetic counselling: information given, recall and satisfaction.

Authors:  S Michie; V McDonald; T M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

2.  Effects of lifetime exercise on the outcome of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Stephanie N Morris; Stacey A Missmer; Daniel W Cramer; R Douglas Powers; Patricia M McShane; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Confounding and effect measure modification in reproductive medicine research.

Authors:  Katharine Fb Correia; Laura E Dodge; Leslie V Farland; Michele R Hacker; Elizabeth Ginsburg; Brian W Whitcomb; Lauren A Wise; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Brenda L Minor; Veida Elliott; Michelle Fernandez; Lindsay O'Neal; Laura McLeod; Giovanni Delacqua; Francesco Delacqua; Jacqueline Kirby; Stephany N Duda
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Failure of fertility therapy and subsequent adverse cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Jacob A Udell; Hong Lu; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Use of fertility treatment modalities in a large United States cohort of professional women.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Stacey A Missmer; Janet Rich-Edwards; Jorge E Chavarro; Robert L Barbieri; Francine Grodstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Jeani Chang; Lisa Flowers; Aniket Kulkarni; Glenda Sentelle; Gary Jeng; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2009-06-12

8.  Cardiovascular risk may be increased in women with unexplained infertility.

Authors:  Fatma Ferda Verit; Fadile Yildiz Zeyrek; Ali Galip Zebitay; Hurkan Akyol
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2017-03-31

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies on a diabetes case definition from health administrative records.

Authors:  Aaron Leong; Kaberi Dasgupta; Sasha Bernatsky; Diane Lacaille; Antonio Avina-Zubieta; Elham Rahme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

View more
  1 in total

1.  Infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, and risk of stroke: pooled analysis of individual patient data of 618 851 women.

Authors:  Chen Liang; Hsin-Fang Chung; Annette J Dobson; Kunihiko Hayashi; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Diana Kuh; Rebecca Hardy; Carol A Derby; Samar R El Khoudary; Imke Janssen; Sven Sandin; Elisabete Weiderpass; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.