Baskaran Chandrasekaran1, Arto J Pesola2, Chythra R Rao3, Ashokan Arumugam4,5. 1. Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. 2. Active Life Lab, South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Mikkeli, Finland. 3. Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. chythra.raj@manipal.edu. 4. Department of Physiotherapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, P.O.Box 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. 5. Sustainable Engineering Asset Management Research Group, RISE-Research Institute of Sciences and Engineering, University of Sharjah, P.O.Box: 27272, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prolonged (excessive) sitting is detrimentally associated with cardiovascular, metabolic and mental health. Moreover, prolonged sitting has been associated with poor executive function, memory, attention and visuospatial skills, which are important cognitive aspects of work performance. Breaking up prolonged sitting with standing or light-intensity exercises at the workplace is recognized as a potential measure in improving cognition. However, preliminary evidence, primarily from acute laboratory experiments, has enabled formulating hypothesis on the possible mechanistic pathways. Hence, the aim of this mapping review is to gather preliminary evidence and substantiate possible physiological mechanisms underpinning the putative effects of breaking prolonged sitting on improving cognitive function among sedentary office workers. MAPPING METHOD: We searched four databases to identify relevant studies that explored the effects of uninterrupted sitting on cognitive function. First, we introduce how prolonged sitting increases the risks of hyperglycemia, autonomic stability, inflammation, adverse hormonal changes and restrictions in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and alters cognitive function. Second, we elucidate the direct and indirect effects of breaking up prolonged sitting time that may prevent a decline in cognitive performance by influencing glycaemic variability, autonomic stability, hormones (brain derived neurotrophic factor, dopamine, serotonin), vascular functions, and CBF. We highlight the importance of breaking up prolonged sitting on metabolic, vascular and endocrine functions, which in turn may improve cognitive functions and eventually foster work productivity. Improved synaptic transmission or neuroplasticity due to increased brain glucose and mitochondrial metabolism, increased endothelial shear and CBF, increased brain neurotrophic factors (dopamine) and accelerated anti-inflammatory functions are some of the hypothetical mechanisms underpinning improved cognitive functions. CONCLUSION: We postulate that improving cognitive function by breaking up prolonged sitting periods is biologically plausible with the myriad of (suggested) physiological mechanisms. Future experimental studies to ascertain the aforementioned hypothetical mechanisms and clinical trials to break sedentary behavior and improve cognitive functions in sedentary office workers are warranted.
BACKGROUND: Prolonged (excessive) sitting is detrimentally associated with cardiovascular, metabolic and mental health. Moreover, prolonged sitting has been associated with poor executive function, memory, attention and visuospatial skills, which are important cognitive aspects of work performance. Breaking up prolonged sitting with standing or light-intensity exercises at the workplace is recognized as a potential measure in improving cognition. However, preliminary evidence, primarily from acute laboratory experiments, has enabled formulating hypothesis on the possible mechanistic pathways. Hence, the aim of this mapping review is to gather preliminary evidence and substantiate possible physiological mechanisms underpinning the putative effects of breaking prolonged sitting on improving cognitive function among sedentary office workers. MAPPING METHOD: We searched four databases to identify relevant studies that explored the effects of uninterrupted sitting on cognitive function. First, we introduce how prolonged sitting increases the risks of hyperglycemia, autonomic stability, inflammation, adverse hormonal changes and restrictions in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and alters cognitive function. Second, we elucidate the direct and indirect effects of breaking up prolonged sitting time that may prevent a decline in cognitive performance by influencing glycaemic variability, autonomic stability, hormones (brain derived neurotrophic factor, dopamine, serotonin), vascular functions, and CBF. We highlight the importance of breaking up prolonged sitting on metabolic, vascular and endocrine functions, which in turn may improve cognitive functions and eventually foster work productivity. Improved synaptic transmission or neuroplasticity due to increased brain glucose and mitochondrial metabolism, increased endothelial shear and CBF, increased brain neurotrophic factors (dopamine) and accelerated anti-inflammatory functions are some of the hypothetical mechanisms underpinning improved cognitive functions. CONCLUSION: We postulate that improving cognitive function by breaking up prolonged sitting periods is biologically plausible with the myriad of (suggested) physiological mechanisms. Future experimental studies to ascertain the aforementioned hypothetical mechanisms and clinical trials to break sedentary behavior and improve cognitive functions in sedentary office workers are warranted.
Authors: Laura E Middleton; Todd M Manini; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris; Deborah E Barnes; Frances Tylavsky; Jennifer S Brach; James E Everhart; Kristine Yaffe Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-07-19
Authors: Nyssa T Hadgraft; Genevieve N Healy; Neville Owen; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Brigid M Lynch; Parneet Sethi; Elizabeth G Eakin; Marj Moodie; Anthony D LaMontagne; Glen Wiesner; Lisa Willenberg; David W Dunstan Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2016-06-15
Authors: Maha Sellami; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Maamer Slimani; Lawrence Hayes; Georges Jabbour; Andrea De Giorgio; Benoit Dugué Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sophie E Carter; Richard Draijer; Joseph D Maxwell; Abigail S Morris; Scott J Pedersen; Lee E F Graves; Dick H J Thijssen; Nicola D Hopkins Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Agnes Görlach; Elitsa Y Dimova; Andreas Petry; Antonio Martínez-Ruiz; Pablo Hernansanz-Agustín; Anabela P Rolo; Carlos M Palmeira; Thomas Kietzmann Journal: Redox Biol Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 11.799
Authors: Katharina E Kariippanon; Kar Hau Chong; Xanne Janssen; Simone A Tomaz; Evelyn H C Ribeiro; Nyaradzai Munambah; Cecilia H S Chan; Pw Prasad Chathurangana; Catherine E Draper; Asmaa El Hamdouchi; Alex A Florindo; Hongyan Guan; Amy S Ha; Mohammad Sorowar Hossain; Dong Hoon Kim; Thanh VAN Kim; Denise C L Koh; Marie Löf; Bang Nguyen Pham; Bee Koon Poh; John J Reilly; Amanda E Staiano; Adang Suherman; Chiaki Tanaka; Hong Kim Tang; Mark S Tremblay; E Kipling Webster; V Pujitha Wickramasinghe; Jyh Eiin Wong; Anthony D Okely Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2022-02-10
Authors: Antoine Noël Racine; Irène Margaritis; Martine Duclos; François Carré; Anne Vuillemin; Christèle Gautier Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 4.424