Literature DB >> 33712042

Prevalence of heterophilic antibodies in serum samples from horses in an equine hospital, and elimination of interference using chicken IgY.

Bo Dong1,2, Daniel Bergman1, Bodil Ström Holst3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heterophilic antibodies in serum and plasma can interfere with mammalian antibodies in immunoassays and result in false test results, usually false positive. Although studies screening for heterophilic antibodies as well as elimination studies have been conducted in dogs and cats, knowledge of the presence of heterophilic antibodies in other species in veterinary medicine is limited. In this study, a 2-site sandwich-type interference assay that detects anti-mouse antibodies was used to detect heterophilic antibodies in a population of horses treated in an animal hospital.
RESULTS: A total of 194 serum samples from 127 individual horses were analyzed. There were 11/127 (8.7%) interference-positive horses, and these were analyzed in an assay exchanging the capture mouse IgG with chicken IgY. The positive samples were negative in the chicken IgY assay, indicating elimination of a possible interference, with the chicken-based assay. Four interference-positive samples were from geldings, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) was analyzed from these samples. AMH concentrations were negative in these samples as expected in geldings, indicating that the heterophilic antibodies did not cause interference in the AMH assay.
CONCLUSION: The present study shows that there are heterophilic antibodies in horse serum samples like in samples from humans, dogs, and cats. The use of chicken-based reagents, such as chicken IgY, which do not cross-react with mammalian IgG, eliminates the effects of interfering antibodies in the samples. Equine heterophilic antibodies do not necessarily cause interference in commercial immunoassays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ELISA; Heterophilic antibodies; Horse; Interference; Serum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33712042      PMCID: PMC7953668          DOI: 10.1186/s13028-021-00575-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Vet Scand        ISSN: 0044-605X            Impact factor:   1.695


  28 in total

1.  Heterophile antibodies in horse plasma interfering in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  V Borromeo; A Berrini; D Gaggioli; C Secchi
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 2.  Calcitonin measurement and immunoassay interference: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Simona Censi; Elisabetta Cavedon; Sara Watutantrige Fernando; Susi Barollo; Loris Bertazza; Laura Zambonin; Martina Zaninotto; Diego Faggian; Mario Plebani; Caterina Mian
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Transient nature of interference effects from heterophile antibodies: examples of interference with cardiac marker measurements.

Authors:  S C Kazmierczak; P G Catrou; K P Briley
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Interference with clinical laboratory analyses.

Authors:  M H Kroll; R J Elin
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Heterophile antibody interference in a solid phase sandwich immunoassay for detection of equine growth hormone in plasma.

Authors:  V Borromeo; A Berrini; D Gaggioli; C Secchi
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.046

6.  Detection of recombinant human EPO administered to horses using MAIIA lateral flow isoform test.

Authors:  Maria Lönnberg; Ulf Bondesson; Florence Cormant; Patrice Garcia; Yves Bonnaire; Jan Carlsson; Marie-Agnes Popot; Niclas Rollborn; Kristina Råsbo; Ludovic Bailly-Chouriberry
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Interferences with two-site immunoassays by human anti-mouse antibodies formed by patients treated with monoclonal antibodies: comparison of different blocking reagents.

Authors:  J Reinsberg
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Chicken antibodies: a tool to avoid interference by human anti-mouse antibodies in ELISA after in vivo treatment with murine monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  A Larsson; H Mellstedt
Journal:  Hybridoma       Date:  1992-02

9.  Pre-existing canine anti-IgG antibodies: implications for immunotherapy, immunogenicity testing and immunoassay analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Bergman; Camilla Bäckström; Helene Hansson-Hamlin; Anders Larsson; Bodil Ström Holst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Serum sample containing endogenous antibodies interfering with multiple hormone immunoassays. Laboratory strategies to detect interference.

Authors:  Elena García-González; Maite Aramendía; Diego Álvarez-Ballano; Pablo Trincado; Luis Rello
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2015-11-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  Analysis of 4 cases of children with false-positive results of novel coronavirus-specific antibody.

Authors:  Shuzhi Dai; Jingjing Li; Jing Li; Long Li; Lin Shi; Ling Cao; Xuemei Zhong; Weijie Liu; Ying Wang; Lijuan Ma
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.567

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.