BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that physically active people have reduced risk of incident cognitive impairment in late life. However, these studies are limited by reliance on self-reports of physical activity, which only moderately correlate with objective measures and often exclude activity not readily quantifiable by frequency and duration. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between activity energy expenditure (AEE), an objective measure of total activity, and incidence of cognitive impairment. METHODS: We calculated AEE as 90% of total energy expenditure (assessed during 2 weeks using doubly labeled water) minus resting metabolic rate (measured using indirect calorimetry) in 197 men and women (mean age, 74.8 years) who were free of mobility and cognitive impairments at study baseline (1998-1999). Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and 2 or 5 years later using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination. Cognitive impairment was defined as a decline of at least 1.0 SD (9 points) between baseline and follow-up evaluations. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline Modified Mini-Mental State Examination scores, demographics, fat-free mass, sleep duration, self-reported health, and diabetes mellitus, older adults in the highest sex-specific tertile of AEE had lower odds of incident cognitive impairment than those in the lowest tertile (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.79). There was also a significant dose response between AEE and incidence of cognitive impairment (P = .05 for trend over tertiles). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that greater AEE may be protective against cognitive impairment in a dose-response manner. The significance of overall activity in contrast to vigorous or light activity should be determined.
BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that physically active people have reduced risk of incident cognitive impairment in late life. However, these studies are limited by reliance on self-reports of physical activity, which only moderately correlate with objective measures and often exclude activity not readily quantifiable by frequency and duration. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between activity energy expenditure (AEE), an objective measure of total activity, and incidence of cognitive impairment. METHODS: We calculated AEE as 90% of total energy expenditure (assessed during 2 weeks using doubly labeled water) minus resting metabolic rate (measured using indirect calorimetry) in 197 men and women (mean age, 74.8 years) who were free of mobility and cognitive impairments at study baseline (1998-1999). Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and 2 or 5 years later using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination. Cognitive impairment was defined as a decline of at least 1.0 SD (9 points) between baseline and follow-up evaluations. RESULTS: After adjustment for baseline Modified Mini-Mental State Examination scores, demographics, fat-free mass, sleep duration, self-reported health, and diabetes mellitus, older adults in the highest sex-specific tertile of AEE had lower odds of incident cognitive impairment than those in the lowest tertile (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.79). There was also a significant dose response between AEE and incidence of cognitive impairment (P = .05 for trend over tertiles). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that greater AEE may be protective against cognitive impairment in a dose-response manner. The significance of overall activity in contrast to vigorous or light activity should be determined.
Authors: Patricia A Boyle; Aron S Buchman; Robert S Wilson; Sue E Leurgans; David A Bennett Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ronica N Rooks; Eleanor M Simonsick; Toni Miles; Anne Newman; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Richard Schulz; Tamara Harris Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Stéphane Blanc; Dale A Schoeller; Douglas Bauer; Michelle E Danielson; Frances Tylavsky; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris; Stephen B Kritchevsky; James E Everhart Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: T Yoshitake; Y Kiyohara; I Kato; T Ohmura; H Iwamoto; K Nakayama; S Ohmori; K Nomiyama; H Kawano; K Ueda Journal: Neurology Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Wenfei Zhu; Virginia J Howard; Virginia G Wadley; Brent Hutto; Steven N Blair; John E Vena; Natalie Colabianchi; David Rhodes; Steven P Hooker Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joshua Z Willey; Yeseon Park Moon; Rachel Ruder; Yuen K Cheung; Ralph L Sacco; Mitchell S V Elkind; Clinton B Wright Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Renée F A G de Bruijn; Elisabeth M C Schrijvers; Karen A de Groot; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Albert Hofman; Oscar H Franco; Peter J Koudstaal; Mohammad Arfan Ikram Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Jacqueline Kerr; Simon J Marshall; Ruth E Patterson; Catherine R Marinac; Loki Natarajan; Dori Rosenberg; Kari Wasilenko; Katie Crist Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.562