Samira Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi1,2, Charo Rodriguez3,4, Jordie Croteau5, Alireza Sadeghpour6,7, Amir-Mohammad Navali6,7, France Légaré8,9. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. Samira.rahimi@mcgill.ca. 2. Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Canada. Samira.rahimi@mcgill.ca. 3. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. 4. Institute of Health Sciences Education (IHSE), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. 5. L'institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Quebec City, Canada. 6. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 7. Orthopedic Surgery Department, Shohada University Hospital, Tabriz, Iran. 8. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada. 9. VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to assess healthcare professionals' acceptance of and satisfaction with a shared decision making (SDM) educational workshop, its impact on their intention to use SDM, and their perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation of SDM in clinical settings in Iran. METHODS: We conducted an observational quantitative study that involved measurements before, during, and immediately after the educational intervention at stake. We invited healthcare professionals affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, East Azerbaijan, Iran, to attend a half-day workshop on SDM in December 2016. Decisions about prenatal screening and knee replacement surgery was used as clinical vignettes. We provided a patient decision aid on prenatal screening that complied with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and used illustrate videos. Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and a questionnaire to assess their familiarity with SDM, a questionnaire based on theoretical domains framework to assess their intention to implement SDM, a questionnaire about their perceived facilitators and barriers of implementing SDM in their clinical practice, continuous professional development reaction questionnaire, and workshop evaluation. Quantitative data was analyzed descriptively and with multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Among the 60 healthcare professionals invited, 41 participated (68%). Twenty-three were female (57%), 18 were specialized in family and emergency medicine, or community and preventive medicine (43%), nine were surgeons (22%), and 14 (35%) were other types of specialists. Participants' mean age was 37.51 ± 8.64 years with 8.09 ± 7.8 years of clinical experience. Prior to the workshop, their familiarity with SDM was 3.10 ± 2.82 out of 9. After the workshop, their belief that practicing SDM would be beneficial and useful (beliefs about consequences) (beta = 0.67, 95% CI 0.27, 1.06) and beliefs about capability of using SDM (beta = 0.32, 95% CI -0.08, 0.72) had the strongest influence on their intention of practicing SDM. Participants perceived the main facilitator and barrier to perform SDM were training and high patient load, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Participants thought the workshop was a good way to learn SDM and that they would be able to use what they had learned in their clinical practice. Future studies need to study the level of intention of participants in longer term and evaluate the impact of cultural differences on practicing SDM and its implementation in both western and non-western countries.
BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to assess healthcare professionals' acceptance of and satisfaction with a shared decision making (SDM) educational workshop, its impact on their intention to use SDM, and their perceived facilitators and barriers to the implementation of SDM in clinical settings in Iran. METHODS: We conducted an observational quantitative study that involved measurements before, during, and immediately after the educational intervention at stake. We invited healthcare professionals affiliated with Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, East Azerbaijan, Iran, to attend a half-day workshop on SDM in December 2016. Decisions about prenatal screening and knee replacement surgery was used as clinical vignettes. We provided a patient decision aid on prenatal screening that complied with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards and used illustrate videos. Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and a questionnaire to assess their familiarity with SDM, a questionnaire based on theoretical domains framework to assess their intention to implement SDM, a questionnaire about their perceived facilitators and barriers of implementing SDM in their clinical practice, continuous professional development reaction questionnaire, and workshop evaluation. Quantitative data was analyzed descriptively and with multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Among the 60 healthcare professionals invited, 41 participated (68%). Twenty-three were female (57%), 18 were specialized in family and emergency medicine, or community and preventive medicine (43%), nine were surgeons (22%), and 14 (35%) were other types of specialists. Participants' mean age was 37.51 ± 8.64 years with 8.09 ± 7.8 years of clinical experience. Prior to the workshop, their familiarity with SDM was 3.10 ± 2.82 out of 9. After the workshop, their belief that practicing SDM would be beneficial and useful (beliefs about consequences) (beta = 0.67, 95% CI 0.27, 1.06) and beliefs about capability of using SDM (beta = 0.32, 95% CI -0.08, 0.72) had the strongest influence on their intention of practicing SDM. Participants perceived the main facilitator and barrier to perform SDM were training and high patient load, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Participants thought the workshop was a good way to learn SDM and that they would be able to use what they had learned in their clinical practice. Future studies need to study the level of intention of participants in longer term and evaluate the impact of cultural differences on practicing SDM and its implementation in both western and non-western countries.
Entities:
Keywords:
Continuous professional development; Implementation; Iran; Medical education; Patient engagement; Shared decision making
Authors: Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-08-14
Authors: Cornelia Betsch; Robert Böhm; Collins O Airhihenbuwa; Robb Butler; Gretchen B Chapman; Niels Haase; Benedikt Herrmann; Tasuku Igarashi; Shinobu Kitayama; Lars Korn; Ülla-Karin Nurm; Bernd Rohrmann; Alexander J Rothman; Sharon Shavitt; John A Updegraff; Ayse K Uskul Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 2.583
Authors: Mary Simons; Frances Rapport; Yvonne Zurynski; Marcus Stoodley; Jeremy Cullis; Andrew S Davidson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Gloria Ayivi-Vinz; Felly Bakwa Kanyinga; Lysa Bergeron; Simon Décary; Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Sam J Daniel; Martin Tremblay; Karine V Plourde; Sabrina Guay-Bélanger; France Légaré Journal: JMIR Med Educ Date: 2022-05-02